Commissioner Pai Statement on the Breakdown of E-Rate Negotiations
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D. C. 20554
This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action.
See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974).
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:
July 8, 2014
Matthew Berry, 202-418-2005
STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER AJIT PAI
ON THE BREAKDOWN OF E-RATE NEGOTIATIONS
Any good math teacher would give the FCC’s E-Rate proposal an “F” because the
numbers just don’t add up. It promises over $5 billion for Wi-Fi but doesn’t identify where the
money will come from to fund this new program. As it stands, the proposal will blow a $2.7
billion hole in E-Rate’s budget—one that the FCC has promised outside parties it’ll fill with a
post-election increase in Americans’ phone bills.
The proposal also doesn’t pass the test in other respects. Rather than giving small, rural
schools and libraries a fair shake, it continues to direct the bulk of E-Rate funds to large, urban
Rather than fundamentally reforming the E-Rate bureaucracy, the plan doubles down on
complexity. Schools and libraries will still have to file reams of paperwork, operate on
Washington’s timeline, and hire consultants—that is, if they participate in the program at all.
Rather than giving local school boards, principals, teachers, and librarians the flexibility
to decide what services and technologies best meet their communities’ particular needs, the plan
takes a Washington-knows-best mindset.
I have been deeply engaged in this process since this item was circulated. I reached out
to the Chairman’s Office one week ago with a list of changes designed to address my concerns. I
have repeatedly made myself and my staff available to explain the rationale for my proposals and
to find a middle ground. I did all this because I wanted to support this item—because I believe,
as I said almost exactly one year ago, that “E-Rate is a program worth fighting for.”
I was willing to meet the Chairman’s Office more than halfway, but today, they rejected
almost every suggestion that I made. Unfortunately, the Chairman’s Office has no interest in
seriously negotiating with the Republican Commissioners and is determined to pass this item on
a party-line vote.
I am disappointed that this is becoming the Commission norm on high-profile items. But
I’m even more disappointed for America’s teachers, librarians, parents, students, and library
patrons, many of whom I’ve met over the past many months, who will have to wait years more
for 21st-century digital opportunities—for real E-Rate reform.
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.