******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Carl Schurz High School Chicago, Illinois Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. SLD-143629 CC Docket No. 96-45 CC Docket No. 97-21 ORDER Adopted: January 30, 2001 Released: January 31, 2001 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. The Bureau has under consideration a Letter of Appeal filed by Carl Schurz High School (Carl Schurz), Chicago, Illinois, on May 23, 2000, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). Carl Schurz seeks review of the SLD's denial of its appeal in which Carl Schurz sought to amend its discount percentage under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Letter of Appeal. 2. Under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism, eligible schools, libraries, and consortia that include eligible schools and libraries, may apply for discounts for eligible telecommunications services, Internet access, and internal connections. The universal service program rules are designed to direct support toward the most economically disadvantaged schools and libraries. Under the program's discount matrix, the most economically disadvantaged schools, as measured by the percentage of students eligible for the national school lunch program, are eligible for the greatest levels of discount. In order to receive discounts on eligible services, schools and libraries are required to provide specific information to the Administrator. As part of this process, the applicant must provide information in block 4 of FCC Form 471 to determine the appropriate discount percentage. 3. By letter dated August 17, 1999, SLD granted Carl Schurz's application for discounts at the 80 percent discount percentage as indicated on its FCC Form 471. On September 10, 1999, Carl Schurz filed an appeal with SLD indicating that the company responsible for compiling its application had erroneously calculated its discount percentage in block 4 of FCC Form 471. Carl Schurz stated that its application should be amended to reflect a higher discount rate of 90 percent. By letter dated April 27, 2000, SLD denied Carl Schurz's appeal indicating that the funding decision was based on information submitted by Carl Schurz, and that Commission rules "prohibit the funding of discounts that are greater than what was submitted on the original 471." Carl Schurz appeals this decision. 4. We have reviewed Carl Schurz's appeal and conclude that SLD properly denied its request to amend the approved discount percentage. The record indicates that SLD reasonably relied upon the information submitted by Carl Schurz in block 4, item 14 and block 5, item 16 of its FCC Form 471. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for correctly calculating and reporting its discount percentage in completing the FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. It was Carl Schurz's own error that caused it to be approved for a smaller discount than that which it may have otherwise been entitled. In addition, because demand for support has generally exceeded the availability of funds, it is important to the administration of the program that applicants provide accurate information regarding funding requests. The Administrator must be able to reasonably estimate the total demand for support submitted by applicants during each filing period in order to make determinations regarding the availability of funding. We therefore conclude that SLD correctly denied Carl Schurz's appeal. 5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Carl Schurz High School on May 23, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau