******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the ) ET Docket No. 98-206 Commission's Rules to Permit Operation of) RM-9147 NGSO and FSS Systems Co-Frequency with) RM-9245 GSO and Terrestrial Systems in the Ku-Band) Frequency Range ) and ) Amendment of the Commission's Rules to) Authorize Subsidiary Terrestrial Use of the) 12.2-12.7 GHz Band by Direct Broadcast) Satellite Licensees and Their Affiliates) ORDER Adopted: February 4, 1999 Released: February 5, 1999 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: 1. On February 1, 1999, the Boeing Company ("Boeing") submitted a motion to the Commission to extend the comment and reply comment dates in the above captioned proceeding. Boeing states that it would like to incorporate into their comments detailed technical information being developed by the International Telecommunications Union, Radiocommunication Bureau, Joint Task Group 4-9-11 ("JTG 4-9-11"). Boeing argues that since a JTG 4-9-11 meeting recently concluded on January 29, 1999, commenters have little more than two weeks to analyze the outputs of the meeting and incorporate them into their comments. Boeing believes that extending the comment and reply comment dates by two weeks would permit parties to engage in a more in depth analysis of the JTG 4-9-11 information. 2. Although the Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time in rule making proceedings, we find that Boeing has demonstrated that providing more time will enable all interested parties to submit additional information that will be materially beneficial to the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the date for filing comments and reply comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to March 2, 1999, and March 29, 1999, respectively. 3. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR  0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology