CORRECTION (to include Docket No.) Report No. DC 95-73ACTION IN DOCKET CASE May 16, 1995 FCC ADOPTS PROPOSAL THAT IT HAS LEGAL AUTHORITY TO GRANT WAIVERS OF THE CABLE-TELCO CROSS-OWNERSHIP BAN TO TELEPHONE COMPANIES SEEKING TO PROVIDE VIDEO PROGRAMMING IN THEIR TELEPHONE SERVICE AREAS (CC Docket No. 87-266) In its Third Report and Order in CC Docket No. 87-266, the FCC adopted its tentative conclusion set forth in the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that it has the legal authority to waive Section 613(b) of the Communications Act, the "cable-telco cross-ownership" ban, to grant waivers allowing telephone companies that abide by certain conditions to provide video programming directly to subscribers in their service areas. In particular, in response to recent decisions by the United States Courts of Appeals for the Fourth and Ninth Circuits, the FCC concluded that under the statute's waiver provision, it has the authority to grant waivers allowing telephone companies to provide video programming in their telephone service areas pursuant to our video dialtone rules. The waiver provision provides that upon a showing of "good cause" the Commission may waive the cable-telco cross ownership restriction where a waiver is "justified by the particular circumstances ..., taking into account the policy" of Section 613(b). Congress enacted Section 613(b) to promote competition, specifically by preventing telephone companies from using their monopoly power to preempt the market for cable service by excluding others from entry. Given that technological advances and other circumstances have changed the multi-channel video programming marketplace significantly since the Commission adopted the cross-ownership restriction in 1970 and Congress codified it in 1984, the Order concludes that "good cause" within the meaning of Section 613(b)(4) exists to allow telephone companies to provide video programming in their telephone service areas. The Order also concludes that allowing telephone companies to provide programming to their subscribers pursuant to the FCC's video dialtone rules constitutes "particular circumstances ..., taking into account the policy" of Section 613(b) because the conditions the Commission has and will establish will promote competition in the multi-channel video programming market. - 2 - In Chesapeake and Potomac Tel. Co. v. United States, 42 F.3d 191 (4th Cir. 1994), the the Fourth Circuit held that the cable-telco cross-ownership restriction is unconstitutional because it "burden[s] substantially more speech than is necessary" to promote the government's interest in a competitive multi-channel video programming market; citing to the Commission's 1992 video dialtone order, the court found that a "less burdensome alternative" to the ban existed. In US West, Inc. v. United States, 48 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 1995), the Ninth Circuit also pointed to the Commission's 1992 video dialtone order, which it described as a "more speech-friendly plan" than the ban that is in place absent a waiver. Construing Section 613(b) as giving the Commission legal authority to grant waivers to allow telephone companies to offer video programming in their service areas over video dialtone networks in effect makes available the "less burdensome alternative" to the ban identified by the Fourth Circuit and implements the "more speech-friendly plan" referenced by the Ninth Circuit. This order thus obviates the constitutional difficulties identified by the courts of appeals. Action by the Commission May 16, 1995 by Third Report and Order (FCC 95- 203). Chairman Hundt, Commissioners Quello, Barrett, Ness and Chong. - FCC - News Media contact: Kara Casey at (202) 418-0500. Office of General Counsel contact: Christopher Wright at (202) 418-1706 and Aliza Katz at (202) 418-1737.