******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Unicare Corporation ) ) and ) ) Rudy Khatchatourian, ) ) ) Complainants, ) ) v. ) File No. E-99-03 ) Caprock Communications Corp., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Adopted: December 22, 1999 Released: December 23, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On November 17, 1998, complainants UniCare Corporation and Rudy Khatchatourian (collectively, UniCare) filed the above-captioned complaint against Caprock Communications Corp. (Caprock), alleging that Caprock violated sections 201(b) and 258(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 64.1100 and 64.1150 of the Commission's rules by making unauthorized changes to the service provider and Responsible Organization for the toll-free vanity number assigned to UniCare, and by terminating UniCare as the customer of record for that number. 2. On December 21, 1999, UniCare Corporation and the Estate of Rudy Khatchatourian and defendant Caprock (collectively, Petitioners), filed a joint motion to dismiss UniCare's pending complaint against Caprock with prejudice. Petitioners state that they have reached a mutually agreeable settlement of the above-captioned dispute, and that further Commission action is therefore unnecessary. 3. Upon review of the joint motion to dismiss and the entire record herein, we believe that the grant of the motion and the dismissal of this complaint with prejudice will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and conserving the Commission's and Petitioners' resources. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b) and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 208, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.111, 0.311, that the joint motion to dismiss the above-captioned complaint with prejudice IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above- captioned complaint proceeding IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the proceeding IS TERMINATED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective immediately upon release thereof. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Alexander P. Starr Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau