********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )  CUID No.  CA0813 (Anaheim)  
                                )          
ML Media Partners, L.P.         )  
Trading as MultiVision Cable TV )
                                )          
Order Denying Jurisdiction      )             

                             ORDER

          Adopted:  February 3, 1997       Released:  February 6, 1997   

By the Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

     1.    In this Order we dismiss complaints about the rate the above-captioned operator 
("Operator") was charging for its cable programming services tier, CPST, in the community
referenced above on the ground that the complaints concerns a rate that is outside the jurisdiction
of the Federal Communication's Commission ("Commission").  Under the Communications Act,
the Commission regulates the CPST rate of cable systems not subject to effective competition upon
the filing of a valid complaint.  Our review reveals that the complaints filed against the Operator,
while asserting that it challenges the rate of the CPST, challenges only the basic service tier. 
Complaints regarding the basic service tier rate is subject to the jurisdiction of the local franchise
authority, and therefore the complaints do not trigger the Commission's jurisdiction.

     2.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules,
47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaints referenced herein against the rates for CPST charged by
Operator in the franchise area referenced in the caption during the period under review, ARE 
DISMISSED.

                                   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 


                                        Elizabeth W. Beaty
                                        Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
                                   Cable Services Bureau