FOR FCC RECORD ONLY $//King Videocable Company, Placerville, CA, MO&O, DA 95-278//$ $/76.922 Rates for Cable Programming Service tiers/$ $/benchmark cable rates/$ Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. DA 95-278 In the matter of ) ) King Videocable Company) CUID No. CA0270 Placerville, California) ) Benchmark Filing To Support ) Cable Programming Service Price ) Memorandum Opinion and Order Adopted: February 21, 1995 Released: February 23, 1995 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: Introduction 1. Here we consider a complaint about the price King Videocable Company ("King") was charging for its cable programming service ("CPS") tier in Placerville, California, CUID No. CA0270. King has attempted to justify its price through a benchmark showing on FCC Form 393. This Order addresses the reasonableness of King's price only through May 14, 1994. At a later time we will issue a separate order addressing the reasonableness of the price after that date. 2. Under the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, and our rules implementing it, 47 C.F.R. Part 76, Subpart N, the Commission must review CPS prices upon the filing of a valid complaint. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPS prices. Under our rules, an operator may attempt to justify its prices through either a benchmark showing or a cost-of-service showing. In either case, the operator has the burden of demonstrating that its CPS prices are not unreasonable. 3. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993. The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994. Operators with valid CPS complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that their CPS prices were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994, and that their prices were in compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward. Operators attempting to justify their prices for the period prior to May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing must complete and file FCC Form 393. Generally, to justify their prices for the period beginning May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing, operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series. Procedural Matters 4. The first valid CPS complaint was completed and served on King on January 27, 1994. The Commission received the complaint on February 1, 1994. 5. King attempted to justify its CPS price through an FCC Form 393 filed on March 11, 1994. King amended its justification on June 29, 1994 in response to a Cable Services Bureau Order citing common deficiencies observed in benchmark filings generally, and on January 24, 1995, in response to a Cable Services Bureau Public Notice offering operators the opportunity to make optional supplemental filings. Discussion 6. In its amended benchmark filing of June 29, 1994, King calculated a maximum permitted price for the CPS tier of $8.85 per month. Upon review of King's filing, we have found no apparent errors that would require a recalculation of King's maximum permitted CPS price. However, King's actual price for the CPS tier was $8.92 per month. Thus, King has failed to demonstrate that its price for the CPS tier was not unreasonable. Conclusions 7. Upon review of the record herein, we conclude that King's showing supports a maximum reasonable CPS tier price of $8.85 per month (plus franchise fee) for the period February 1, 1994 to May 14, 1994. However, we further determine that the refund at issue is such a de minimis amount that it would not serve the public interest to order a refund. 8. We further conclude that King must reflect in its FCC Form 1200 rate filing for the period after May 14, 1994 the fact that King's price during the earlier period was unreasonable. We reserve the right to make further adjustments to King's prices for the period after May 14, 1994 upon completion of our review of King's FCC Form 1200 rate filing. 9. We further conclude that King has submitted in good faith a timely optional supplemental filing in response to our December 29, 1994 Public Notice. As provided in the Public Notice, we will relieve King of its obligation to obtain advance Commission approval of adjustments to its CPS price for one year following the release of this Order. 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the January 27, 1994 complaint against the cable programming service price charged by King Videocable Company in Placerville, California, CUID No. CA0270, IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN AND DENIED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the benchmark filing submitted by King Videocable Company with respect to Placerville, California, CUID No. CA0270, for the period of February 1, 1994 to May 14, 1994, justifies a maximum price of $8.85 per month (plus franchise fee) for the cable programming service tier. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.922(b)(4)(C) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)(4)(C), that King Videocable Company shall, within 30 days of the release of this Order, revise its Form 1200 filing with respect to Placerville, California, CUID No. CA0270, for the period beginning May 15, 1994, to reduce the monthly charge per tier as of March 31, 1994 for Tier 2 (Line A6b) to equal the maximum permitted rate (plus franchise fee). 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that King Videocable Company shall place into effect, within 30 days after its submission of the revised Form 1200 filing required above, a CPS tier price that reflects the reduction in the CPS rate determined in this Order. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.960 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.960, that King Videocable Company shall not be required to obtain advance Commission approval of adjustments to its CPS price for one year following the release of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gregory J. Vogt Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau