******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Comcast Cablevision ) CUID No. FL0109 (Town of Lantana) of West Palm Beach, Inc. ) ) Complaints Regarding ) Cable Programming Services Tier Rates) ORDER Adopted: February 25, 1998 Released: March 4, 1998 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order we consider complaints concerning the rates of the above-captioned operator ("Operator") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above. Operator's response includes benchmark justifications filed on FCC Form 1200, multiple FCC Forms 1210, and multiple FCC Forms 1240. We have already issued a separate order ("Prior Order") addressing the reasonableness of Operator's rates effective September 1, 1993 through May 14, 1994. This Order addresses the reasonableness of Operator's rates for the period after May 14, 1994, as justified on Operator's FCC Form 1200, multiple FCC Forms 1210 and multiple FCC Forms 1240. 2. Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates charged are not unreasonable. The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992 Cable Act"), and our rules in effect at the time the complaints were filed, required the Commission to review CPST rates upon the filing of a valid complaint by a subscriber. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates. If the Commission finds the rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability. 3. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993. The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994. Cable operators with valid CPST complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that their CPST rates were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994, and that their rates were in compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward. Cable operators attempting to justify their rates for the period prior to May 15, 1994 using a benchmark showing must complete and file FCC Form 393. Operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series to justify their rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994 using a benchmark showing. Cable operators may also justify rate increases based on the addition and deletion of channels, changes in certain external costs, and inflation, by filing FCC Form 1210. FCC Form 1210 must be filed at least 30 days before new rates are scheduled to go into effect where the Commission has found the cable programming service rate to be unreasonable less than one year prior to the filing, or where there is a pending complaint against the CPST rate. Operators may alternatively justify adjustments to their rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240 to reflect reasonably certain and quantifiable changes in external costs, inflation, and the number of regulated channels that are projected for the twelve months following the rate change. Any incurred cost that is not projected may be accrued with interest and added to rates at a later time. 4. The Commission's rules also provide for a refund liability deferral period, if timely requested by Operator, beginning May 15, 1994 and ending July 14, 1994, for any overcharges resulting from Operator's calculation of a new maximum permitted rate ("MPR") on FCC Form 1200. This deferral of refund liability, however, does not apply to refund liability that may have occurred because Operator's March 31, 1994 rates for its CPST subject to regulation were higher than levels permitted under the Commission's rules in effect before May 15, 1994. Accordingly, while the liability period for Operator's overcharges associated with its FCC Form 1200 filing may not begin to run until July 15, 1994, Operator will incur refund liability between May 15, 1994 and July 14, 1994 for any CPST rates charged above the MPR approved by the Commission on Operator's FCC Form 393. In our Prior Order, Operator's FCC Form 393 MPR was set to $12.00. 5. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1200, we that find Operator has justified its maximum permitted rate ("MPR") of $12.60. Therefore, we find that Operator's actual CPST rate of $12.60, effective July 15, 1994 is not unreasonable. 6. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1210 covering the period April 1, 1994 to September 30, 1994, we find Operator has justified its MPR of $12.86, effective October 1, 1994. Because Operator's actual CPST rate of $12.77 does not exceed its MPR, we find that Operator's actual CPST rate of $12.77, effective November 1, 1994 is not unreasonable. 7. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1210 for the period October 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994, we find that Operator has justified its MPR of $13.88, effective January 1, 1995. Therefore,we find that Operator's CPST rate of $13.86, effective February 1, 1995, is not unreasonable. 8. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1210 for the period January 1, 1995 to September 30, 1995, we have corrected the previous number of channels per regulated tier reported in Module E, Line E1 from 15 to 16 for the basic service tier ("BST") and from 29 to 26 for the CPST. Because Operator was not eligible for the 1.0296 inflation factor until October 1, 1995 we have disallowed Operator's inflation adjustment factor of 1.0296 on Line I5 and Line J5. This adjustment reduced Operator's MPR from $14.80 to $14.47. Because Operator's actual CPST rate of $14.78 exceeds its reduced MPR of $14.47, we find Operator's actual CPST rate of $14.78, effective November 1, 1995 to be unreasonable. 9. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1210 for the period October 1, 1995 to December 31, 1995, we have adjusted Module A, Line A2 to reflect the correct previous MPR of $14.47. Also, we have adjusted Module F, Line F1 to reflect Operator's previous FCC Form 1210, Module F, Line F8 which resulted in a change in Operator's Cap Remainder from $0.60 to $0.00. We have also adjusted Line I5 and Line J5 to reflect the appropriate inflation factor of 1.0296. Despite these adjustments, we find that Operator has justified its MPR of $15.21, effective January 1, 1996. Therefore, we find that Operator's actual CPST rate of $14.78, in effect January 1, 1996 through February 29, 1996, and its CPST rate of $15.21, effective March 1, 1996, are not unreasonable. 10. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1240 for the Projected Period November 1, 1996 to October 31, 1997, we find that Operator has justified its MPR of $17.02. Therefore, we find that Operator actual CPST rate of $17.02, effective November 1, 1996 is not unreasonable. 11. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1240 for the Projected Period November 1, 1997 to October 31, 1998, we find that Operator has justified its MPR of $18.77. Therefore, we find that Operator 's actual CPST rate of $18.30, effective November 1, 1997 is not unreasonable. 12. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $12.60, effective July 15, 1994, in the community set forth above, IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $12.77, effective November 1, 1994, in the community set forth above, IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $13.86, effective February 1, 1995, in the community set forth above, IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $14.78, effective November 1, 1995, in the community set forth above, IS UNREASONABLE. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $14.78, effective January 1, 1996, in the community set forth above, IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $15.21, effective March 1, 1996, in the community set forth above, IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $17.02, effective November 1, 1996, in the community set forth above, IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321 that Operator's CPST rate of $18.30, effective November 1, 1997, in the community set forth above, IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 76.961, that Operator shall refund to subscribers in the franchise area referenced above that portion of the amount paid in excess of the maximum permitted CPST rate of $14.47 per month (plus franchise fees), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period November 1, 1995 to December 31, 1995. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Operator shall promptly determine the overcharges to CPST subscribers for the stated periods, and shall within 30 days of the release of this Order, file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount so determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. 22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321, that the complaint referenced herein against the rates charged by Operator in the community set forth above ARE GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John E. Logan Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau