Comment Sought on Domestic 214 Transfer of Sage Telecom to TSC
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500445 12th St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Released: May 8, 2012
DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION FILED FOR THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF
SAGE TELECOM, INC. TO TSC ACQUISITION CORPORATION
STREAMLINED PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED
WC Docket No. 12-119
Comments Due: May 22, 2012
Reply Comments Due: May 29, 2012
LP (Sage-TX) and TSC Acquisition Corporation (TSC Acquisition) (collectively, Applicants) filed an
application pursuant to section 63.03 of the Commission’s rules1 requesting approval for the transfer of
control of Sage from SP Sage to TSC Acquisition.
Sage, a Texas corporation, is authorized to provide competitive local exchange and/or
interexchange services in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas,
Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North
Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and
Wyoming.2 Sage-TX, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sage and a Texas limited partnership, is authorized
to provide competitive local exchange and interexchange services in Texas.3 Sage is a wholly owned
subsidiary of SP Sage, a Delaware limited liability company.
TSC Acquisition, a Delaware corporation, does not provide telecommunications in any state.
TSC Acquisition’s operating subsidiary, Telscape Communications, Inc. (Telscape), provides service in
Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, and Texas. TSC Acquisition is
owned by GP/T Holdings, LLC (57 percent ownership), Gemini Partners, Inc. (17 percent ownership) and
other investors (none of whom individually directly or indirectly own ten percent or more of TSC
1 47 C.F.R § 63.03; see 47 U.S.C. § 214. Applicants also filed an application for transfer of control associated with
authorizations for international services. Any action on this domestic section 214 application is without prejudice to
Commission action on other pending applications. Applicants filed a supplement to their application on May 8,
2 Sage provides telecommunications service in each of those state except Colorado, Florida, Kentucky, Montana,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah,
Washington and Wyoming. Sage is in the process of surrendering its authorizations in Nebraska and Utah, where it
does not currently provide service.
3 Sage Telecom of Nevada LLC is the limited partner (99 percent) of Sage-TX and is wholly owned by Sage.
Acquisition). The following U.S. entities directly own or control a ten percent or greater equity or voting
interest in TSC Acquisition: GP/T Holdings, LLC (57 percent) and Gemini Partners, Inc. (17 percent).
The following U.S. individuals each hold a fifty percent or greater ownership interest in, and share control
of Gemini Partners, Inc., and 45 percent ownership interest in and share control of GP/T Holdings, LLC:
Matthew Johnson (62 percent) and Nathan Johnson (62 percent).
Pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, TSC Acquisition will purchase all of the outstanding
stock of Sage held by SP Sage. GP/T Holdings, LLC, a California limited liability company, will, in turn,
hold an indirect interest of approximately 57 percent in Sage and Sage-TX. Applicants state that the
proposed transaction is entitled to presumptive streamlined treatment under section 63.03(b)(2)(i) of the
Commission’s rules4 and that a grant of the application will serve the public interest, convenience, and
Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of Sage Telecom,
Inc. to TSC Acquisition Corporation, WC Docket No. 12-119 (filed Apr. 30, 2012).
GENERAL INFORMATIONThe transfer of control identified herein has been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for
filing as a streamlined application. The Commission reserves the right to return any transfer application
if, upon further examination, it is determined to be defective and not in conformance with the
Commission’s rules and policies. Pursuant to section 63.03(a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR §
63.03(a), interested parties may file comments on or before May 22, 2012, and reply comments on or
before May 29, 2012. Pursuant to section 63.52 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 63.52,
commenters must serve a copy of comments on the Applicants no later than the above comment filing
date. Unless otherwise notified by the Commission, the Applicants may transfer control on the 31st day
after the date of this notice.5
Pursuant to section 63.03 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR § 63.03, parties to this proceeding
should file any documents in this proceeding using the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System
In addition, e-mail one copy of each pleading to each of the following:
1) Tracey Wilson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau,
2) Dennis Johnson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau,
3) David Krech, Policy Division, International Bureau, email@example.com; and
4) Jim Bird, Office of General Counsel, firstname.lastname@example.org.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities
(braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to email@example.com or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty).
4 47 C.F.R. § 63.03(b)(2)(i).
5 Such authorization is conditioned upon receipt of any other necessary approvals from the Commission in
connection with the proposed transaction.
The proceeding in this Notice shall be treated as a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex parte rules.6 Persons making ex parte presentations must file a
copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two
business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies).
Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation
must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s written comments, memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the
presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or
other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be
found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission
staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed
consistent with rule 1.1206(b), 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
For further information, please contact Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 or Dennis Johnson at
6 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq.
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.