******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT February 18, 2000 Michelle Russo: (202) 418-2358 FCC Says Internet Service Provider Does Not Qualify for Leased Access Washington, DC The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has decided that an Internet service provider (ISP) is not entitled to obtain leased access to a cable system for the purpose of providing Internet access or any service other than video programming. The FCC's Memorandum Opinion and Order denies a Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed by Internet Ventures, Inc. (IVI) and its subsidiary, Internet On-Ramp, Inc. IVI, an Internet service provider, argued that it is entitled to commercial leased access to a cable system in Washington state under Section 612 of the Communications Act. The Commission denied the petition. Section 612 of the Communications Act requires cable operators of systems with 36 or more channels to designate channel capacity for commercial use by unaffiliated third parties. Commercial use is defined in the law as the "provision of video programming." The statutory definition of video programming is "programming provided by, or generally considered comparable to programming provided by a television broadcast station." The FCC concluded that Section 612 does not require cable operators to make available channel capacity on their systems for the range of services that IVI seeks to offer. The FCC determined that it need address only the most basic threshold issue to resolve IVI's petition: does ISP Internet access service, such as that provided by IVI, constitute video programming as contemplated by Section 612 of the Communications Act (i.e. programming provided by, or generally considered comparable to programming provided by, a television broadcast station)? The FCC concluded that it does not. Action by the Commission, February 7, 2000, by Memorandum Opinion and Order (CSR 5407-L; FCC No. 00-37). Chairman Kennard, Commissioners Ness, Furchtgott-Roth, Powell and Tristani. -FCC- Cable Services Bureau contact: Karen Kosar at (202) 418-7200