Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 95-124 In the Matter of) ) PR Docket No. 94-105 Petition of People of the State of California and ) the Public Utilities Commission of the State of ) California to Retain Regulatory Authority Over ) Intrastate Cellular Service Rates) ORDER Adopted: January 30, 1995; Released: January 31, 1995 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. The People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California (collectively, California) have filed an emergency motion for an extension of time from the January 27, 1995 deadline for filing revised versions of its petition and accompanying appendices, until Thursday, February 2, 1995. For the reasons given below, we grant California the relief requested. 2. Section 332(c)(3) of the Communications Act preempts state rate and entry regulation of commercial mobile radio services. States exercising intrastate rate regulation may nevertheless petition the Commission to retain rate regulatory authority. California filed such a petition on August 9, 1994. 3. On January 25, 1995, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau adopted and released an Order regarding treatment of requests for confidential treatment of information in the state petition proceedings, including a request by California that the Commission accord proprietary treatment to certain materials that it redacted from its publicly filed petition and appendices, and included in a separate version filed under seal with the Commission. In that Order, the Bureau ordered California to file two new versions of its petition and appendices, one for public viewing and one for viewing under the terms of a protective order, in accordance with Bureau determinations of confidential status set forth in the Order. 4. California orally notified Commission personnel of its intention to file the Motion, and submitted the Motion by facsimile January 26, 1995. The state asserts that as a practical matter, California cannot complete its revised filings to comply with the January 25 Order before Wednesday, February 1, 1995, for filing with the Commission, via overnight mail, on Thursday, February 2, 1995. Specifically, the state states that it must conduct a line-by-line revision of Appendices G and H, as well as text accompanying those appendices, and must revise the fifty-page Appendix J and corresponding text, among other tasks. California notes that it must then reproduce the revised filings, comprising hundreds of pages, and serve those new versions upon twenty-two parties. 5. The required revisions are complex, and accuracy is important to avoid the potential for competitive harm to any of the parties whose information is involved. We recognize the burden of revising several hundred pages in an accurate fashion within several days, and the need to perform the revisions without error. Further, California, respecting the Commission's need to complete action rapidly in light of an impending statutory deadline, requested only a four day extension of time. For these reasons, we find that the Motion sets forth good cause for extension of the deadline, and we grant the requested four day extension of time, pursuant to delegated authority and Section 1.46(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.46(b). Accordingly, California must make the filings specified in paragraph 44 of the January 25 Order prior to the close of the business day at the Commission on February 2, 1995. 6. Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.46, we GRANT the Emergency Motion of the People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California for an Extension of Time TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. This Order is issued under delegated authority and, in order to meet the statutory deadline set forth in Section 332(c)(3)(B) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(3)(B), is effective upon adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Regina M. Keeney Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau