Kim Blackseth 

Dear Sirs: 
I have the following comments on the subject proceeding: 

1. I don't believe the Section 255 "broad objectives" are accomplished with 
range of services that this proposed FCC rule is limited to. Please consider 
a wider range of services. (paragragh 42) 

2. I would urge the "readily achievable" requirements adopted be similar to 
those in the ADA Title III. As proposed, the effects of the economics 
jeoprodize the access elements from being provided. Its clear market pressures 
alone have not worked to ensure access in the past. 


Kim Blackseth