Comment Sought on Domestic 214 Transfer of Oxford T&T-Oxford Holdings
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500445 12th St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Released: February 12, 2014
DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION FILED FOR THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF
OXFORD COUNTY TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES TO
OXFORD NETWORKS HOLDINGS, INC.
STREAMLINED PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED
WC Docket No. 14-12
Comments Due: February 26, 2014
Reply Comments Due: March 5, 2014
Telephone Company (Oxford), Oxford West Telephone Company (Oxford West), Oxford County
Telephone Service Company (Oxford Service), Northeast Competitive Access Providers, LLC
(Northeast), and Revolution Networks, LLC (Revolution), (collectively, the Oxford Companies), and
Oxford Networks Holdings, Inc. (Oxford Holdings), (collectively, Applicants) filed an application
pursuant to section 63.03 of the Commission’s rules1 to transfer control of Oxford T&T (the direct parent
of Oxford, Oxford West and Oxford Service, and the super-majority owner of Northeast and, indirectly,
Revolution)2 to Oxford Holdings.
Oxford provides incumbent local exchange and exchange access services to approximately 4,293
access lines in the exchanges of Buckfield, Turner, North Turner, Sumner, Canton and West Paris, Maine.
Oxford West provides incumbent local exchange and exchange access services to approximately 5,100
access lines in the exchanges of Hebron, Bryant Pond, Bethel, West Bethel, Roxbury Pond, Locke Mills,
North Norway, Andover, and Upton, Maine. Oxford Services provides competitive local exchange and
exchange access services to approximately 14,093 access lines located within exchanges of the LEC
operating territory of Fairpoint. Revolution is certified to provide competitive local exchange service in
New Hampshire and Maine. Neither Oxford Services nor Revolution offer competitive local exchange
services within the certificated territory of any independent local exchange company (including within the
1 47 C.F.R § 63.03; see 47 U.S.C. § 214. Applicants also filed applications for transfer of control associated with
authorization for international services. Any action on this domestic section 214 application is without prejudice to
Commission action on other related, pending applications. Applicants filed a supplement to their application on
February 5, 2014.
2 Oxford T&T owns 99% of the membership interest in Northeast; Oxford Service, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Oxford T&T, owns the remaining 1%. Revolution is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northeast. Oxford T&T,
Oxford, Oxford West, and Oxford Service are Maine corporations. Northeast and Revolution are each a limited
liability companies organized under the laws of the state of Delaware.
Oxford Companies’ incumbent local exchange territory). Each local exchange company also provides
broadband services to its local exchange customers.
Oxford T&T (doing business as Oxford Long Distance and as Oxford Networks) offers
interexchange carrier (IXC) services (domestic and international) to the local service subscribers of
Oxford, Oxford West, and Oxford Services. As an IXC, Oxford T&T currently serves approximately
19,212 interstate customers (and 18,966 intrastate customers). Oxford T&T, which wholly owns Oxford,
Oxford West and Oxford Services, is a widely held company. Richard Schotte, a U.S. citizen holds a 10.1
percent equity interest in Oxford T&T. Northeast serves as a carrier’s carrier, offering transport services
through its fiber facilities from Boston to Bangor and multiple points in between.
Oxford Holdings, a Delaware corporation, and its affiliates do not offer domestic
telecommunications services. The following entities hold a 10 percent or greater equity interest in Oxford
Holdings: Novacap Technologies III, L.P. (Novacap III) (67 percent), Canadian entity and BSCP-OX
Holdings, a U.S. based entity, LLC (18 percent). BSCP-OX Holdings, LLC is controlled by its sole
managing member, Thadeus Mocarski, a U.S. citizen. Novacap III, which holds approximately 67
percent of the equity of Oxford Holdings, is controlled by its managing partner, Novacap Partners
Technologies III, L.P. (Novacap Partners). The general partner of Novacap Partners is Novacap
Management.3 According to the Applicants, Novacap III has numerous limited partners, only one of
which is required to be reported, La Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (La Caisse).4 La Caisse will
hold an indirect passive interest of approximately fifteen percent of the equity of Holdings.
Pursuant to the proposed transaction, Oxford Holdings proposes the purchase of all of the
ownership interests of Oxford T&T through a reverse triangular merger, resulting in the survival of
Oxford T&T as a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Oxford Holdings. After the proposed transaction,
Oxford T&T, together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, will continue to exist and operate in their
respective service territories, and under the same trade names, providing service pursuant to existing
rates, terms and conditions. Applicants assert that the proposed transaction is entitled to presumptive
streamlined treatment under section 63.03(b)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s rules and that a grant of the
application will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity.5
Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of Oxford County Telephone
& Telegraph Company to Oxford Networks Holdings, Inc., WC Docket No. 14-12 (filed Jan. 16,
GENERAL INFORMATIONThe transfer of control identified herein has been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for
filing as a streamlined application. The Commission reserves the right to return any transfer application
3 The following Canadian citizens and entity hold a ten percent or greater interest in Novacap Management: Marc
Beachamp, Alain Bélanger, Pierre McMaster, Pascal Tremblay, Stéphane Tremblay, and Administration PM-Strem
Inc. (owned by Stéphane Tremblay and Pierre McMaster).
4 La Caisse was formed by an act of the National Assembly of Québec in 1965 and is an investment management
organization that invests and manages institutional funds, primarily from public and private pensions and insurance
funds in Québec. The following Canadian citizens comprise La Caisse’s Board: Robert Tessler, Michael Sabla,
Elisabette Bigsby, Louise Charette, Patricia Curadeau-Grou, Michèle Desjardins, Rita Dionne-Marsolais, Giles
Godbout, Denys Jean, Francois Joly, Jean LaCouture, Francois R. Roy, and Ouma Sananikone.
5 47 C.F.R. § 63.03(b)(1)(ii).
if, upon further examination, it is determined to be defective and not in conformance with the
Commission’s rules and policies. Pursuant to section 63.03(a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR §
63.03(a), interested parties may file comments on or before February 26, 2014, and reply comments on
or before March 5, 2014. Pursuant to section 63.52 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.52,
commenters must serve a copy of comments on the Applicants no later than the above comment filing
date. Unless otherwise notified by the Commission, the Applicants may transfer control on the 31st day
after the date of this notice.
Pursuant to section 63.03 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR § 63.03, parties to this proceeding
should file any documents in this proceeding using the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System
In addition, e-mail one copy of each pleading to each of the following:1) Tracey L. Wilson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau,
2) Dennis Johnson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau,
3) David Krech, Policy Division, International Bureau, mailto:email@example.com; and
4) Jim Bird, Office of General Counsel, firstname.lastname@example.org.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities
(braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to email@example.com or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty).
The proceeding in this Notice shall be treated as a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after
the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making
oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all
persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was made,
and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to
such data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant
page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them
in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are
deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b), 47 C.F.R. §
1.1206(b). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte
For further information, please contact Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 or Dennis Johnson at
- FCC -
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.