NEWSReport No. DC 95-31 ACTION IN DOCKET CASE February 16, 1995 COMMERCIAL REALTY ST. PETE AND PRINCIPALS ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THEY SHOULD NOT BE BARRED FROM FUTURE AUCTIONS (WT DOCKET 95-26) As a result of an investigation initiated August 30, 1994, regarding the conduct of bidders at the Interactive Video and Data Services (IVDS) auctions, the Commission has ordered Commercial Realty St. Pete, Inc., and its principals, James C. Hartley, Teresa Hartley, and Ralph E. Howe, to show cause why they should not be barred from participating in any future Commission auctions and from holding any Commission licenses. The Commission also authorized the Administrative Law Judge who will preside at the hearing to impose forfeitures if it is concluded that Commercial Realty and/or its principals misrepresented facts to the Commission during the IVDS application process. Commercial Realty is a for-profit company incorporated in Florida. From the time of its incorporation until 1989, James C. Hartley served as its sole director, President, and Registered Agent. Ralph E. Howe is identified on company documents filed with the Florida Department of State as the current director, President, and Registered Agent. On February 17, 1994, Mr. Hartley's wife, Teresa Hartley, purchased all the outstanding shares of stock in Commercial Realty for $500. On June 23, 1994, Commercial Realty filed with the Commission an application to participate in the IVDS auctions, certifying that it was a woman-owned small business and that it was legally, technically and financially qualified as an applicant. The certification was signed by Mr. Howe, who identified himself as a director of Commercial Realty. Commercial Realty was the successful bidder in 20 IVDS markets, claiming bidding credits in the 17 markets where they were available. Its total bids were $41,2500,000, adjusted to $32,762,500 with bidding credits. It was required to submit deposits of $3,266,750 to the Commission within five business days after the July 28 and 29 auctions. Commercial Realty failed to tender any down payment and therefore was in default. The Commission's investigation disclosed that Commercial Realty had violated the FCC's anti-collusion rules regarding the auction by sharing information with other parties, and had misrepresented its financial qualifications and designated entity status. By a separate action, the Commission has notified Commercial Realty that it is apparently liable for a forfeiture of $390,000 for these violations and misrepresentations. (over) - 2 - The Commission said it appeared that Commercial Realty and its principals have engaged in serious misconduct that calls into question their basic qualifications to hold a Commission license. If such misconduct is established, Commercial Realty and its principals will be prohibited from participating in future actions and will be deemed to lack the requisite character qualifications to hold a Commission license. The Commission designated these issues for hearing before an FCC Administrative Law Judge at a time and place to be set in a future order. Action by the Commission February 15, 1995, by Order to Show Cause (FCC 95-59). Chairman Hundt, Commissioners Quello, Barrett, Ness and Chong. - FCC - News Media contact: Stacey Reuben Mesa at (202) 418-0600. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau contacts: Joseph Weber at (202) 418-1317 and Myron Peck at (202) 418-1310.