******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Request for Review ) of the Decision of ) the Universal Service Administrator by ) ) Charlotte County Public Schools ) File No. SLD-109845 Charlotte Court House, Virginia ) ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: October 8, 1999 Released: October 8, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. The Common Carrier Bureau has under consideration a request dated May 14, 1999 from Charlotte County Public Schools (Charlotte). Charlotte seeks a waiver of Commission rules to allow consideration of its application as timely filed within the filing window established by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) for the second funding year of the schools and libraries support mechanism. SLD denied Charlotte's application for discounted services under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism because Charlotte's FCC Form 471 was received after the 1999-2000 filing window closed on April 6, 1999. For the reasons that follow, we deny Charlotte's request for waiver. 2. SLD received Charlotte's FCC Form 471 on April 7, 1999, one day after the filing window closed on April 6, 1999. Accordingly, by card postmarked April 12, 1999, SLD informed Charlotte that, because its FCC Form 471 was received outside of the filing window, its application would be considered on a first-come, first-served basis along with other applications received outside of the window. In its May 14, 1999 filing, Charlotte requested a waiver to allow its application to be considered as having been filed within the filing window. Charlotte stated that it mailed its FCC Form 471 on April 3, 1999, via the United States Postal Service, with a guaranteed delivery date of April 5, 1999. In support of this claim, Charlotte enclosed a letter of explanation from the Postmaster of the Phenix, Virginia Post Office indicating that Charlotte's FCC Form 471 was incorrectly prepared by the U.S. Postal Service, resulting in a delivery date that fell outside of the SLD's filing window. 3. We deny Charlotte's waiver petition. SLD is authorized to establish and implement filing periods for FCC Form 471 applications by schools and libraries seeking to receive discounts for eligible services. For the second funding period, the filing window opened on December 1, 1998 and closed on April 6, 1999. Although the Commission may waive any provision of its rules, a request for waiver must be supported by a showing of good cause. In this case, although Charlotte faults the U.S. Postal Service for the late delivery of its application, we conclude that this is an insufficient basis for waiver. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each funding year, we believe it is administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should be granted only in very limited circumstances. In this regard, the Commission has previously stated that it would not grant requests for waiver based on claims that copying machines, delivery services, or, in most cases, inclement weather or illness, were responsible for an untimely filing. Although unexpected, these circumstances are reasonably forseeable and applicants should allow enough time in meeting deadlines to account for such unanticipated delays. Moreover, Charlotte had an alternative means for filing its application. The instructions for completing FCC Form 471 provide that the form may be mailed or filed electronically and state specifically that applicants "are encouraged to complete and submit this form electronically." We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Charlotte has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its request for waiver must be denied. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the petition for waiver filed May 18, 1999 by Charlotte County Public Schools IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa M. Zaina Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau