******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In reply refer to: RAO Letter 14 Released: September 28, 1989 Responsible Accounting Officers: Re: Classification of Inside Wiring Services for Accounting Purposes In National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. FCC, No. 86- 1678 (D.C. Car. July 7, 1989) (NARC v. FCC), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded the Commission's decisions preempting state regulation of inside wiring services for further proceedings. This letter instructs carriers to continue classifying inside wiring services as nonregulated for accounting purposes pending Commission action in those proceedings. Section 32.23(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  32.23(a), describes the circumstances under which carriers are to classify their activities as nonregulated for accounting purposes. That section provides, among other items, that preemptively deregulated activities must be classified as nonregulated activities. Prior to the decision in NARC v. FCC, carriers had relied on this provision in classifying all their inside wiring services as nonregulated for accounting purposes. Section 32.23(a) also provides that activities that have been deregulated at the interstate level, but not preemptively deregulated, are to be classified as regulated activities until such time as the Commission decides otherwise. Several carriers have inquired whether this provision mandates that they reclassify their inside wiring services as regulated for accounting purposes. Such a reclassification would subject costs incurred in providing inside wiring services to the jurisdictional separations process and could result in changes in carriers' interstate revenue requirements. Reclassification might also require costly changes in the carriers' internal accounting systems and cost allocation manuals. We believe it appropriate to resolve the carriers' questions and to avoid the consequences described above during the period that the regulatory status of inside wiring is under consideration. Accordingly, we require that all subject carriers continue to classify all inside wiring services as nonregulated for accounting purposes pending Commission action on remand of NARC v. FCC. See Separation of Costs of Regulated Telephone Service from Costs of Nonregulated Activities, Report and Order, CC Docket 86-111, 2 FCC Rcd 1298 79 (1987) (Joint Cost Order), recon., 2 FCC Rcd 6283 (1987) (Reconsideration Order), further recon., 3 FCC Rcd 6701 (1988) (Further Reconsideration Order), petition for review pending, Southwestern Bell Corp. v. FCC, D.C. Circuit No. 87-1764 (filed Dec. 14, 1987). This letter is issued pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.291. Applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.115, must be filed within 30 days of the date of this letter. See 47 C.F.R.  1.4(b)(2). Sincerely, Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting and Audits Division