January 6, 1994 Press Statement of Commissioner James H. Quello On January 3, 1995, I sent a letter to the Honorable Larry Pressler, Chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee, expressing in some detail my concerns about certain aspects of the procedures the Commission staff was then using to pursue its investigation into the ownership structure of the Fox Broadcasting Company. My principal concern in this regard centered on the public impression of bias and prejudgement these procedures had inadvertently created. Yesterday, I joined in a unanimous vote of the Commission adopting a letter to Fox indicating that, after reviewing the current procedures for the conduct of this inquiry, we are confident that the proceeding is being handled by the staff in a "fair, objective and impartial manner, consistent with the handling of all Commission investigations." I added my vote to those of my colleagues in light of the good faith efforts the staff has now taken to correct the unfortunate misimpression previously created regarding the conduct of the investigation. Specifically, these steps are: (1) the original overbroad confidentiality order has been significantly narrowed in scope; (2) in response to my concern that the attorney-client privilege not be invoked by the staff to bar relevant testimony of current and previous Commission officers and employees, I have been assured by the staff that the privilege will not be invoked to prevent the parties from interviewing such individuals; and (3) perhaps most importantly, I am now being provided with copies of documents related to the investigation upon request, including the December 7, 1994 letter to Fox posing additional questions. In light of these steps, I now feel confident that the inquiry is being conducted in a fair and impartial manner. It is now time to move forward, and to bring this investigation to a conclusion as quickly as possible. Both the Commission investigators and the parties should cooperate in working toward this goal. I will, as before, continue to monitor closely the conduct of this proceeding to ensure that there are no missteps, by any of those involved, that would prejudice or delay this proceeding.