******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) ) CUID No. FL0235 (Sebastian) Falcon Cable Media d/b/a/ Falcon Cable TV) ) ) Order Denying Jurisdiction ) ORDER Adopted: March 20, 1997 Released: March 26, 1997 By the Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order we dismiss a complaint against the rate that the above-captioned operator ("Operator") was charging for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the above- referenced community because the complaint concerns a rate that is outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission"). 2. Under the Communications Act, the Commission regulates the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition upon the filing of a valid complaint. The Complainant asserts that it filed its complaint challenging Operator's September 1, 1993 CPST rate for an a la carte package of services with the Commission on February 28, 1994 by facsimile transmission. The Operator was served with the complaint, but we have no record of this filing. 3. Even if the complaint were filed with the Commission, Operator argues and our review reveals that Operator did not provide regulated cable programming services for the period covered by the complaint. In Falcon Holding Group, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 7267 (1995) ("Falcon Holding Group Order"), we dismissed several complaints regarding the movement of two to six channels from a regulated tier to an a la carte package of services that could be purchased individually or as a package effective September 1, 1993. We determined that the a la carte services could be treated as New Product Tiers not subject to rate regulation consistent with the Sixth Order on Reconsideration, Fifth Report and Order, and Seventh Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 1226 (1994) ("Going Forward Order"). Id. Because Operator offered three channels (TNT, WTBS, The Discovery Channel) which had been moved from a regulated tier and which could be purchased individually or as a package, effective September 1, 1993, in essentially the same way as discussed in the Falcon Holding Group Order, we conclude that the a la carte package of services at issue may also be treated as a New Product Tier not subject to rate regulation consistent with the Going Forward Order. Consequently, the complaint does not trigger the Commission's jurisdiction. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 623(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 543(a)(2)(A) and (B), that the complaint against the CPST rate charged by Operator in the community referenced above, IS DISMISSED. 5. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Elizabeth W. Beaty Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau