Competing Applications Dismissed
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500445 12th St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Released: April 4, 2013
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU DISMISSES COMPETING APPLICATIONS
WT Docket No. 10-112By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) dismisses mutually
exclusive (i.e., competing) applications filed against 2.3 GHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)
authorizations held by AT&T Inc. (AT&T) and Stratos Offshore Services Company (Stratos),
BackgroundIn 2007, the Competing Applicants filed applications against most WCS applications for license
renewal.2 In May 2010, the Commission commenced a rulemaking to adopt consistent requirements for
the renewal of Wireless Radio Services licenses, including the 2.3 GHz WCS band.3 The Commission
reviewed the dispute between the WCS licensees and the Competing Applicants,4 and directed the Bureau
to grant the renewal applications, on a conditional basis, subject to the outcome of the rulemaking.5 The
Commission stated that if it were to adopt the rules and policies proposed in the rulemaking, it would
dismiss the Competing Applications.6 The rulemaking is pending.
1 See Request to Withdraw Pleadings, Petitions & Filings, filed by Green Flag Wireless, LLC (Green Flag), CWC
License Holding, Inc. (CWC), Corr Investments I, LLC (Corr, the successor-in-interest to CWC), James McCotter
(McCotter) and AT&T, WT Docket 10-112 (filed Jan. 3, 2013) (AT&T First Dismissal Request); Request to
Withdraw Pleadings, Petitions & Filings, filed by Green Flag, CWC, Corr, McCotter, Snapline Communications,
LLC (Snapline) and AT&T, WT Docket 10-112 (filed Jan. 30, 2013) (AT&T Second Dismissal Request). We
collectively refer to Corr, CWC, Green Flag, McCotter, and Snapline as the Competing Applicants. See also
Request for Dismissal of Applications and Petitions and Approval of Agreement filed by Green Flag and Stratos,
WT Docket 10-112 (filed Sept. 24, 2012) (Stratos Dismissal Request).
2 ULS File Nos. 0003113283 et al.
3 Amendment of Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 90, 95, and 101 To Establish Uniform License Renewal, Discontinuance
of Operation, and Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation Rules and Policies for Certain Wireless
Radio Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 25 FCC Rcd 6996 (2010).
4 Id. at 7035-38 ¶¶106-111.
5 Id. at 7039 ¶113.
6 Id. at 7033-34 ¶100.
On August 28, 2012, the Bureau found that a temporary waiver of Section 1.935 of the
Commission’s rules, which limits the consideration that parties may exchange to resolve mutually
exclusive applications, would serve the public interest by helping resolve the Competing Applications.7
On October 15, 2012, the Bureau approved a Settlement Agreement to resolve the Competing
Applications.8 The Bureau found that approval of the agreement would serve the public interest by
helping eliminate uncertainty regarding the WCS band, thereby removing an impediment to the
significant investment needed to deploy next-generation services in the band.9 The Bureau dismissed all
Competing Applications and related filings regarding AT&T’s WCS authorizations.
The Bureau also determined that its approval of the Settlement Agreement would extend to
resolution of any Competing Applications that were filed in 2007 against WCS authorizations that AT&T
may subsequently acquire.10 At that time, AT&T had requested consent to acquire WCS authorizations
from: (1) wholly-owned subsidiaries of Comcast Corporation (Comcast); (2) Horizon Wi-Com, LLC
(Horizon); (3) subsidiaries of NextWave Wireless, Inc. (Nextwave), and (4) San Diego Gas & Electric
Company (SDG&E).11 On December 18, 2012, the Commission consented to AT&T’s acquisition of
those authorizations.12 AT&T has since consummated acquisition of the authorizations.
Review and Approval of the AT&T Dismissal RequestsWe review the AT&T Dismissal Requests under Section 1.935 of the Commission’s rules.
Section 1.935 requires parties that enter into an agreement to resolve mutually exclusive applications by
withdrawing or seeking dismissal of one or more applications to first obtain Commission approval.
Section 1.935 requires moving parties to submit a copy of any related written agreement (here, the
Settlement Agreement, which the Bureau approved previously), and any related request for approval of
the withdrawal or dismissal (here, the AT&T Dismissal Requests).
As required by the Bureau’s WCS Settlement Public Notice, AT&T and the Competing
Applicants: (1) state that they have not materially amended, or waived, any substantive provision of the
Settlement Agreement; (2) have enumerated each Competing Application to be dismissed; and (3) have
7 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Grants Limited Waiver To Facilitate Resolution of Competing Renewal
Applications, Public Notice, DA 12-1407, 27 FCC Rcd 10248 (WTB 2012) (WCS Settlement Public Notice).
8 The Settlement Agreement is by and among the Competing Applicants and BellSouth Mobile Data, Inc., New
Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, and SBC Telecom, Inc. (together with AT&T Inc., AT&T). The Settlement
Agreement is attached to the Joint Ex Parte Request for Resolution of Competing Applications, WT Docket 10-112
(filed Aug. 31, 2012).
11 See AT&T Seeks FCC Consent to the Assignment and Transfer of Control of WCS and AWS-1 Licenses, WT
Docket No. 12-240, Public Notice, DA 12-1431, 27 FCC Rcd 10329 (WTB 2012); AT&T Mobility Spectrum LLC
and San Diego Gas & Electric Company Seek FCC Consent to the Assignment of Two WCS Licenses, WT Docket
No. 12-240, Public Notice, DA 12-1513, 27 FCC Rcd 11159 (WTB 2012).
12 See Applications of AT&T Mobility Spectrum LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, Comcast Corporation,
Horizon Wi-Com, LLC, NextWave Wireless, Inc., and San Diego Gas & Electric Company for Consent to Assign
and Transfer Licenses, WT Docket No. 12-240, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 12-156, 27 FCC Rcd
16459 (rel. Dec. 18, 2012).
confirmed that they will not exchange any financial consideration for dismissal of the Competing
Applications until the Bureau dismisses such applications and related filings with prejudice.13 We have
reviewed the Dismissal Requests and find that our approval will serve the public interest by removing
uncertainty regarding the WCS Band, and thereby promote intensive use of the spectrum. Accordingly,
we hereby grant the AT&T Dismissal Requests and dismiss, with prejudice and effective immediately, the
Competing Applications and related filings.
Review and Approval of the Stratos Dismissal RequestGreen Flag and Stratos have entered into an agreement for dismissal of Green Flag’s Competing
Applications against four Stratos WCS authorizations.14 We have reviewed the terms of the parties’
agreement and the Stratos Dismissal Request under Section 1.925 of the Commission’s rules,15 and find
that our approval will serve the public interest by removing uncertainty regarding the Stratos WCS
authorizations. Accordingly, we hereby approve the parties’ agreement, grant the Stratos Dismissal
Request, and dismiss, with prejudice and effective immediately, the Green Flag Competing Applications
and related filings.
For further information, please contact Richard Arsenault, Chief Counsel, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0920 or Richard.Arsenault@fcc.gov.
Action by the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, taken pursuant to
Sections 1, 308, and 309 of the Communications Act, and Sections 0.331, 1.3, and 1.935 of the
13 See AT&T First Dismissal Request and AT&T Second Dismissal Request.
14 Stratos Dismissal Request at 2.
15 As explained above, the Bureau previously granted a temporary waiver of the Commission’s rule limiting the
consideration that parties may exchange to resolve the Competing Applications; we therefore do not review
16 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 308, and 309; 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.331, 1.3, and 1.935.
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.