******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In Re Petition of ) MCI Worldcom, Inc. ) ) for Declaratory Ruling Pursuant ) File No. ISP-PDR-19990802-00007 to Section 63.16 of the Commission's ) Rules to Provide Switched Services Via ) International Private Lines Interconnected ) to the Public Switched Network Between ) The United States and Singapore ) DECLARATORY RULING AND ORDER Adopted: November 23, 1999 Released: November 23, 1999 By the Chief, Telecommunications Division: INTRODUCTION 1. On August 2, 1999, MCI Worldcom filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling pursuant to section 63.16 of the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) seeking a ruling that authorizes MCI Worldcom to provide switched services between the United States and Singapore via international private lines interconnected with the public switched network at one or both ends (International Simple Resale or ISR). Specifically, MCI Worldcom contends that the requirements in the Commission's rules to provide ISR have been satisfied. In particular, MCI Worldcom claims that: (1) Singapore is a Member country of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and that (2) at least fifty percent of U.S.-billed traffic on the U.S. Singapore route is being settled at or below the applicable benchmark rate. Therefore, MCI Worldcom requests that we approve the provision of ISR on the U.S.-Singapore route. 2. After placing the Petition on public notice on August 11, 1999, we received comments from Singapore Telecommunications Limited (SingTel), a foreign carrier presumed to possess market power in Singapore. SingTel states that it filed comments to make certain that the status of ISR in Singapore is accurately reflected in the record. According to SingTel, ISR is currently prohibited in Singapore. DISCUSSION 3. Singapore is a Member country of the WTO; therefore, a U.S.-authorized carrier seeking to provide ISR on the U.S.-Singapore route must either comply with the benchmark condition set forth in rule 63.16(b)(1) or demonstrate that equivalent resale opportunities are available to U.S. carriers in the foreign country. In this case, we determine that the benchmark condition, which requires that at least fifty percent of the U.S.-billed traffic on the route is settled at or below the relevant benchmark, has been met. 4. We find that the accounting rate modifications we have accepted for the U.S.-Singapore route that MCI Worldcom and AT&T filed are compliant with the Commission's benchmark rate of $.15 cents for Singapore. Because of the volume of traffic AT&T and MCI Worldcom handle in aggregate, at least fifty percent of the U.S.-billed traffic on the route is being settled at or below the applicable benchmark settlement rate adopted in the Commission's Benchmarks Order. Therefore, we find the request of MCI Worldcom to be in accordance with rule 63.16(b)(1) and our policies regarding the provision of ISR. 5. Our expectation is that the provision of ISR on the U.S.-Singapore route, if permitted by the relevant authorities in Singapore, would allow U.S. and Singaporean carriers to route traffic between countries outside of the traditional settlements system to the benefit of consumers in the U.S. and Singapore through lower calling prices, more service options, greater consumer demand for services, and increased technological innovation. For these reasons, Commission policy promotes the use of ISR to the extent possible, consistent with the need to prevent one-way bypass that harms U.S. consumers. In approving this petition, however, we are finding solely that the petition complies with Commission policies and regulations. We make no determination as to whether parties may actually implement the terms of an agreement. As a result of this approval, all carriers authorized by the Commission to provide ISR on other routes may also provide ISR on the U.S.-Singapore route. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that MCI Worldcom's request for the approval of ISR between the U.S. and Singapore satisfies Section 63.16, 47 C.F.R. 63.16, and is consistent with the policies set forth in the Foreign Participation Order and the Benchmarks Order and is in the public interest, and therefore GRANTED. 7. It is further ORDERED that MCI Worldcom's Petition for Declaratory Ruling is GRANTED. 8. This Order is issued under Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.261, and is effective immediately. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.106 and 1.115 respectively, may be filed within 30 days of the date of public notice of this Order (see 47 C.F.R.  1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief, Telecommunications Division International Bureau