$//Order,Arch Capitol District,Inc.,DA 95-447//$
                               Before the
           FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION    DA 95-447
                          Washington, DC 20554



In the Matter of              )
                    `         )
Arch Capitol District, Inc.   )
     Complainant,             )
                              )
          v.                  )    File No. WB/ENF-F-95-002
                              )
Professional Communications,  )
     Inc.                     )
     Defendant                )


ORDER
              
                             Adopted: March 3, 1995         Released: March 14, 1995

  By the Chief, Enforcement Division, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau:

  1. On December 27, 1994, Arch Capitol District, Inc ("Arch")
filed the above-captioned formal complaint against Professional
Communications, Inc. ("ProCom"). The complainant alleged that
ProCom had unreasonably restricted services to Arch's customers
in violation of Sections 201(a), 201(b) and 202(a) of the
Communications Act and Section 22.514 of the Commission's Rules.

  2. On February 15, 1995, Arch filed a pleading titled,
"Dismissal Of Formal Complaint", in which it asserts that the
parties hereto have agreed upon a settlement resolving this
dispute as well as other litigation between them. Arch asserts
that the settlement will resolve the service problems which are
the subject of its complaint herein. Arch purports to dismiss its
complaint, contingent upon the Commission's grant of certain
applications in related proceeding subject to the settlement
agreement. In light of its evident purpose, we will treat Arch's
instant pleading as a motion to dismiss.

  3. We are satisfied that the dismissal of the complaint and
the termination of this proceeding will serve the public interest
by eliminating the need for further litigation and expenditure of
further time and resources of the parties and the Commission.

  4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that complainant's
motions IS GRANTED.

  5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to complainant's
request, the above-captioned complaint IS DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE and that the proceeding IS TERMINATED.

                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

                            
                                                                                                          
                              Howard C. Davenport
                              Chief, Enforcement Division
                              Wireless Telecommunications Bureau