******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Request for Review of the ) Decision of the ) Universal Service Administrator by ) ) Hartshorne Independent School District ) SLD-136718 Hartshorne, Oklahoma ) ) Swink School District 21 ) SLD-138828 Swink, Oklahoma ) ) Tyrone Independent School District 53 ) SLD-138918 Tyrone, Oklahoma ) ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: February 7, 1999 Released: February 8, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. The Common Carrier Bureau has under consideration a Joint Letter of Appeal filed on October 4, 1999 by Hartshorne Independent School District 1, Hartshorne, Oklahoma, Swink School District 21, Swink, Oklahoma, and Tyrone Independent School District 53, Tyrone, Oklahoma (Appellants), seeking review of decisions issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC or Administrator). The Joint Letter of Appeal seeks review of the SLD's processing of applications for discounted services under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. Prior to the time that Appellants filed their appeal with the Commission, however, Appellants also filed individual appeals with the Administrator. Those appeals remain pending. As explained below, we dismiss Appellants' Joint Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. 2. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of the SLD's decisions do not contemplate simultaneous appeals to the Commission and the Administrator. In this case, as noted above, Appellants have individual appeals pending before the Administrator. Therefore, we dismiss Appellants' Joint Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Appellants' individual appeals, Appellants may then appeal to the Commission if they believe such appeal is warranted at that time. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Joint Letter of Appeal filed by Hartshorne Independent School District 1, Hartshorne, Oklahoma, Swink School District 21, Swink, Oklahoma, and Tyrone Independent School District 53, Tyrone, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau