Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document Attachment

DOC-328173A3

image01-00.jpg612x792

STATEMENT OF

COMMISSIONER MIGNON L. CLYBURN

Re: Closed Captioning of Internet Protocol-Delivered Video Programming:

Implementation of

the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010; Closed

Captioning of Internet Protocol-Delivered Video Clips, MB Docket 11-154

As Victor Hugo famously noted, there are few things more powerful than an idea whose time has

come.

When Congress passed the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of

2010 — better known as CVAA, it marked a bold step in insuring that all individuals, particularly

those with hearing disabilities, could enjoy the full benefits of modern communications

technology.

Our action today represents yet another step towards full implementation of CVAA. In

reconsidering the Commission’s earlier interpretation of the statute, we concluded that Congress

intended the IP closed captioning requirements to extend to all covered video programming beyond

television, including video clips. Among other things, Congress left it to the discretion of the FCC

to determine an appropriate timeline for compliance with this requirement.

The item accomplishes these objectives.

As a prelude to where we are today, we must acknowledge that considerable work has already

gone into developing a compliance regimen on IP captioning. Industry has sought to work

cooperatively with key stakeholders, and has achieved quite a respectable level of compliance in

voluntarily captioning video clips. For these efforts, the industry should be commended and

encouraged to keep moving forward.

However, even with that impressive level of progress, it became clear that those with hearing

disabilities were still not experiencing the full benefits that every American expects today. That is

what motivates me to support this item.

As our society moves ever steadily to an all-IP environment, we must be mindful not to create

divides — even if they are unintended. After all, we will be remembered for our actions, not

necessarily our good intentions. We should not, and do not want to, create a system where those

with hearing disabilities are left to their own devices when it comes to their media engagement —

even if that content appears in short video clips beyond the television platform. For instance, in

emergency situations we need to ensure that every member of the community has access to vital

information.

This item seeks to close that divide where it currently exists, and attempts to make sure that such a

fissure does not grow in the video ecosystem. And while it is not perfect it will put us ever closer

to where we want and need to be.

I know there has been a healthy discussion concerning the recommended time frame for

image02-00.jpg612x792

implementing this order, especially as it relates to the burdens and costs on video programmers for

captioning “montage” clips. I am sensitive to the concerns of industry when it points out a need

for more time, for it is clear that the captioning process in the IP framework is much more complex

than captioning on video.

But that alone should not be an impediment to full implementation. I am more than confident that

industry’s willingness to comply with this item is superseded only by its tremendous capacity to

create and innovate. Therefore, I am hopeful that neither time nor technical issues will obstruct our

march toward full participation and engagement by all Americans.

I would like to acknowledge the concerns raised by my colleague, Commissioner O’Rielly, with

respect to potential hardships on small broadcasters — however we may define “small”. I share

those concerns, and am sure that there is no shortage of small broadcasters who are not as well-

equipped to tackle this requirement, compared to their larger counterparts.

So I greatly appreciate the efforts by the Chairman to address these concerns because we all should

remember that there is a bottom-line difference in the way small broadcasters and large

broadcasters go about doing business. And we should remain mindful of imposing any additional

burdens on those least able to shoulder them.

Finally Mr. Chairman, I want to acknowledge the patience, persistence and perseverance of the

advocates from the deaf and hard of hearing community. In the best and finest tradition of our

participative democracy, they have pressed their case for full inclusion. Their non-stop efforts to

sensitize those of us with different abilities to the day-to-day issues they face have been nothing

short of heroic. And until we completely close these gaps, Mr. Chairman, our work is not done.

And of course, I want to thank the Media Bureau, the Consumer and Governmental Affairs

Bureau, the Office of General Counsel, my law clerks Sharon Lin and Laura Arcadipane and my

advisor, Adonis Hoffman, for their work on this item.

2

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, , or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.