WPC 2a B?Kf Z CG Timesphoenix#6X@DQnӼ@#",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdXdXXXddx|X~d~d|XdddddddC8ddddCdoddd|8|H~d<|8dtddddHHdlLlLlLkd|H|8~ddddddddXXXd~ddkd~ddxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"dhd9dCCzCddoddCdYds]zUvdYYCCCCz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`LHP4Si (Additional); Rm. 900_1; LPT2HPLA4SAD.PRSXw P7\;+OXP2  ?  3|phoenix#6X@DQw@#CG TimesCourier^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCȲY~~wCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYCdddddCCCCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdYYYYYYYd~Y~Y~Y~YddddddddC8C8C8C8oNd~8~8~8~8~8dvddddJJJkNkNkNkN~8~8~8dddddddYYYd~8dJkN~8dddddCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddwooChdF"Ȑdhd岲dCCȐzȲxCddodȐȅdCdYdsȐ]ȐȐȧzȐUwŐdȐYYCCCCΐz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzzzNd88YYYzYzzzzCCdddddddzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzNNNNNNNdddddddddddddddddddd888888888888YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzCs~CzdYCx2$Z"KmHP LaserJet IIISiHPLASIII.PRSXw P7,\,pHXPCG Times (Scalable)Courier 10cpi04-01-96 01:09p April 1, 1996 Government Affairs DivisionGerrit Craig Cone 2hVX Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font11#Xx6X@DQX@##6X@DQ@#8wC;,=9Xw PE37XP<I, nG6X@`7@__:40'A %6HZnLeg2 8  April 1, 1996 Mr. William Caton, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 1919 M Street NW, Room 222 Washington, DC 20554 Re: Open Video Systems, CS Docket No. 9646 Dear Mr. Caton:   KGeneral Instrument Corporation (GI) submits this   Kbrief letter as comments in the abovereferenced   f!Kproceeding. GI's comments are limited to the question of   xKwhether the Commission's Part 68 telephone equipment   Krules and Section 64.702 Computer Inquiry rules should   Kapply to Open Video Systems. GI hereby incorporates by   Kreference its March 18, 1996 comments in CS Docket No.   K95184, dealing with home wiring and customer premises equipment.  KIn its Report and Order and Notice of Proposed   KRulemaking herein ("NPRM"), the Commission has amended   KPart 63 of its Rules to comply with new Section 651 of   f!Kthe Communications Act of 1934, as amended by Section 302   f!Kof the Telecommunications Act of 1996. This was required   Kin order to eliminate the previous requirement that   Kcommon carriers obtain a Section 214 Authorization to   xKoffer a video programming delivery service. NPRM at para. 76.  KHowever, the 1996 Act also requires the Commission to   xKeliminate other "Title IIlike regulation." NPRM at   : Kpara. 5. This includes the customer premises equipment   Kregulations of Part 68 and the network disclosure and   Kequipment unbundling requirements of Section 64.702. In   Kfact, the legislative history specifically calls for the   Kelimination of these regulations. "Section 302(b)(3) of   Kthe conference agreement specifically repeals the   KCommission's video dialtone rules. Those rules"(***v/"   Kimplemented a rigid common carrier regime, including the   f!KCommission's customer premises equipment and Computer III   : Krules, and thereby created substantial obstacles to the   Kactual operation of open video systems." Joint   KExplanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference, at pages 17879 (Section 653(c)(3)).  xKAs we noted in our Comments in CS Docket No. 95184,   Kthere are major technological changes coming in the   Karchitecture of broadband communications networks   Kprovided by cable TV companies and common carriers.   KThese developments could be stifled by regulatory   Kpolicies that deprive network operators of the   f!Kflexibility to deploy network components in a manner that   Kis technically and economically efficient. The   f!KCongressional policy set forth with respect to Open Video   KSystems is consistent with a Congressional purpose to   f!Kpermit the development of new and innovative services and technologies with minimal regulatory intervention.  LKIn light of the above, the Commission should amend   : KSections 64.702 and 68.3 to state that the Commission's   : Kequipment rules and Computer Inquiry rules do not apply to Open Video Systems.  I<  Respectfully submitted,