NEWS Report No. CC 97-2 COMMON CARRIER ACTION January 13, 1997 FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON ELIMINATION OF SECTION 214 APPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF LINES UNDER THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996 (CC DOCKET NO. 97-11) The Commission took another step in de-regulating the telecommunications marketplace and continued its implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act). In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released today, the Commission tentatively concludes that carriers should no longer be required to seek Section 214 approval from the Commission before expanding phone services to consumers within any new geographic area they are otherwise eligible to serve. Under the rules proposed in the NPRM, carriers would no longer need Commission certification before constructing, acquiring, operating, or transmitting services over an extension of any line of communication. Under Section 402(b)(2)(A) of the 1996 Act, Congress exempted carriers' line "extensions" from the requirements of Section 214. In this NPRM, the Commission proposes to define such an extension as "any line that allows the carrier to expand its service into geographic territory in which it is eligible to serve, but that its network does not currently reach." Under this definition, the Commission tentatively concludes that carriers would no longer need to seek Commission authorization before expanding their lines of communication into any new geographic area they are otherwise eligible to serve. Previously, carriers were required under Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934 to obtain Commission certification that the extension was consistent with the public convenience and necessity. The NPRM distinguishes between "extensions" and "new" lines, and tentatively concludes that "new" lines will remain subject to the requirements of Section 214. - over - - 2 - In addition, the Commission proposes to forbear from applying its remaining Section 214 authority to carriers who may be subject to price-cap regulation, average schedule carriers, and domestic, nondominant carriers offering local or long-distance services on "new" lines. The NPRM tentatively concludes that, with respect to these classes of carriers, the conditions for forbearance contained in Section 10 of the Communications Act are met in that: (1) enforcement is not necessary to ensure that the charges, practices, classifications, or regulations by, for, or in connection with a carrier or service are just and reasonable and not unjustly or unreasonably discriminatory; (2) enforcement is not necessary to protect consumers; and (3) forbearance is consistent with the public interest because it would promote competitive market conditions and enhance competition among providers of telecommunications services. The Commission also proposes substantial streamlining of the Section 214 application process for domestic, dominant, rate-of-return carriers, and for service discontinuance. In this NPRM, the Commission proposes eliminating two reporting requirements contained in Sections 63.03(e) and 63.04(c) of the Commission rules relating to small projects and temporary or emergency service. Comments relating to the streamlining of Section 214 and the implementation of Section 420(b)(2)(A) of the 1996 are due on February 24, 1997 and replies on March 17, 1997. Action by the Commission, January 9, 1997, by Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-6). Chairman Hundt, Commissioners Quello, Ness and Chong. - FCC - News Media Contact: Jodie Buenning at (202) 418-1500. Common Carrier Bureau Contact: Marty Schwimmer at (202) 418-2334 or Richard R. Cameron at (202) 418-1529.