******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2001 Released: February 27, 2001 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. On January 23, 2001, the Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) in CC Docket No. 96-45, seeking comment on implementation of the Children's Internet Protection Act (the CHIP Act), which was signed into law on December 21, 2000 as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 (Pub. L. 106-554). The FNPRM directed that comments regarding the CHIP Act be submitted to the Commission within 15 days of publication of the FNPRM in the Federal Register, with reply comments due seven days later. The FNPRM was published on January 31, 2001. Comments therefore were due on February 15, 2001, and reply comments were due by February 22, 2001. On February 15, 2001, the American Library Association (ALA) submitted a Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments. 2. In its pleading, the ALA requests that the Commission extend the period of time for filing reply comments in this matter for seven days, through March 1, 2001. Noting the brief comment cycle, the ALA states that the extension is necessary in order to adequately obtain and analyze others' comments, obtain views from its own members, and prepare reply comments. The ALA suggests that the quality of the rules adopted by the Commission would be improved if affected parties could have additional time in which to analyze the comments of others and respond thoughtfully. 3. We deny the ALA's request for an extension of the February 22, 2001 date for filing reply comments. Although the current pleading schedule is compressed, we do not believe that we can extend the filing date for reply comments without compromising the Commission's ability to meet the implementation schedule mandated by Congress, which requires that the Commission have rules governing implementation of the CHIP Act in effect by April 20, 2001. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments filed by the American Library Association is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau