NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) CUID No. TX0514 (La Marque) ) TCI Cablevision of Houston ) ) ) Complaint Regarding ) Cable Programming Services Tier Rates) ORDER Adopted: November 26, 1997 Released: November 28, 1997 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order we consider a complaint against the June 1, 1997 rate increase of the above- referenced operator ("Operator") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above. We will address Operator's CPST rates and any potential refund liability for the period prior to June 1, 1997 in a separate order. This Order addresses only the reasonableness of Operator's June 1, 1997 CPST rate increase. 2. Under the Communications Act, the Commission is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates charged are not unreasonable. If the Commission finds a rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") and our rules implementing the new legislation ("Interim Rules"), require that complaints against the CPST rates be filed with the Commission by a local franchising authority ("LFA") that has received more than one subscriber complaint. 3. The LFA for the franchise area referenced above filed a complaint with the Commission on September 9, 1997. The LFA verified that it received more than one subscriber complaint and that the first complaint was received by the LFA on June 5, 1997. The filing of a complete and timely LFA complaint triggers an obligation upon the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates. The Operator has the burden of demonstrating that the CPST rates complained about are reasonable. 4. To justify rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing, operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series. Operators are permitted to make changes to their rates on a quarterly basis using FCC Form 1210. Operators may alternatively justify adjustments to their rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240 to reflect reasonably certain and quantifiable changes in external costs, inflation, and the number of regulated channels that are projected for the twelve months following the rate change. Any incurred cost that is not projected may be accrued with interest and added to rates at a later time. Operator filed FCC Form 1240 as justification for its June 1, 1997 CPST rate increase. 5. On February 23, 1996, the Commission granted Operator a waiver of certain rate adjustment requirements in its initial filing of the Commission's annual rate adjustment form (FCC Form 1240) ("Waiver Order"). Specifically, the Waiver Order allowed Operator, in its initial FCC Form 1240 filings, to include estimated changes in costs, inflation, channels and subscriber information attributable to the period between the last date for which actual cost data was available and the effective date of the new rates. In the Waiver Order, Operator was instructed to include in its initial FCC Form 1240 filing certain calculations, such calculations to be performed on FCC Form 1240 (primarily in Module G), or off FCC Form 1240, in an alternative showing done pursuant to the Waiver Order's "General Guidelines." Operator chose to use an alternative showing rather than perform its calculations directly on FCC Form 1240. 6. To justify its CPST rate, effective June 1, 1997, Operator submitted its second FCC Form 1240. Upon review of this FCC Form 1240, for the projected period June 1, 1997 to May 31, 1998, we are unable to determine if Operator correctly adjusted this FCC Form 1240 to take into account the calculations performed in its initial FCC Form 1240's alternative showing. We will therefore order Operator to refile its FCC Forms 1240 along with an explanation detailing why its forms justify Operator's current CPST rate of $16.70 in the community referenced above. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that Operator shall file with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, within 30 days of the release of this Order, the relevant FCC Forms 1240, and all supporting documentation, to support the monthly CPST rate of $16.70 implemented by Operator on June 1, 1997, in the community referenced above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Meredith J. Jones Chief, Cable Services Bureau