Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Commissioner Rosenworcel Remarks at the APCO Emerging Tech Conference

Download Options

Released: December 4, 2013

REMARKS OF

COMMISSIONER JESSICA ROSENWORCEL

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

APCO EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

DECEMBER 4, 2013

Good afternoon. Thank you Derek Poarch for that kind introduction. Thank you also to
APCO for having me here in Boston today. This is always a great event. But this conference
was made truly special with remarks yesterday from Boston public safety officials.
For me, it is fitting to join you in Boston during the holiday season. I am a born and bred
New Englander. That means I like the snow; believe water at the beach should give you a proper
chill when you swim; and believe that maple syrup, lobster, and fried clams are the best stuff on
earth—in that order. But more importantly, I know what it is like to root for the Red Sox—
during seasons when the World Series is not in reach. In short, coming to New England is
coming home.
It is also appropriate that I am joining the public safety community this time of year.
Because spending time with APCO and its members feels like seeing family around the holidays
. . . and I actually mean that in a good way.
I have enjoyed spending time with so many of you over the past year and a half in office.
As many of you know, my very first speech after being sworn in was at the APCO Annual
Conference in Minneapolis. During that first speech I committed to spend my inaugural year in
office visiting 9-1-1 call centers across the country. I feel privileged to say I have been able to
hear from so many of you personally.
Plus, every visit is time well spent. Because in Washington what is trite is true: leaving
town is a good thing. Staying in town means getting caught up in debates that are untethered
from the real world. Sitting down with public safety officials in urban areas, rural areas, and
everything in between reminds me that our policies can have real effect on real lives. It reminds
me that the people who answer our 9-1-1 calls are everyday heroes. Because when crises mount,
they answer their phones with steely calm and help ensure that help is on the way. I know.
Because I’ve seen it.
It also reminds me that there are gaps in our present policies that deserve our attention,
our efforts, and our commitment to step up and address. After all, doing so will give those
everyday heroes more and better tools to do their job. And that can make us all safer.
But rather than dive straight into policy, I want to take the next few minutes to tell some
of your stories. Then I’ll close with one of my own.

First, let me take you back to the summer before last. A fast-moving storm known as a
Derecho blew through the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic. These were not the usual warm winds of
late June. These were gusts of up to 80 miles per hour. And they were accompanied by sheets of
rain and bolts of lightning.
The damage left in the wake of the Derecho was substantial. This was Mother Nature at
her most angry. We had downed trees, blocked roads, power outages—and serious failures in
our communications systems.
The problems at our 9-1-1 call centers were especially stunning. At too many public
safety answering points, there was an eerie quiet in the aftermath of the storm, as calls into 9-1-1
quickly and implausibly ceased. Public safety experts immediately suspected there was
something wrong. It turns out they were right.
During the Derecho, 77 public safety answering points spanning six states lost some
connectivity. This affected more than 3.6 million people. Seventeen 9-1-1 call centers lost
service completely. This left more than two million people without access to 9-1-1 during and
after the storm.
It was many hours before calls returned—and in some cases days. This is unacceptable.
It puts the safety of too many people at risk. The numbers I just shared with you make this clear.
But the point was driven home to me in my visits to call centers that experienced the storm,
especially those run by APCO members Steve Souder and Carol Adams.
I am proud to say that testifying before the House of Representatives, I said we needed an
investigation by the Federal Communications Commission into 9-1-1 service following the
Derecho. Because when things like this happen we have to search out the facts—wherever they
lead. Then we need to apply the lessons we learn. Not just in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic
where the Derecho struck—but everywhere.
I am prouder still to say that the staff at the FCC has done extraordinary work to
understand what happened. They worked with carriers, reached out to public safety officials,
and combed through lots of paper. As a result, we now know that as many as nine generators
failed to start, disabling hundreds of network transportation systems. We know that back-up
generators and switches failed. We also know that power failures undermined network
monitoring capabilities.
So we understand what did not go right. Now we need to do something about it. That is
where I have good news to report. As soon as next week the FCC is poised to adopt new policies
to improve the reliability of 9-1-1 and continuity of communications networks. I am grateful that
our new Chairman, Tom Wheeler, has made this a priority so early in his tenure. His efforts
have my full support. I am hopeful that the action we take will help make sure that these
devastating kinds of 9-1-1 outages do not happen again.
Next story.
2

Shanika Parker had just finished working the night shift at her job outside of Indianapolis
this past summer. She was on her way home to Merryville when exhaustion got the better of her.
She dozed off behind the wheel. The next thing Ms. Parker knew, her car was upside down—
and quickly filling with water.
Ms. Parker acted fast. She called 9-1-1 from her cell phone. But when the operator
asked her where she was, Ms. Parker could answer only: “I don’t know. I don’t know. Can you
please help me?”
Using location information from her cell phone, local police were able to trace the call.
Using their knowledge of the area, the responding officers were able to figure out that her car
slid into a pond next to an interstate on her way home. When the officers arrived on the scene,
they found the overturned car. Mud was oozing through the windows and doors. Time was
rapidly running out.
Fortunately, this story ends well. But by the time the police pulled Ms. Parker out from
the car she had only eight inches of air left.
Ms. Parker issued a public statement thanking the police. But the police could not have
found her without location information from her cell phone. The officers said that the area was
so remote that if they had not located her when they did, Ms. Parker would not have been found
for days. This is what first responders can do—what you can do—when you have the right tools.
Because the dispatchers were able to use cellphone location information, Ms. Parker
survived. The fact that the call was made outdoors was absolutely critical.
You know that. But most consumers do not. Most consumers would probably expect
that first responders could find them wherever they went. That includes inside buildings. After
all, many of us are now used to checking maps on our smartphones and seeing that little blue dot
trailing us around, capturing our precise location and sometimes even offering us services based
on our location. If companies on the web can find us wherever we go, shouldn’t first responders
be able to as well?
That would make sense. But right now that is not the case. So what happens when the
cellphone call to 9-1-1 is made indoors?
Next story.
Mary Thomas suffered a stroke in New York this past June. Ms. Thomas knew
something was wrong. She mustered up the strength to call 9-1-1. But the stroke had taken its
toll. Her speech was slurred. She was unable to clearly tell the dispatcher—an Emergency
Medical Technician named Joann Hilman-Payne—where she was.
3

So the first responders turned to technology. The tower information for Ms. Thomas’s
phone gave an address for the call. But the address was wrong. It turns out that on the Upper
East Side of Manhattan, it can be easy to get lost. Lots of buildings, lots of floors, lots of
apartments stacked high in the sky. In fact, first responders in New York followed several false
leads trying to track the call. All in all, they searched for eight hours before they found Ms.
Thomas.
This is an incredible story. Because thanks to the superhuman efforts of the EMT who
stayed on the line—for a full straight eight hours—Ms. Thomas never lost consciousness and
was taken to a hospital to recover. Wow.
The next story is the last story. It’s my story.
As you know, as I’ve traveled across the country I have visited public safety call centers.
So I have seen so many of you at work in so many interesting places.
But my trip to the police department and 9-1-1 call center in Anchorage, Alaska was
among the most memorable. First of all, it’s Alaska. The summers are glorious, the salmon is
legendary, and the occasional Bull Moose walks down the street. The police department sits at
the foothills of the Chugach Mountains. The view is incredible. But I turned away from the hills
and I watched the call center at work—the dim lights, the digital maps, the steady ring of phones,
and the authoritative tone of those answering them. Then, standing inside, at the suggestion of
one of the officers, I used my wireless phone to call 9-1-1. My call came in. My call was
answered by someone less than two feet from my phone. But the system reported I was down
the road, around the corner, and for good measure—across the street. Not comforting.
If you take one thing from these stories from Indiana and New York and Alaska, it is that
location accuracy matters. First responders need to know where you are when you make that
critical call to 9-1-1.
So here is what usually happens:
If you call 9-1-1 from a wireline phone, your phone number and your location are
automatically reported.
If you call 9-1-1 from a wireless phone outdoors, your phone number and your location
are reported—sometimes to within 50 meters, under FCC location standards.
But if you call 9-1-1 from a wireless phone indoors, cross your fingers—because FCC
location standards do not apply.
This absence of policies governing indoor calls to 9-1-1 from wireless phones is an
unacceptable gap in our public safety communications. And it’s time to do something about it.
4

The numbers make this clear. Today, over 70 percent of calls to 9-1-1 are made from
wireless phones. That is over 400,000 calls per day. But more than that, a growing number of
those calls are made indoors. Wireless services are increasingly a substitute for traditional
wireline services. In fact, for more than one in three households their only phone is a wireless
phone. And that number is only going to grow.
So I think it is no longer acceptable for FCC policies governing location accuracy to
disregard the way we reach out for help. More of us reach out for help using wireless phones
than ever before. We love our wireless phones. Having them in our pockets, our purses, and on
our persons makes us safer wherever we go. But when the unthinkable occurs and you call 9-1-1
on your wireless phone, no matter where you are—indoors or out—you want first responders to
find you.
To be clear, the FCC has already done some work on this front. We have established
working groups as part of the Communications, Security, Reliability and Interoperability
Council—CSRIC—to examine and make recommendations on indoor location accuracy
standards. We supported testing location technology in real-world environments. We held a
workshop just last month on indoor location accuracy. And as we speak, a CSRIC working
group back in Washington is delivering a report on setting up a permanent test bed for indoor
location technology.
But I think the time has come to formalize our efforts and make more progress. I think it
is time for a rulemaking at the FCC to tackle this indoor location accuracy issue head on.
Technologies to extend the reach of our location data have been tested. FCC action can explore
whether other technologies, such as Wi-Fi hotspots, can be used to complement existing
technologies. And FCC action can encourage development of new technologies and new
standards. But most of all, FCC action can help make sure that no one is left waiting for help
indoors because first responders can’t find them.
Let me end here.
I want you to know that we are making progress. We have studied what happened to 9-1-
1 during the Derecho. And very soon we will turn what we have learned into policies that will
strengthen the reliability of 9-1-1 and the continuity of our communications networks. That is
good stuff.
But there is still more work to do. So I hope you will work with me and my colleagues at
the FCC and wireless carriers and public safety officials and stakeholders of all stripes to make
sure that the wireless phones we rely on can help make us even more safe and secure—even
when we call 9-1-1 from indoors.
Thank you—and thank you for the important work you do every day.
5

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.