******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) TKR Cable Company ) CUID No. NY0794 (Orangetown) ) Complaints Regarding ) Cable Programming Services Tier ) Rate Increases ) ORDER Adopted: January 22, 1997 Released: January 23, 1997 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order we consider complaints concerning the rate increases of TKR Cable Company d/b/a TKR Cable Company of Rockland ("TKR") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the Town of Orangetown ("Town"), CUID No. NY0794. This Order addresses the reasonableness of TKR's rates from November 29, 1993 to date. TKR has attempted to justify its CPST rates through benchmark showings on FCC Form 393, FCC Form 1200, FCC Forms 1210 and FCC Form 1240. We conclude, for the reasons discussed below, that the rates charged by TKR are unreasonable. 2. The Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") has previously made a determination of TKR's CPST rates in two communities in the Rockland system. Our previous rate review of the Rockland system appears to also apply to the Town. TKR filed a Petition for Reconsideration and Emergency Petition for Stay of that order on April 19, 1996. The Commission granted TKR's Emergency Petition for Stay on May 29, 1996. TKR's Petition applied only to two communities in the Rockland system, Clarkstown (CUID No. NY0449) and Montvale (CUID No. NJ0489), and did not include the community in the immediate case, Orangetown (CUID No. NY0794). However, TKR's CPST rate in the Rockland system during the period September 1, 1993 through May 14, 1994 is under review by the Commission due to TKR's Petition for Reconsideration and Stay. This is not an order on reconsideration of that proceeding. Nevertheless, in this order we begin with the findings made in our original determination. 3. The Communications Act authorizes the "Commission" to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates charged are not unreasonable. The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992 Cable Act") required the Commission to review CPST rates upon the filing of a valid complaint by a subscriber or local franchise authority ("LFA"). The Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") and our rules implementing the new legislation, require that complaints against the CPST rates be filed with the Commission only by an LFA that has received subscriber complaints. An LFA may not file a CPST rate complaint unless, within 90 days after such increase becomes effective, it receives more than one subscriber complaint. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates. If the Commission finds the rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability. 4. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993. The Commission revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994. Cable operators that have valid CPST complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that their CPST rates were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994. Cable operators must also demonstrate that their rates were in compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward. Cable operators attempting to justify their rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994 by a benchmark showing must use the FCC Form 1200 series. Cable operators may also justify rate increases based on the addition and deletion of channels, changes in certain external costs, and inflation, by filing FCC Form 1210. FCC Form 1210 must be filed at least 30 days before new rates are scheduled to go into effect when the Commission has found the cable programming service rate to be unreasonable less than one year prior to the filing. In addition, FCC Form 1210 may be filed where there is a pending complaint against the CPST rate. 5. Operators may justify adjustments to their rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240 to reflect reasonably certain and quantifiable changes in external costs, inflation and the number of regulated channels that are projected for the twelve months following the rate change. Any incurred cost that is not projected may be accrued with interest and added to rates at a later time. If actual and projected costs are different during the rate year a "true-up" mechanism is available to correct estimated costs with actual cost changes. The "true-up" requires operators to decrease their rates or alternatively permits them to increase their rates to make an adjustment for over or under estimations of these cost changes. 6. On November 29, 1993, August 15, 1994 and March 31, 1995 valid complaints were filed against the September 1993 CPST rate and the July 14, 1994 and March 6, 1995 CPST rate increases that were implemented by TKR in the Town. Accordingly, these complaints trigger the Commission's jurisdiction to review TKR's CPST rates under the 1992 Cable Act. In addition, pursuant to the 1996 Act, the local franchise authority, State of New York Department of Public Service ("State") filed a valid complaint on October 24, 1996, regarding TKR's CPST rate increase on June 1, 1996. 7. Upon review of TKR's FCC Form 393, FCC Form 1200, multiple FCC Forms 1210 and FCC Form 1240, we find that TKR charged in excess of its calculated maximum permitted rate or has not correctly calculated its maximum permitted rate beginning November 29, 1993, as discussed in the paragraphs below. 8. FCC Form 393 Filing: On October 4, 1994, TKR filed its FCC Form 393 to justify CPST rates through May 14, 1994. We find that TKR did not correctly calculate its maximum permitted rate on this filing. The correct maximum permitted rate from TKR's FCC Form 393 filing was $10.99 pursuant to our previous rate review of the system for the period from September 1, 1993 to May 14, 1994. 9. FCC Forms 1200, 1210 and 1240 Filings: On July 1, 1994, TKR filed its FCC Form 1200 to justify CPST rates in effect after May 14, 1994. We find that TKR did not correctly calculate its maximum permitted rate on this filing. The correct maximum permitted rate from TKR's previous FCC Form 393 filing was $10.99 pursuant to our rate review for the period from September 1, 1993 to May 14, 1994. We adjusted Module A, Line A6 of TKR's FCC Form 1200 to reflect the corrected previous permitted CPST rate of $10.99. In addition, we corrected Line A1 and Module C, Line C2 to reflect the correct number of CPST channels and the correct number of regulated non-broadcast channels as determined in our previous rate review. These adjustments resulted in a reduction of the maximum permitted rate for CPST to $12.05 from the rate of $12.34 filed by TKR. However, TKR superseded this FCC Form 1200 filing with its first FCC Form 1210 filing. 10. On July 1, 1994, TKR filed an FCC Form 1210 to justify a rate increase of $1.06 effective July 14, 1994. We find that TKR did not correctly calculate its maximum permitted rate on this filing. The correct maximum permitted rate from TKR's previous FCC Form 1200 filing was $12.05. We adjusted Module A, Line A2 of TKR's FCC Form 1210 to reflect the corrected previous permitted rate to $12.05 for CPST. On Module C, Line C2, TKR changed its channel line-up card to reflect 22 channels on the CPST. Accordingly, we have added one channel to the CPST to match the new channel line-up card. Our corrections reduced the maximum permitted rate for CPST from $12.47 to $12.20. Thus, TKR failed to demonstrate that its July 14, 1994 rate of $12.47 for its CPST was not unreasonable. 11. On October 26, 1994, TKR filed an FCC Form 1210 to justify a CPST rate increase of $0.22 effective February 1, 1995. We find that TKR did not correctly calculate its maximum permitted rate on this filing. The correct maximum permitted rate from TKR's previous FCC Form 1210 filing was $12.20. We adjusted TKR's FCC Form 1210 to reflect the corrected previous permitted rate to $12.20 for CPST. Upon review of this FCC Form 1210, we determined that, due to increases in external costs, this filing justified a maximum permitted rate for the CPST of $12.41. Thus, TKR failed to demonstrate that its February 1, 1995 rate of $12.69 for its CPST was not unreasonable. 12. On January 9, 1995, TKR filed an FCC Form 1210 to justify a CPST rate increase of $0.73 effective March 6, 1995. We find that TKR did not correctly calculate its maximum permitted rate on this filing. The correct maximum permitted rate from TKR's previous FCC Form 1210 filing was $12.41. We adjusted TKR's FCC Form 1210 to reflect the corrected previous permitted rate to $12.41 for CPST. Upon review of this FCC Form 1210, we determined that, due to the addition of one channel to the CPST and increased inflation and external costs, this filing justified a maximum permitted rate for the CPST of $13.14. Thus, TKR failed to demonstrate that its March 6, 1995 rate of $13.42 for its CPST was not unreasonable. 13. On February 29, 1996, TKR filed FCC Form 1240 to justify a CPST rate increase of $1.68 effective June 1, 1996. We adjusted Module A, Line A1 of this FCC Form 1240 to reflect the corrected maximum permitted rate of $13.14 brought forward from the prior FCC Form 1210. Our adjustments to TKR's FCC Form 1240 resulted in a reduction of the maximum permitted rate for CPST to $14.18 from the rate of $15.10 filed by TKR. Thus, TKR failed to demonstrate that its June 1, 1996 rate of $15.10 for its CPST was not unreasonable. 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from November 29, 1993 to May 14, 1994, ARE UNREASONABLE. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from July 14, 1994 to January 31, 1995, ARE UNREASONABLE. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from February 1, 1995 to March 5, 1995, ARE UNREASONABLE. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from March 6, 1995 to May 31, 1996, ARE UNREASONABLE. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from June 1, 1996 to the present, ARE UNREASONABLE. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaint against the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from November 29, 1993 to May 14, 1994, IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT DISCUSSED HEREIN. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaints against the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from July 14, 1994 to January 31, 1995, ARE GRANTED TO THE EXTENT DISCUSSED HEREIN. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaints against the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from March 6, 1995 to May 31, 1996, ARE GRANTED TO THE EXTENT DISCUSSED HEREIN. 22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaint against the CPST rates charged by TKR in the Town of Orangetown, New York, CUID No. NY0794, from June 1, 1996 to the present, IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT DISCUSSED HEREIN. 23. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that TKR shall refund to subscribers in CUID No. NY0794 that portion of the amount paid in excess of the maximum permitted CPST rate of $10.99 per month (plus franchise fee), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period from November 29, 1993 to May 14, 1994. 24. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that TKR shall refund to subscribers in CUID No. NY0794 that portion of the amount of the CPST rate increase paid by subscribers that exceeded the maximum permitted CPST rate of $12.20 per month (plus franchise fee), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period from July 14, 1994 to January 31, 1995. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that TKR shall refund to subscribers in CUID No. NY0794 that portion of the amount of the CPST rate increase paid by subscribers that exceeded the maximum permitted CPST rate of $12.41 per month (plus franchise fee), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period from February 1, 1995 to March 5, 1995. 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that TKR shall refund to subscribers in CUID No. NY0794 that portion of the amount of the CPST rate increase paid by subscribers that exceeded the maximum permitted CPST rate of $13.14 per month (plus franchise fee), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period from March 6, 1995 to May 31, 1996. 27. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that TKR shall refund to subscribers in CUID No. NY0794 that portion of the amount of the CPST rate increase paid by subscribers that exceeded the maximum permitted CPST rate of $14.18 per month (plus franchise fee), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period from June 1, 1996 to the day before TKR implements the maximum permitted CPST rate of $14.18. 28. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that TKR Cable Company d/b/a TKR Cable Company of Rockland, in the Town of Orangetown, CUID No. NY0794, revise its calculation of its maximum permitted CPST rate in its next FCC Form 1240 filing. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that TKR shall promptly determine the overcharges to CPST subscribers for the stated periods, and shall within 30 days of the release of this Order, file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount so determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Meredith J. Jones Chief, Cable Services Bureau