Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Commissioner Pai Statement on the Breakdown of E-Rate Negotiations

Download Options

Released: July 8, 2014
image01-00.jpg612x792

NEWS

Federal Communications Commission

News Media Information 202 / 418-0500

445 12th Street, S.W.

Internet: http://www.fcc.gov

Washington, D. C. 20554

TTY: 1-888-835-5322

This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action.

See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974).

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

July 8, 2014

Matthew Berry, 202-418-2005

Email: matthew.berry@fcc.gov

STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER AJIT PAI

ON THE BREAKDOWN OF E-RATE NEGOTIATIONS

Any good math teacher would give the FCC’s E-Rate proposal an “F” because the

numbers just don’t add up. It promises over $5 billion for Wi-Fi but doesn’t identify where the

money will come from to fund this new program. As it stands, the proposal will blow a $2.7

billion hole in E-Rate’s budget—one that the FCC has promised outside parties it’ll fill with a

post-election increase in Americans’ phone bills.

The proposal also doesn’t pass the test in other respects. Rather than giving small, rural

schools and libraries a fair shake, it continues to direct the bulk of E-Rate funds to large, urban

school districts.

Rather than fundamentally reforming the E-Rate bureaucracy, the plan doubles down on

complexity. Schools and libraries will still have to file reams of paperwork, operate on

Washington’s timeline, and hire consultants—that is, if they participate in the program at all.

Rather than giving local school boards, principals, teachers, and librarians the flexibility

to decide what services and technologies best meet their communities’ particular needs, the plan

takes a Washington-knows-best mindset.

I have been deeply engaged in this process since this item was circulated. I reached out

to the Chairman’s Office one week ago with a list of changes designed to address my concerns. I

have repeatedly made myself and my staff available to explain the rationale for my proposals and

to find a middle ground. I did all this because I wanted to support this item—because I believe,

as I said almost exactly one year ago, that “E-Rate is a program worth fighting for.”

I was willing to meet the Chairman’s Office more than halfway, but today, they rejected

almost every suggestion that I made. Unfortunately, the Chairman’s Office has no interest in

seriously negotiating with the Republican Commissioners and is determined to pass this item on

a party-line vote.

I am disappointed that this is becoming the Commission norm on high-profile items. But

I’m even more disappointed for America’s teachers, librarians, parents, students, and library

patrons, many of whom I’ve met over the past many months, who will have to wait years more

for 21st-century digital opportunities—for real E-Rate reform.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.