WPC 2BET Z 3|P ) X0#Xj\  P6G; DXP#HP LaserJet 4/4MScript_230_1HPLAS4.WRSSx  @,, YX@2E@;P(U3|w'Courier New (TT)Times New Roman (TT)Arrus Blk BT (TT)Courier New (TT)Times New Roman (TT)AIIAD.PRSx  @H /wX@Courier New (TT)Times New Roman (TT)Arrus Blk BT (TT)Clarendon BT (Bold) (TT)23vwpk]ka8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# 2ev ta2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# 2k  c   a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# 2  \ $  a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2  VTech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . 2d a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   2A3 =a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:l=?$=@l@Technical 2Technical 2= Technical 3Technical 3> Technical 4Technical 4?` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 1Technical 1@ 28IA$@B$BCDDGTechnical 7Technical 7A` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 8Technical 8B` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#toc 1toc 1C` hp x (#(#`(#`` hp x (#toc 2toc 2D` hp x (#` (#`` (#`` hp x (#2QEjIFKGMHOtoc 3toc 3E` hp x (#` (#` (#` hp x (#toc 4toc 4F` hp x (# (# (#` hp x (#toc 5toc 5G` hp x (#h(#h(#` hp x (#toc 6toc 6H` hp x (#(# (# ` hp x (#2XIvRJRKTLVtoc 7toc 7I toc 8toc 8J` hp x (#(# (# ` hp x (#toc 9toc 9K` hp x (#(#`(#`` hp x (#index 1index 1L` hp x (#` (#` (#` hp x (#24^MYN4[OvR]Pl]index 2index 2M` hp x (#` (#`` (#`` hp x (#toa headingtoa headingN` hp x (#(#(#` hp x (#captioncaptionO _Equation Caption_Equation CaptionP 27bQf^R`SaTafooterfooterQ` hp x (# (#  (# ` hp x (#heading 3heading 3RNPfootnote tex#S']#d6X@C@#HeadingChapter HeadingTJ d  ) I. ׃  2_dUibVcW^cXdcRight ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersU>a݅@  I.   X(# SubheadingSubheadingV0\ E A.  FOOTNOTEFootnote - AppearanceWPHIGHLIGHT 1Italics and BoldldeddX+. 2gYdZe[X>f\1fDRAFT ONHeader A Text = DRAFT and DateY X =8` (#FDRAFTă r  ` (#=D3 1, 43 12pt (Z)(PC-8))T2Dă  ӟDRAFT OFFTurn Draft Style offZ@@    HEADERHeader A - Appearance[LETTER LANDLetter Landscape - 11 x 8.5\ 3'3'Standard'3'3StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11 ;   2k]1g^1*i_1[j`nkLEGAL LANDLegal Landscape - 14 x 8.5]f 3'3'Standard'A'AStandardZ K e6VE L"nu;   LETTER PORTLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11^L 3'3'Standard3'3'StandardZ K e6VE L"nU9   LEGAL PORTLegal Portrait - 8.5 x 14_ 3'3'StandardA'A'StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 119   TITLETitle of a Document`K\ * ă2oa,lbdlcjmd{mBLOCK QUOTESmall, single-spaced, indentedaN X HIGHLIGHT 2Large and Bold LargebB*d. HIGHLIGHT 3Large, Italicized and Underscoredc V -qLETTERHEADLetterhead - date/marginsdu H XX  3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"nE9    * 3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3' II"n"Tv3'StandarddZ K e VE L"nU9 Ѓ   2teEof-qg8>rh8vsINVOICE FEETFee Amount for Math Invoicee ,, $0$0  MEMORANDUMMemo Page FormatfD.   ! M E M O R A N D U M ă r  y<N dddy   INVOICE EXPSEExpense Subtotals for Math Invoiceg:A ,p, $0$00INVOICE TOTTotals Invoice for Math Macrohz 4p, $0$002witjXvk[vl[4wINVOICE HEADRHeading Portion of Math Invoicei+C`*   4X 99L$0 **(  ӧ XX NORMALReturn to Normal TypestylejSMALLSmall TypestylekFINEFine Typestylel2Uzm[wn[xo[wxpxLARGELarge TypestylemEXTRA LARGEExtra Large TypestylenVERY LARGEVery Large TypestyleoENVELOPEStandard Business Envelope with Headerp+w ,,EnvelopeZ K e VE L"n,,EnvelopeLarge, Italicized and Under;    ,, 88+  `   2w|qXzrXzs7{t{MACNormalq,.1rdfStyle 14Swiss 8 Pt Without Marginss$$D Co> PfQ  )a [ PfQO Style 12Dutch Italics 11.5t$$F )^ `> XifQ  )a [ PfQO 2u|vlwxStyle 11Initial Codes for Advanced IIuJ )a [ PfQK  dddn  #  [ X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 ! )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   x )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   j-n )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  jBX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 3oDutch Roman 11.5 with Margins/Tabsv )a [ PfQO  ddn  # c0*b, oT9 !Style 4 PSwiss 8 Point with MarginswDq Co> PfQ  dddd  #  Style 1.5Dutch Roman 11.5 Fontx4h )a [ PfQO  dddn 2y|Nzʄ{j| Style 2Dutch Italic 11.5y$ )^ `> XifQ Style 5Dutch Bold 18 Pointz$RH$L T~> pfQ_  )a [ PfQO Style 7Swiss 11.5{$$V )ao> PfQ ]  )a [ PfQO Style 6Dutch Roman 14 Point|$$N w [ PfQ   )a [ PfQO 2}܆~Style 10oInitial Codes for Advanced} U )a [ PfQK  dddn  ##  [[ b, oT9 !b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   Q" )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  QN~ )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 8PfInitial Codes for Beginningg~i )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9  [ &e )^ `> XifQ ` Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   d )^ `> XifQ Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jH )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  j )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 9Initial Codes for Intermediate )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 Њ [ e )^ `> XifQ ` Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   3 )^ `> XifQ Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jf )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc.`+ >Page  jX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 UpdateInitial Codes for Update Module )a [ PfQK  dddn  #  [ X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Legal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Legal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide   Q" )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`7 CPage  jN~ )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 2N7}3head1 #'d#2p}wC@ #a1Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrf$ a2Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrf/` ` ` a3Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrf:` ` `  2:Ǟ{a4Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfE` ` `  a5Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfP  ` ` ` hhh a6Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrf[   a7Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrff  2|lp6qea8Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfq Document[8]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CC -2( -Ct )B` ` ` Document[4]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CCW -2( -Ct )B  . Document[6]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CCe -2( -Ct )B  2epDocument[5]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CCs -2( -Ct )B  Document[2]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CC -2( -Ct )B*    Document[7]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CC -2( -Ct )B  ` ` ` Right Par[1]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )B8@  2[ڤu Right Par[2]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )BA@` ` `  ` ` ` Document[3]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CC -2( -Ct )B0     Right Par[3]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )BJ` ` ` @  ` ` ` Right Par[4]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )BS` ` `  @  2CʩRight Par[5]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )B\` ` `  @hhh hhh Right Par[6]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )Be` ` `  hhh@ hhh Right Par[7]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers  -2( -Ct )Bn` ` `  hhh@  Right Par[8]C^iRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )Bw ` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp 2-ͪ Document[1]C^iDocument StyleNeF2CCE -2( -Ct )BF34   ׃  Technical[5]C^iTechnical Document StyleCCS -2( -Ct )B&56  . Technical[6]C^iTechnical Document StyleCCa -2( -Ct )B&78  . Technical[2]C^iTechnical Document StyleCCo -2( -Ct )B*9:    2_8Technical[3]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC} -2( -Ct )B';<   Technical[4]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B&=>   Technical[1]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B4?$@     Technical[7]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B&AB  . 2 }tyTechnical[8]C^iTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )B&CD  . Paragraph[1]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )B$ab Paragraph[2]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )B/cd` ` ` Paragraph[3]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )B:ef` ` `  2>ܲ9Paragraph[4]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BEgh` ` `  Paragraph[5]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )BPij` ` ` hhh Paragraph[6]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )B[kl Paragraph[7]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )Bfmn 2*qeParagraph[8]C^i1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )Bqop toatoa` hp x (#` hp x (#2S&C6C^fDocument StyleNF2CC -2( -Ct )s t . 3S&C7C^fDocument StyleNF2CC -2( -Ct ) uv 2ep4S&C8C^fDocument StyleNF2CC! -2( -Ct ) wx 5S&C9C^fDocument StyleNF2CC/ -2( -Ct )*yz   6S&C:C^fDocument StyleNF2CC= -2( -Ct ){|` ` ` 7S&C;C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK -2( -Ct )8}~@  2ǽFv8S&C<C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersY -2( -Ct )A@` ` `  ` ` ` 9S&C=C^fDocument StyleNF2CCg -2( -Ct )0    10S&C>C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersu -2( -Ct )J` ` ` @  ` ` ` 11S&C?C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )S` ` `  @  2n612S&C@C^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )\` ` `  @hhh hhh 13S&CAC^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )e` ` `  hhh@ hhh 14S&CBC^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )n` ` `  hhh@  15S&CCC^fRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers -2( -Ct )w` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp 29x16S&CDC^fDocument StyleNF2CC -2( -Ct )F   ׃  17S&CEC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )&  . 18S&CFC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )&  . 19S&CGC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )*    2)`20S&CHC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )'   21S&CIC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )&   22S&CJC^fTechnical Document StyleCC -2( -Ct )4$     23S&CKC^fTechnical Document StyleCC+ -2( -Ct )&  . 2x[}]24S&CLC^fTechnical Document StyleCC9 -2( -Ct )&  . 25S&CMC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)CG -2( -Ct )$ 26S&CNC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)CU -2( -Ct )/` ` ` 27S&COC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)Cc -2( -Ct ):` ` `  2dH28S&CPC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)Cq -2( -Ct )E` ` `  29S&CQC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )P` ` ` hhh 30S&CRC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )[ 31S&CSC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )f 2`.32S&CTC^f1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)C -2( -Ct )q Default ParaC^fDefault Paragraph Font2CC -2( -Ct );;#PP##PP#_Equation CaC^f_Equation CaptionF2CC -2( -Ct );;#PP##PP#endnote refeC^fendnote referenceF2CC -2( -Ct )>>#PP##PP#2ZdpVfootnote refC^ffootnote referenceF2CC -2( -Ct )>#PP#1, 2, 3,?@65NumbersO@/"=(1*1÷$t ?.E1.A, B,t ?@65Uppercase Letters1 ?*1÷$t ?.E .33`O5hT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5h.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>` ` ` 2qeie334`O5iT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5i.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>  . 35`O5jT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5j.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>  36`O5kT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5k.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>  37`O5lT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5l.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>*   2*ph38`O5mT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5m.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>` ` ` 39`O5nT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>8@   40`O5oT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>A@` `  ` ` ` 41`O5pT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5p.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>0    2"\c42`O5qT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>J` ` @  ` `  43`O5rT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>S` `  @  44`O5sT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>\` `  @hh# hhh 45`O5tT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>e` `  hh#@( hh# 2,T46`O5uT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>n` `  hh#(@- ( 47`O5vT(G2PRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>w` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 48`O5wT(G2PDocument Style&^aO5w.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>F *  ׃  49`O5xT(G2PTechnical Document Stylex.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 2^50`O5yT(G2PTechnical Document Styley.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 51`O5zT(G2PTechnical Document Stylez.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>*    52`O5{T(G2PTechnical Document Style{.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>'   53`O5|T(G2PTechnical Document Style|.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&   2}54`O5}T(G2PTechnical Document Style}.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>4$     55`O5~T(G2PTechnical Document Style~.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 56`O5T(G2PTechnical Document Style.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>&  . 57`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>$ 2C^58`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>/` ` ` 59`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>:` ` `  60`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>E` ` `  61`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>P` ` ` hhh 2 J62`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>[ 63`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>f 64`O5T(G2P1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a).K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>q 65`O5T(G2PDefault Paragraph Font5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>OO#P P##P P#2<2.66`O5T(G2P_Equation Caption^aO5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>OO#PP##PP#67`O5T(G2Pendnote reference^aO5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>RR#PP##PP#68`O5T(G2Pfootnote reference^aO5.K+&,$@`O5Bȗ+&>R#PP#69 _5(_>7footnote text _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+tZP2p q|eeR70 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t` ` ` 71 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t  . 72 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t  73 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t  2p|~74 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t*   75 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t` ` ` 76 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+t8@   77 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+tA@` `  ` ` ` 2KX@78 _5(_>7Document Style _5dK+b70t _5xŗ+t0     79 _5(_>7Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersK+b70t _5xŗ+tJ` ` @  ` `  ?xxxX/Xx6X@DQX@z7PC2X DXP\  P6QXP{l;[87X({[P`  P mQPGmCBX(dXmP`  P mQXPV"G($,hG P7hPH<!, ,< P7,P&z-b81,;b&_ x$&7X"5@^2CRdd$CCdq2C28dddddddddd88qqqYzoCNzoozzC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`l2CC!CCPRCddYYYYYYzYzYzYzYC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddoddYYYYYzYzYzYddddddPdCdCCCdNdz8zRdddCRoNoNNF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<CCYYdCCddCYCdYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddndddddddCCCCŐz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC2 Zp "5^78:nFFT7=7.nnnnnnnnnn::SrkKKown~…|F.FTTgpYt_Ddw?=q=wnspRZIvjcb_TTT7TTTT7TTogggggYr_r_r_r_K?K?K?K?wnnnnvvvv|bgtnn|bnwsgggYYr_r_r_dddwwKoToTTKoTnnZNb7T[8SYYnznMSnIeI::bbT33TT:b=IN=7dYYdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd78:nFFT7=7.nnnnnnnnnn::SrkKKown~…|F.FTTgpYt_Ddw?=q=wnspRZIvjcb_TTTddd:nbTTTn3dddd::bbbTTZ3dd|78nnezT[TMY=T7IITdT7TISYSrrrrKKKK|woggggggY____????nwnnnnnnvvvvbsxxxSxxxxxxxJxxxxJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8xxx8xxx8xxx8xxxxxxxxxxxxxxfi]f]oJiAlJ{SxJ8.uJo]]{JoSxJxf`SfSSiJxJofx]fffxi{8SxxxfJffff88SSSSx{SSSxxxf8`SJ8?xxxX/Xx6X@DQX@z7PC2X DXP\  P6QXP{l;[87X({[P`  P mQP|GmCBX(dXmP`  P mQXP }9iC@X;Xi% p"QX~M+A('X(?hAP`  P mQhP@$6!!X(,6P`  P mQ,PdodȐȅdCdYdsȐ`ȐȐȮzȐUvŐdȐddCCCCŐzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC"5^'(*\Oqw22C6E9)O>O>O>O>hWR6D9D9D9D9-&-&-&-&YGZBZBZBZBZGZGZGZGK;O>\EZBZBK;`BGEO>O>O>R6R6D9D9D9Y<YC6E9)>>>>>W69999&&&&BGBBBBBSBGGGG;EddddddHHH2HHdHHdddHHH,HHHH,HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!HHH!HHH!HHH!HHHHHHHHHHHHHH=?8=8C,?'A,J2H,!F,C8[8J,C2H,H=92=22?,H,C=H8N===H?J!2HHH=,====!!2222HJ222HHH=!92,!d2b 2p"Sh5^18PSS888S8888SSSSSSSSSS88Sddoxd`xx8Jo]oxdxdS]xdd]]888SS8SSJSJ.SS..J.xSSSS??.SJoJJ?JSJSSSSSS8SSSSSSSSS.dSdSdSdSdSooJdJdJdJdJ8.8.8.8.oSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxS]JdSxSxSxS]JxSdSdSdSdSoSoSoSxSdSdSdSdSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSS/SSSSSSSoS]S]S]/]/doSoSxSxSodSdSS?SSSS]S]S]SxSxSxSxSo]S]?8SS888WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxSSS8SMMSSSSSS;SSSS;88SSS..SSffSSxSYSS8SS;"xxSxSxxS哓S88xfxxxxxxxxxxx8SfS]SxoS8SxJS`xlxxxxxxxxxxMxxxxxxofxGcxxxxxxxSxxxxxxxJxxxxJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8xxx8xxx8xxx8xxxxxxxxxxxxxfff]f]oJfA]JxSxJ8.oJo]]oJoSxJxffSfSS]J]Joff]fffffx8Sx]]fJffff88SSSSfxSSS]]]f8`SJ82D^RV"H^BCF$TTdBJB7FFcZZT7Tdd|krRxLJJblWwvrdddBddddBdd|||||krrrrZLZLZLZLv|v|||kkrrrxxxZdddZdlNvBdmCckk]cWyWFFvvd==ddFvJWNJBxkkxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxBCF$TTdBJB7FFcZZT7Tdd|krRxLJJblWwvrdddxxxFvddd=xxxxFFvvvddl=xxBCydmd]kJdBWWdxdBdWckcZZZZ||||||krrrrLLLLv"H^^@?F$QQd@G@8@@qXzQ8Qdd{{d|oLHFFw||eo^uwcddd@dd!ddBRdd}{{{{{dooooXHXHXHXHwwwww{|wwww|{{{dddoooX}d}ddX}zFRweeooNv@d}?qbb\ZTyT44ccd::{{4cGTtGnnyy2Bx7cbbnCzxhcnonvyXzXshn~|yxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@?F$QQd@G@8@@qXzQ8Qdd{{d|oLHFFw||eo^uwcdddxxx4c{{d:xxxx44ccvddo:xx@?yd}d\bGdBTTdxd@dTZbqXXXX}{{{{{{dooooHHHHwwwwwwww|2 hA  [k X4`(#(##c P7{P#у[Պ#c P7{P#X01Í ÍX01Í Í#Xw P7dXP#`5(#SDA 961069  hAX Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION  Z4Washington, D.C. 20554 ă  hAIn the Matter of hhCq) ` `  hhCq)  hmAUS West Communications, Inc.q)  hVAPetition for Computer III Waiverpp) ` `  hhCq)  h( ABellSouth Petition for Waiver ofq)  h AComputer III Rules forhhCq)ppCC Docket No. 90623  h AReverse Search CapabilityhhCq) ` `  hhCq)  h ASouthwestern Bell Telephoneq)  h ACompany Petition for Waiver ofq)  hAComputer III Rules forhhCq)  hAReverse Search CapabilityhhCq)  hBA  MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER  Z94ON RECONSIDERATION ă  hA Adopted: July 2, 1996 hhCqReleased: July 3, 1996 By the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau:  hA+ I. INTRODUCTION ă  hA e 1.` ` On November6, 1995, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau)  x^granted USWest Communications, Inc. (USWest) a limited waiver of the  xCommission's Comparably Efficient Interconnection (CEI) requirements  x.so that USWest could offer a reversesearch capability in conjunction with  h*A xDits electronic white pages (EWP) services.X* l\!4 "ЍUSWest Communications, Inc. Petition for Computer III Waiver, 11 FCC Rcd 1195  l\k"4 x(Com. Car. Bur. 1995) (USWest Waiver Order). The requirement to file a CEI plan was  l\3#4established in the Commission's ComputerIII proceedings. See CEI REQUIREMNT4 & n.CEI REQUIREMNT NOTE11 infra. Ameritech has filed a petition  h A x7for limited reconsideration of the USWest Waiver Order.   l\%4 "MЍAmeritech Petition for Limited Reconsideration, filed December6, 1995 (Ameritech  l\t&4 xPetition). See Public Notice, Report No.2115 (released Dec.13, 1995). On January11,  x1996, BellSouth, CompuServe, and USWest filed comments. Ameritech filed reply comments on January26, 1996. Southwestern  xBell Telephone Company (SWBT) and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc." 0*0*0*\$"  x(BellSouth) also have filed petitions for waiver of the Commission's CEI  xrequirements to offer a reversesearch capability in conjunction with their EWP services.  xPy- v ЍSWBT filed its petition on January 16, 1996, and BellSouth filed its petition on March 1, 1996. Public Notice, DA 9635 (released Jan.19, 1996); Public Notice, DA 96296 (released Mar.5, 1996).  We previously granted BellSouth's waiver petition, in part, in order to  d(#\permit BellSouth to provide reversesearch capabilities solely to the Federal Bureau of  Y-Investigation (FBI).   xP- v ЍBellSouth Petition for Waiver of ComputerIII Rules for ReverseSearch Capability, Order, CC Docket  xPk-No.90623, DA 96674 (Com. Car. Bur. released April29, 1996) (BellSouth FBI Order).   Y- 2.` ` In this Order, we deny Ameritech's petition for reconsideration and grant SWBT  Y- d(#and BellSouth limited waivers of the Computer III CEI requirements to provide reversesearch  Yv- d(#capability in conjunction with their EWP services. vx xP - v ЍThe Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act) creates requirements for entry of the Bell Operating  d(#-Companies (BOCs) into various interLATA services. Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104104, 110  d(#Stat. 56. Pending the outcome of proceedings implementing the requirements of the 1996 Act, we are continuing  xP-to consider waivers under the existing ComputerIII regime. We condition these waivers on the carriers'  Y_- d(#compliance with the Commission's Joint Cost Rules,Q_`  xPp-Ѝ47 C.F.R.  64.901.Q appropriate amendments to the carriers'  YH- d(#;Cost Allocation Manuals (CAMs),zH  xP- v Ѝ47 C.F.R.  64.903(b). See Separation of Costs of Regulated Telephone Service from Costs of  d(#\Nonregulated Activities. Amendment of Part31, the Uniform System of Accounts for ClassA and ClassB  d(#Companies to Provide Nonregulated Activities and to Provide for Transactions Between Telephone Companies and  xPA- d(#Their Affiliates, Report and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 1298 (Joint Cost Order) (1987); modified on recon., 2 FCC Rcd  zP - d(#k6283 (1987) (Joint Cost Reconsideration Order); modified on further recon., 3 FCC Rcd 6701 (1988) (Further  xP-Reconsideration Order); aff'd sub nom. Southwestern Bell Corp. v. FCC, 896 F.2d 1378 (D.C. Cir. 1990).   and compliance with the Computer III customer proprietary  Y1-network information (CPNI) requirements, as amended by the 1996 Act.d12 xP- v {ЍSection CPNI 702 of the 1996 Act adds to the Communications Act a new Section222, which concerns privacy  d(#of customer information. After receiving requests from local exchange carriers (LECs) to clarify their CPNI  d(#obligations, the Commission initiated a proceeding to implement the requirements of Section222, which, to some  xPl- d(#Lextent, modify the ComputerIII CPNI requirements. Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996:  xP4- d(#Telecommunications Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information,  xP- d(#Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No.96115, FCC 96221, 3 (released May17, 1996) (CPNI  xP- d(#NPRM). The Commission noted in its CPNI NPRM that the preexisting CPNI requirements remain in effect to  d(#the extent that they do not conflict with Section222, pending the outcome of the new CPNI rulemaking. The  d(#ZCommission also noted that to the extent that the 1996 Act requires more of a carrier, or imposes greater restrictions  xP"-on a carrier's use of CPNI, the statute, of course, governs. Id.d " 0*(( "Ԍ Y-? II. BACKGROUND ă  Y- 3.` ` The Commission's 1980 Computer II regulatory scheme established two categories  Y- d(#of communications services: basic and enhanced.f  xP5- v ЍAmendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, Final Decision, 77 FCC 2d  xP- d(#384 (1980) (Computer II Final Decision), recon., 84 FCC 2d 50 (1980), further recon., 88 FCC 2d 512 (1981),  xP- d(#aff'd sub nom. Computer and Communications Indus. Ass'n v. FCC, 693 F.2d 198 (D.C. Cir. 1982), cert. denied,  xP-461 U.S. 938 (1983) (referred to collectively as the Computer II proceedings).f The Commission defined basic services as  d(#those that provide a "pure transmission capability over a communications path that is virtually  Y- d(#transparent in terms of its interaction with customersupplied information."G @ xP - v ЍComputer II Final Decision, 77 FCC 2d at 420. "Basic services," such as "plain old telephone service"  d(#x(POTS), are regulated transmission services that are offered under tariff pursuant to Title II of the Communications  xP - d(#.Act of 1934, as amended (the Communications Act). In the NATA Centrex Order, the Commission discussed  d(#ycharacteristics of "adjunct to basic services" that facilitate the use of traditional telephone service but do not alter  xP- d(#the fundamental character of telephone service. See North American Telecommunications Association, Petition for  d(#Declaratory Ruling Under Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules Regarding the Integration of Centrex,  xP- d(#/Enhanced Services, and Customer Premises Equipment, 101 FCC2d 349, 359361, 2328 (1985) (NATA  xPg-Centrex Order), recon., 3FCC Rcd 4385 (1988).G Enhanced services  rare defined as services that employ computer processing applications that act on the format,  rcontent, code, protocol or similar aspects of a subscriber's transmitted information, and provide  rrthe subscriber additional, different, or restructured information, or involve subscriber interaction  Y26with stored information.^ 2  xP$ЍdSee 47 C.F.R.  64.702(a).^  Y 6 Z d4.` ` The requirement to file a CEI plan was first established in the Computer III  Y 6 rproceedingCEI REQUIREMNT,O ` H  xP$  ЍdCEI REQUIREMNT NOTEAmendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, CC Docket No. 85229, Phase  xP$ r<I, 104 FCC 2d 958 (1986) (Phase I Order), recon., 2 FCC Rcd 3035 (1987) (Phase I Reconsideration Order),  xPv$ rnfurther recon., 3 FCC Rcd 1135 (1988), second further recon., 4 FCC Rcd 5927 (1989); Phase I Order and Phase  xP>$ rI Reconsideration Order vacated California v. FCC, 905 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir. 1990); Phase II, 2 FCC Rcd 3072  xP$ r\(1987) (Phase II Order), recon., 3 FCC Rcd 1150 (1988), further recon., 4 FCC Rcd 5927 (1988); Phase II Order  xP$ r" vacated, California v. FCC, 905 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir. 1990) (California I); Computer III Remand Proceeding, 5 FCC  xP$ r&Rcd 7719 (1990), recon., 7 FCC Rcd 909 (1992), pets. for review denied, California v. FCC, 4 F.3d 1505 (9th  xP^$ r Cir. 1993) (California II); Computer III Remand Proceedings: Bell Operating Company Safeguards and Tier 1 Local  xP& $ rExchange Company Safeguards, 6 FCC Rcd 7571 (1991) (BOC Safeguards Order), recon. dismissed in part, Order,  xP $ rnCC Docket Nos. 90623 & 92256, FCC 96222 (released May17, 1996), BOC Safeguards Order vacated in part  xP!$ r4 and remanded, California v. FCC, 39 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 1994) (California III), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1427 (1995)  xP~"$(referred to collectively as the Computer III proceedings). O when the Commission adopted a regulatory framework through which the BOCs  rNcould offer integrated enhanced and basic services, rather than offering them through a separate  Y 6 r2subsidiary. X p xP%$  ЍdIn Computer II, the Commission required the thenintegrated Bell system to provide enhanced services  xP&$ rthrough a structurally separate subsidiary. Computer II Final Decision, 77 FCC 2d at 47586, 23360;  xPp'$ rX Reconsideration Order, 84 FCC 2d at 7586, 72105; 47 C.F.R.  64.702. Following the divestiture of AT&T,"p' 0*(('"  xP$ r\this requirement was extended to the BOCs. Policy and Rules Concerning the Furnishing of Customer Premises  xPX$ rEquipment, Enhanced Services and Cellular Communications Equipment by the Bell Operating Companies, Report  xP $ rand Order, 95 FCC 2d 1117, 1120, 3 (1984), affirmed sub nom. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 740 F.2d  xP$ r465 (1984), affirmed on recon., FCC 84252, 49 Fed. Reg. 26056 (1984), affirmed sub nom. North American  xP$Telecommunications Ass'n v. FCC, 772 F.2d 1282 (7th Cir. 1985). In October 1994, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit remanded" x 0*(( "  Y6 rhportions of the Computer III proceeding to the Commission.x xP)$  .ЍdThe Ninth Circuit found portions of the Commission's Computer III order arbitrary and capricious under  xP$the Administrative Procedure Act. California III, 39 F.3d at 929. During the pendency of the  Y6 rremand,  xPj $  ЍdIn response to the California III decision, the Commission initiated a rulemaking proceeding to review the  xP2 $ rcurrent nonstructural safeguards for BOC provision of integrated enhanced services. Computer III Further Remand  xP $ rProceedings: Bell Operating Company Provision of Enhanced Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 10 FCC Rcd 8360 (1995). and under the requirements of Computer III and the Interim Waiver Order, BOCs are  rRrequired to file CEI plans for each proposed enhanced service offering, or receive a waiver of  rthe Commission's CEI requirements, if they wish to offer an enhanced service on an integrated  Y6 rbasis and the service is not the subject of a previouslyapproved CEI plan.$  xP $  vЍdBell Operating Companies' Joint Petition for Waiver of ComputerII Rules, 10 FCC Rcd 1724 (Com. Car.  xP$Bur. 1995) (Interim Waiver Order), recon., 10 FCC Rcd 13758 (Com. Car. Bur. 1995).$ BOC CEI plans  rare required to demonstrate that the BOCs provide interconnection opportunities to other  rVenhanced service providers (ESPs) on an "equal access" basis, thus making basic facilities  Y_6 rNavailable on an unbundled and functionally equivalent basisEQUAL ACCESS.6 _ xP $  ЍdPhase I Order, 104 FCC 2d at 96465, 103536, 45, 147 & n.210. The CEI plans were required to  rcomply with a series of "equal access" parameters, including requirements that the services be offered at the same  r" tariffed rates the BOCs themselves paid, and that the services offered to ESPs had the same technical characteristics  xPx$and interface functionality as the services used by the BOCs. Id. at 1036, 147.6 These CEI plans, combined with  rour Joint Cost Rules and CAM requirements, are the nonstructural safeguards imposed by the  rCommission, in lieu of structural separation, to prevent the subsidization of enhanced services  Y 6from basic services and discrimination against competing ESPs.   xP$  ЍdComputer III Remand Proceedings: Bell Operating Company Safeguards; and Tier 1 Local Exchange  xP$ rCompany Safeguards, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 174, 175, 9 (1990). For a more  xPS$ rJcomplete review of the history of the Computer II and ComputerIII proceedings, see USWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 119597, 2-10.  Y 6 Z Kd5.` ` In November 1995, we granted a waiver of our CEI plan requirements to  Y 6 rUSWest permitting it to offer a reversesearch capability in conjunction with its EWP services.j  xPf#$ЍdSee generally USWest Waiver Order.j  rKIn that order, we determined that USWest's reversesearch capability is an enhanced service and  Y 6 ris subject to our CEI plan requirements.V p xP&$ЍdId. at 1199, 26.V We concluded that USWest's reversesearch  rcapability met two of the three criteria for an enhanced service: (1)it provided additional"0*(("  rinformation (the name and address associated with a telephone number); and (2)it involved  Y6 r subscriber interaction with stored information.V xPb$ЍdId. at1199, 29.V We conditioned our approval of USWest's  Y6 rwaiver request on its compliance with our Joint Cost Rules, CAM requirements, and Computer  Y6III CPNI requirements, as amended by the 1996 Act.VX xP$ЍdId. at 1200, 34.V  Y6 Z d6.` ` On April29, 1996, we granted BellSouth a temporary limited waiver of the  Yv6 r Computer III CEI requirements so that BellSouth could provide the reversesearch capability  Y_6 r.described in its petition to the FBI.U_ xP $ЍdBellSouth FBI Order.U The temporary waiver took effect immediately and will  rexpire on September30, 1996. The temporary waiver is subject to BellSouth's compliance with  rthe Commission's Joint Cost Rules, appropriate amendment of its CAM, and compliance with  Y 6Computer III CPNI requirements, as amended by the 1996 Act.O x xPC$ЍdId. at 1.O  Y 6L III. DISCUSSION ă  X 6 dA. Ameritech's Reconsideration Petition  Y6 Z d7.` ` Ameritech's Petition. Ameritech seeks reconsideration of the Bureau's  Yz6 rvdetermination that USWest's reversesearch capability is an enhanced service.Yz xP3$ЍdAmeritech Petition at 1.Y It urges the  rBureau to find that the reversesearch capability is an adjunct to basic service because it  rRfacilitates the use of traditional telephone service and merely involves the provision of normal  Y56 r.telephone company record information to subscribers.q5 xP~$ЍdId. at1; Ameritech Reply Comments at23.q Ameritech claims that the US West  Y6 rvWaiver Order adopted an overly narrow interpretation of the Commission's test for an adjunct  Y6 rzto basic service.Y(  xP$ЍdAmeritech Petition at2.Y It asserts that the fact that the reversesearch capability may be used for  rpurposes other than placing telephone calls does not require a finding that the capability is an  r*enhanced service, because this feature also can be used in connection with traditional telephone  Y6 rdservice.y  xP+$$ЍdId. at3. See also BellSouth Comments at4.y Finally, Ameritech asserts that the reverse search capability should be classified as  ran adjunct to basic service because the information provided through this capability is similar"H 0*((t"  r.to that provided through a calling name delivery service, which the Commission has found to  Y6be an adjunct to basic service. xPb$  ЍdAmeritech Petition at45 (citing Rules and Policies Regarding Calling Number Identification Service  xP*$Caller ID, 10 FCC Rcd 11700, 11747, 131 (1995) (CallerID Order).  Y6 Z d8.` ` Comments. BellSouth supports Ameritech's claim that the NATA Centrex Order  rdoes not require that an adjunct to basic service be both necessary for placing telephone calls  Y6 rand incapable of being used for any other purpose.U  xP^ $ЍdBellSouth Comments at14.U BellSouth also contends that the reverse rZsearch capability need not always be used immediately prior to placement of a call to be  r$classified as an adjunct to basic service. It asserts that a number of services previously  rdetermined to be adjunct to basic do not contemplate placement of a telephone call as the  Y16 rRimmediate next step, citing traffic management studies as one example.1 xP$ЍdId. at5 (citing the NATA Centrex Order, 101 FCC 2d at 36465). Finally, BellSouth  Y 6 rcontends that the Bureau should limit its determination in the USWest Waiver Order to  rUSWest's provision of a reversesearch capability. BellSouth urges the Bureau to consider  rBellSouth's and Ameritech's existing offerings of "manual" customer name and address search  Y 6services when determining whether the reversesearch capability is an enhanced service.U @ xP$ЍdBellSouth Comments at57.U  Y 6 Z d9.` ` USWest does not oppose Ameritech's request for reconsideration as long as its  Y6 rability to offer reversesearch remains unaffected.S! xP$ЍdUSWest Comments at23.S USWest, however, does not seek reversal  r*of the Bureau's determination that USWest's reversesearch capability constitutes an enhanced  Yb6 rservice.J"b`  xPs$ЍdId. at5.J USWest disagrees with Ameritech's conclusion that reversesearch must be classified  r as an adjunct to basic service because the Commission already has classified calling name  Y46 rdelivery services as adjunct to basic.D#4  xP$ЍdId.D USWest argues that the determination of whether a  r2reversesearch capability is enhanced or adjunct to basic depends on the particular facts in  Y6question.L$  xP7"$ЍdId. at 56.L  Y6 Z fd 10.` ` CompuServe Incorporated (CompuServe) opposes Ameritech's petition on the  rvground that it only restates arguments raised by BOCs in response to USWest's initial petition  Y6 rfor waiver.T% xPk'$ЍdCompuServe Comments at4.T CompuServe asserts that the purpose of a reversesearch capability is not to"%0*((t "  Y6 r facilitate the placement of telephone calls as required by the NATA Centrex Order, but is to  Y6assist customers in deciding whether to place telephone calls.J& xPb$ЍdId. at6.J  Y6 Z d 11.` ` Discussion. CONCLUSION1We hereby affirm our decision that USWest's reversesearch  Y6 r capability is an enhanced service.s'X xP$ЍdUSWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at1200, 31.s We, therefore, dismiss Ameritech's petition for limited reconsideration.  Y_6 Z d 12.` ` Enhanced services are unregulated services that employ computer processing  rHapplications that: (1)act on the format, content, code, protocol, or similar aspects of a  rDsubscriber's transmitted information; or (2)provide the subscriber additional, different, or  Y 6 r*restructured information; or (3)involve subscriber interaction with stored information.^(  xP$ЍdSee 47 C.F.R. 64.702(a).^ In the  Y 6 rRNATA Centrex Order, the Commission held that, notwithstanding this threepronged test for  renhanced services, carriers may use some of the processing and storage capabilities within their  rnetworks to offer optional tariffed features as "adjunct to basic" services, if the services: (1)are  rintended to facilitate the use of traditional telephone service; and (2)do not alter the fundamental  Y 6 rdcharacter of telephone service.s) x xP$ЍdNATA Centrex Order, 101 FCC 2d 35961, 2328.s Moreover, the Commission concluded that services that are  Y6 radjunct to basic should be directly related to the provision of telephone services.v* xPI$ЍdNATA Centrex Recon Order, 3 FCC Rcd at 4389, 31.v For example,  rthe provision of access to a database for purposes other than to obtain the information necessary  Yb6 rto place a call will generally be found to be an enhanced service.+b xP$ЍdUSWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 1199, 28; NATA Centrex Order, 101 FCC 2d at 360, 25. The presumption regarding  YK6such services, therefore, is that they are enhanced unless they are shown to be otherwise.,K(  xP$$  ЍdUSWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 1199, 28; NATA Centrex Order, 101 FCC 2d at 36061, 26,28.  Y6 Z d 13.` ` In the USWest Waiver Order, we concluded that because USWest's EWP  rreversesearch capability met two of the three criteria for an enhanced service, the new service  rshould be classified as an enhanced service. Specifically, we found that the reversesearch  rservice provides additional information (the name and address associated with a telephone  Y6 rnumber) to subscribers and involves subscriber interaction with stored information.s-  xP$$ЍdUSWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 1199, 29.s No party  r$opposes our determination that USWest's reversesearch capability satisfies two of the  Y6 rRComputerIII tests for an enhanced service. Significantly, USWest does not seek reversal of our determination that its reversesearch capability is an enhanced service."|-0*((H"Ԍ Y6 Z ԙd 14.` `  We remain unpersuaded that the primary purpose of US West's EWP reverse Y6 rsearch service is to facilitate the placement of telephone calls.x. xPb$ЍdUSWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 11991200, 30.x In the NATA Centrex Order,  rthe Commission distinguished between directory assistance (an adjunct to basic service) and AT&T's "Dialit" service ("clearly ... outside the scope of basic service") by stating that:  XdThe only significant difference between Dialit and directory assistance is that the  Platter service provides only that information about another subscriber's telephone  Y_6  number which is necessary to allow use of the network to place a call to that  YH6other subscriber./HX xPQ $ЍdNATA Centrex Order, 101 FCC 2d at 360, 26 (emphasis added).   rdWhile US West's reversesearch service enables customers to avoid calling a number without  rknowing the name and address of the called party, the customer already possesses the telephone  rnumber that is needed to place the call. The additional information gained through the reverse rdsearch capability the name and address is not necessary to make the call. Therefore, we  rconclude that the reversesearch capability is not an adjunct to basic service because it provides  Y 6 rDinformation in addition to that necessary to use the network to place a call (e.g., the other subscriber's telephone number).  Yb6 Z d15.` ` We also find unpersuasive Ameritech's argument that the reversesearch service  YK6 ris analogous to calling name delivery service. In the CallerID proceeding, the Commission  rvconcluded that, for CallerID service only, calling name delivery is an adjunct to basic service  rbecause it "merely provides normal telephone company record information to help the called  Y6 rparty customer identify the calling party before answering the call."p0 xP$ЍdCallerID Order, 10 FCC Rcd at 11747, 131.p Once a customer  rrsubscribes to the service, the caller's name is displayed coincident with the receipt of a telephone  rzcall. Calling name delivery does not require the subscriber to interact with a data base. In  rcontrast, USWest's reversesearch capability requires a subscriber to use a computer connected  rto the public switched network to obtain access to a data base containing the name and address  rassociated with a telephone number and involves both additional information and subscriber  rinteraction with stored information. Moreover, this additional information is obtained from the  rdata base after the call has been completed. Accordingly, we find that US West's reversesearch  YN6 r*capability does not fit within the narrow exception established in the CallerID proceeding. We,  rtherefore, reaffirm our conclusion that USWest's reversesearch capability is an enhanced service.  Y6 Z ,d16.` ` BellSouth claims that the Commission has classified traffic management studies  ras adjunct to basic services notwithstanding that such studies do not contemplate the placement  Y 6 rof a telephone call. Consequently, BellSouth contends that reversesearch services should not  rbe required to satisfy that criterion. We disagree because the relationship between the reverse"!x00*((t""ԫ Y6 rsearch capability and traditional telephone service is significantly more tenuous. In the NATA  Y6 rCentrex Order, the Commission indicated that traffic management studies are an adjunct to basic  Y6 r`service because they are "directly related to management of the customer's telephone service."t1 xPK$ЍdNATA Centrex Order, 101 FCC Rcd at 36465, 36.t  rAccording to BellSouth and Ameritech, the relationship between reversesearch and traditional  r`telephone services is the former's alleged ability to facilitate the placement of a second telephone  rcall. As we have stated, this relationship is too tenuous for us to conclude that the reversesearch capability is an adjunct to basic service.  YH6 Z d17.` ` CONCLUSION2Finally,Ameritech's and BellSouth's existing name and address search services  Y16 rare not relevant to our decision in this proceeding. Our determination in the USWest Waiver  Y 6 r$Order applies to USWest's provision of reversesearch capability.p2 X xP# $ЍdUSWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd 1200, 34.p To the extent that  rAmeritech, BellSouth, or others offer a reversesearch capability that is functionally different  rfrom USWest's offering, we will consider the significance of those differences in the context of proceedings directly applicable to those carriers.  X 6d B. SWBT's and BellSouth's Waiver Petitions  Yy6 Z d18.` ` SWBT and BellSouth (jointly "Petitioners") request waivers that would allow them  rDto offer reversesearch capabilities on an integrated basis with their EWP services because  rtechnological constraints will not allow them to offer the service economically on an equal access  Y46 rNbasis, in accordance with our CEI requirements.g34 xP$ЍdSWBT Petition at3; BellSouth Petition at4.g DirectoryNet, Inc. (DirectoryNet) submitted latefiled comments supporting BellSouth's petition. No party opposes the petitions.  Y6 Z d19.` ` Currently, Petitioners offer EWP services as tariffed basic services.N4x xP$  hЍdSouthwestern Bell Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section69.4(b) of the Commission's  xP$ rJRules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 3792 (Com. Car. Bur. 1990); Southern Bell Telephone and  rTelegraph Company and South Central Bell Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Part69 of the  xPp$ r4 Commission's Rules for Electronic White Pages Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 7121 (Com. Car. Bur. 1990).N These  rvservices allow customers to request the phone number of a telephone subscriber via a personal  Y6 rcomputer and modem.$5(  xP"$  ЍdLetter from Sandra L. Wagner, Director, Federal Regulatory, to William F. Caton, Acting Secretary, FCC,  xPb#$Smith affidavit at 2, dated March15, 1996 (SWBT ex parte letter); BellSouth Petition at2.$ Customers may perform only one search at a time, and may search by  Y6 rname only.g6  xP%$ЍdSWBT Petition at2; BellSouth Petition at2.g Petitioners propose offering the reversesearch service by changing the functions  rof the current EWP service and allowing customers to directly interact with the database" 60*(("  Y6 rNcurrently used for the EWP.{7 xPy$ЍdSWBT Petition at 2; BellSouth Petition, Martin Affidavit at 15.{ Petitioners' reversesearch capabilities are functionally identical  Y6 rԠ i.e., they would allow customers to retrieve subscriber name and address information by  rvproviding a telephone number through a computer interface with Petitioners' EWP databases,  rbut would not allow customers to retrieve a subscriber name or telephone number by providing  Y6only an address.8X xP$ЍdSWBT Petition at2; BellSouth Petition at23. See also DirectoryNet Comments at2.  Yv6 Z d20.` ` Petitioners maintain that these reversesearch services should be classified as  r*adjuncts to basic service. Both, however, have indicated that they will provide these capabilities  YH6 ras enhanced services in compliance with the requirements imposed in the US West Waiver  Y16Order.l9X1 xP $  ЍdSWBT Petition at 4; BellSouth Petition at 3. See US West Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 1195, 1  r (requiring compliance with the Commission's Joint Cost Rules, appropriate amendment of Cost Allocation Manuals, and compliance with Commission CPNI requirements).l  Y 6 Z jd21.` `  COST Petitioners assert that, to provide a service that would comply with the CEI  rrequirements, they would be required to create a separate interface with their existing databases  r that could be used by ESPs. Both carriers contend that competing directory service providers  rdo not require interconnection with their databases to provide a reversesearch capability and  Y 6 r@represent that several companies already offer this service.:   xP`$  dЍdCOMPETITIONSWBT ex parte letter at 1, n.1 (listing Metromail, AT&T/Find America, Fast Data, DirectoryNet and Pro  r&CD as companies which offer competing services in SWBT territory); BellSouth at 4, n.6 (listing DirectoryNet,  rMetromail, First Data Info Source, and Pro CD as companies which offer competing services in BellSouth territory). SWBT indicates that offering a  rstandalone reversesearch capability would not be economical because it would require one to  Yy6 rtwo years to develop and would cost between $500,000 and $1,000,000.[;y  xP$ЍdSWBT ex parte letter at 2.[ BellSouth similarly  rVstates that it would take one to two years and would cost between $900,000 and $950,000 to  YK6 rdevelop a reversesearch capability that would meet the CEI equal access requirements.m<K  xP|$ЍdBellSouth Petition at 4 (citing Martin Affidavit).m  rrBellSouth indicates that it could not justify offering this service as a standalone service, and that  Y6it will not offer this service if it cannot do so on an integrated basis.J= xP"$ЍdId. at 4.J  Y6 Z , d22.` ` Discussion. We conclude that Petitioners' reversesearch capabilities offered in  rhconjunction with their EWP services constitute enhanced services. We conclude that the  rreversesearch capabilities, as described by Petitioners, are functionally the same as those offered  rRby USWest. In fact, Petitioners implicitly acknowledge that their reversesearch capabilities" =0*((>"  rare identical to those of USWest by requesting identical regulatory treatment of those  Y6 r6capabilities.k> xPb$ЍdSWBT Petition at12; BellSouth Petition at12.k Consistent with our determination in the USWest Waiver Order and in  Y6 rparagraphs CONCLUSION111-CONCLUSION217 above, we conclude that Petitioners' reversesearch capabilities employ  rcomputer processing applications that provide subscribers with additional information (the name  rand address associated with a telephone number), involve subscriber interaction with stored  rinformation and are not intended primarily to facilitate traditional telecommunications service.  Yv6We therefore find that Petitioners' EWP reversesearch services are enhanced services.?vX xP $ЍdUSWest Waiver Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 11991200, 2730.  YH6 Z ,d23.` ` The Commission may grant waivers of its rules or orders "if good cause therefor  Y16 rpis shown."N@1 xP $Ѝd47 C.F.R.  1.3.N A showing of good cause requires the petitioner to demonstrate special  rcircumstances that warrant deviation from the rules or orders, and to show how such deviation  Y 6 rwould serve the public interest.A x xP,$ЍdNortheast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). The applicant must clearly demonstrate that the general rule  ris not in the public interest when applied to its particular case, and that the grant of the waiver will not undermine the public policy served by the rule.  Y 6  Z d24. We conclude that Petitioners have established the requisite good cause for granting  Y6 rVlimited waivers of the Computer III CEI requirements. Accordingly, we grant Petitioners  rdwaivers to provide reversesearch services throughout their territories. Significantly, no party  rzopposed granting Petitioners CEI waivers. Moreover, the record indicates that competition  rNalready exists in the directory services market in areas where BellSouth and SWBT offer service  rand that competing providers of these services currently offer reversesearch capabilities as part  Y6 rNof their offerings.qB xP$ЍdSee n.COMPETITION58 supra.q Thus, the record shows that access to Petitioners' offerings is not necessary  rto allow other companies to provide competing reversesearch capabilities. In addition, no party  r*has challenged Petitioners' assertions that compliance with the Commission's CEI requirements  rwould delay introduction of their proposed services for several years and cause them to incur  Y6 rvcosts that would make the offerings uneconomic.aC xP !$  ЍdSee   COST21  supra. Both parties submitted affidavits detailing the technological and financial implications of  xP!$complying with our CEI requirements. SWBT ex parte letter, Smith affidavit; BellSouth, Martin Affidavit. a Finally, Petitioners' compliance with our Joint Cost Rules will protect against unlawful crosssubsidization.  Y|6 Z Td25.` ` We are persuaded that the application of our CEI requirements to Petitioners'  r`provision of reversesearch capability is not in the public interest in this case because compliance  rdwith our requirements is not necessary to allow competing providers to offer this service. We  r conclude that Petitioners have established good cause for granting the requested waiver. We"7 C0*(("  r@limit this waiver to the reversesearch capability as described in their petitions. We condition  rour grant of this waiver on Petitioners' compliance with the Commission's Joint Cost Rules and  Y6CAM requirements,DX xPK$  ЍdJoint Cost Order, Report and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 1298 (1987), Order on Reconsideration, 2 FCC Rcd 6283  xP$ rJ(1987), Order on Further Reconsideration, 3 FCC Rcd 6701 (1988), aff'd sub nom. Southwestern Bell Corp. v.  xP$FCC, 896 F.2d 1378 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See also 47 C.F.R. Parts 32, 64. and the Computer III CPNI requirements, as amended by the 1996 Act.cE xPk$ЍdSee n. CPNI7  supra.c   Y6 V. ORDERING CLAUSES ă   Yw6 Z d26.` ` IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ameritech's Petition for Limited Reconsideration IS DENIED.  Y26 Z  d27.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SWBT's and BellSouth's petitions for a waiver  Y 6 rof the Computer III CEI requirements for the EWP reversesearch capability IS GRANTED subject to the conditions and requirements established herein.  Y 6 Z Td28.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that DirectoryNet's Late Filed Comments ARE ACCEPTED. d` `  hh FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION d` `  hh Regina M. Keeney d` `  hh Chief, Common Carrier Bureau