******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Application of ) ) AMERICAN PAGING, INC. ) (OF OKLAHOMA) ) ) For New Paging Facility )File No. 27948-CD-P/ML-01-94 To Operate On The 931.1125 MHz ) Frequency in Little Rock, Arkansas ) ORDER Adopted: January 7, 1998 Released: January 7, 1998 By the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division: 1. By this action, the Commercial Wireless Division denies American Paging, Inc.'s (of Oklahoma) ("API") petition for reconsideration ("Petition") of the grant by the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (formerly Narrowband Branch) of its application for a new paging facility on frequency 931.1125 MHz at Little Rock, Arkansas. 2. On July 20, 1994, API filed an application for a new paging service facility to operate on frequency 931.1125 MHz at Little Rock, Arkansas. The Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch granted API a construction permit for a new paging facility to operate on frequency 931.3625 MHz as API's requested frequency was unavailable. On March 15, 1996, API filed its Petition seeking reconsideration of the assigned frequency, and requested assignment of its preferred frequency, 931.1125 MHz. 3. Section 22.31(b)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules requires an applicant to file its mutually exclusive application within sixty days of the date of the public notice listing the first of the conflicting applications as accepted for filing. In response to API's Petition, the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch determined that API's preferred frequency had already been assigned to Skytel Corporation, whose application was filed on January 1, 1994. Skytel Corporations' application was accepted for filing on February 23, 1994 (Skytel filing window). Since API's application was received after the Skytel filing window closed, the available frequency, 931.1125 MHz, was assigned to an applicant who submitted its application in the Skytel filing window. 4. Additionally, applicants are not entitled to their requested frequency. Section 22.501(p)(2) allows an applicant to specify a frequency. However, the Commission is not bound by such requests. Accordingly, we deny API's Petition. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i) and 405, authority delegated by sections 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.331, and pursuant to section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.106, the Petition for Reconsideration filed on March 15, 1996, by American Paging, Inc. (of Oklahoma) IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David L. Furth Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau