Cramming FNPRM Reply Comment Deadline Extended
Federal Communications Commission
DA 12-1039
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of)
)
Empowering Consumers to Prevent and Detect
)
CG Docket No. 11-116
Billing for Unauthorized Charges (“Cramming”)
)
)
Consumer Information and Disclosure
)
CG Docket No. 09-158
)
Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format
)
CC Docket No. 98-170
ORDER
Adopted: June 29, 2012
Released: June 29, 2012
Revised Reply Comment Date: July 20, 2012
By the Acting Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau:1. On April 27, 2012, the Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
proposing additional rules to help consumers prevent and detect the placement of unauthorized charges on
their telephone bills, an unlawful and fraudulent practice commonly referred to as “cramming.”1 The
Cramming FNPRM sets deadlines for filing comments and reply comments at 30 and 45 days after its
publication in the Federal Register,2 which occurred on May 24, 2012.3 Accordingly, the deadline for
filing comments was set at June 25, 2012, and the deadline for filing reply comments was set at July 9,
2012.4
2. On June 26, 2012, the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA)
submitted a Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments seeking a 30-day extension of the reply
comment deadline for all interested parties.5 In support of its Motion, NASUCA states that such an
extension is warranted because it will enable its members to review the large number of initial comments
that were filed and to perform the coordination necessary for NASUCA to formulate thoughtful reply
comments. NASUCA states that the current reply period includes the Fourth of July holiday and its
midyear meeting being held June 25-26, 2012, and that this scheduling will make it more difficult for it to
1 Empowering Consumers to Prevent and Detect Billing for Unauthorized Charges (“Cramming”); Consumer
Information and Disclosure; Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, CG Docket Nos. 11-116 and 09-158, CC Docket
98-170, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 12-42 (rel. Apr. 27, 2012) (Cramming
FNPRM); Erratum (rel. June 7, 2012).
2 Id.
3 See 77 Fed. Reg. 30972 (May 24, 2012).
4 See Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau Announces Comment Deadlines for “Cramming” Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, CG Docket Nos. 11-116 and 09-158, CC Docket 98-170, Public Notice, DA 12-833 (rel.
May 25, 2012).
5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments, CG Docket Nos. 11-116 and 09-158, CC Docket 98-170
(filed June 26, 2012) (Motion) at 2-3.
Federal Communications Commission
DA 12-1039
complete reply comments by the current July 9, 2012 deadline.6 At least one party has filed in support ofNASUCA’s request.7
3. It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time are not routinely granted.8 Such
extensions may, however, be warranted when, among other things, the additional time will serve the
public interest.9 In the instant proceeding, we find for the reasons stated in NASUCA’s motion that
providing additional time for all interested parties to file reply comments is reasonable and would be
beneficial to the development of a complete record on the issues. We believe, however, that an extension
of 11 days, rather than the requested 30 days, should provide adequate time for all parties to submit reply
comments. Under these circumstances, we conclude that granting an 11-day extension of time to file
reply comments serves the public interest and thus extend the reply comment deadline to
Friday, July 20,
2012
4. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED
, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Actof 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), (j), and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46 of the Commission’s
Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.141, 0.361, 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments filed
by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
IS GRANTED
to the extent indicatedherein and
IS OTHERWISE DENIED,
and the deadline for filing reply comments in response to theCramming FNPRM
IS EXTENDED
to July 20, 2012.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kris Anne Monteith
Acting Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
6 Id. at 2.
7 See Consumers Union’s Comment in Support of NASUCA’s Motion for Extension of Time, CG Docket Nos. 11-
116 and 09-158, CC Docket 98-170 (filed June 28, 2012).
8 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a).
9 See, e.g., Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHZ Band, Service Rules for Advanced
Wireless Services in the 1915-1920 MHZ, 1995-2000 MHZ, 2020-2025 MHZ and 2175-2180 MHZ Bands, WT
Docket Nos. 04-356, 07-195, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10527, 10528, para. 4 (WTB 2008); Review of the Emergency
Alert System, EB Docket No. 04-296, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 1849 (PSHSB 2010).
2
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.





