Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document Attachment

DOC-326347A4

STATEMENT OF

COMMISSIONER JESSICA ROSENWORCEL

Re:
Amendment of the Rules Related to Retransmission Consent, MB Docket No. 10-71,
Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (March 31, 2014)
Few Americans have heard of the term “retransmission consent.” It is one of those
wonky and lawyerly things we bandy about in these halls and in this town. Fewer still know that
more than two decades ago Congress prohibited retransmitting a broadcast television station’s
signal without the station’s consent—and at the same time directed parties negotiating for this
consent to do so in “good faith.”
But far too many Americans know what happens when retransmission consent
negotiations go wrong.
First, it is pretty clear to consumers that something is not right when they turn on the
television for the news, their favorite show, or the game, and instead get saddled with a dark
screen. They may not know how and why retransmission consent negotiations between
broadcasters and their cable or satellite company have failed, but they know a blackout means
they are not getting the programming they paid for. When this happens, I think they are owed a
refund.
Second, it is pretty clear to consumers that what they pay for television programming
packages goes up too far too fast. I am under no illusion that retransmission consent is the main
driver of increased programming costs. But it is a piece of a larger system that deserves
attention.
So it is for these two reasons—the incidence of extended blackouts and the creep upward
of rates—that I support today’s action. By limiting joint negotiations by local broadcasters, I am
hopeful we can reduce the extent of retransmission consent blackouts. I am also hopeful we can
help keep consumer rates more level. Because the record reflects that when stations jointly
negotiate, retransmission consent fees are higher, and those higher charges get passed on to
consumers. So I think our efforts today are a good development—not only because I am a
regulator, but because I am a consumer who watches and pays bills, too.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, , or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.