Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

FCC Releases Telephone Subscribership Report.

Download Options

Released: December 14, 2011



TELEPHONE SUBSCRIBERSHIP IN THE UNITED STATES


(Data through July 2011)














Industry Analysis and Technology Division
Wireline Competition Bureau
Federal Communications Commission

Released: December 2011












This report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street,
SW, Washington, DC. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW,
Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378-3160, or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. The
report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at
http://transition.fcc.gov/wcb/stats.


Telephone Subscribership in the United States


(Data through July 2010)

Executive Summary


This is the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) report on telephone subscribership in the
United States, based on the Current Population Survey (CPS) conducted by the Census Bureau.1 Updated
subscribership statistics for the November 2010, March 2011, and July 2011 CPS data releases are
included in this report.2 Based on the most recent July 2011 data, we estimate that 95.6% of all
households in the United States had telephone service. In addition, the report presents subscribership
estimates by state, income levels, race,3 age, household size, and employment status.

Statistical Findings


In July 2011:


The telephone subscribership penetration rate in the U.S. was 95.6%, a decrease of 0.4% over the rate
from July 2010. This decrease is not considered statistically significant.

The telephone penetration rate for households in income categories below $20,000 was at or below
94.7%, while the rate for households in income categories over $75,000 was at least 98.9%.

Among the states, the penetration rates ranged from a low of 91.4% to a high of 98.5%.

Penetration rates ranged from 93.8% for households headed by a person under 25 to at least 95.9%
for households headed by a person over 55.

Households with one person had a penetration rate of 93.5%, compared to a rate of 96.5% for
households with four or five persons.

The penetration rate for unemployed adults was 95.1%, while the rate for employed adults was
96.7%.

Background


Continuing analysis of telephone penetration statistics allows one to examine the aggregate
effects of Commission actions and industry evolution on households' decisions to maintain, acquire, or
drop telephone service. This report presents comprehensive data on telephone penetration statistics
collected by the Bureau of the Census under contract with the FCC. Along with telephone penetration
statistics for the United States and each of the states, data are provided on penetration for various
demographic characteristics.


1 Downloadable CPS data is freely available from the Census Bureau at www.cps.gov/cps. All statistics provided in
this report are derived from such raw data.

2 The most recent previous report is Telephone Subscribership in the United States (May 19, 2011), Industry
Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission. Please
refer to that and prior reports for data releases earlier than November 2010.

3 The racial categories reported in the CPS are white, black, and other. The “other” category (which includes
Asians, Native Americans, and anyone else who doesn’t consider themselves white or black) is not included in the
tables and charts in this report because the sample size is too small. The ethnic category Hispanic, however, is
included. Hispanics can be of any race for purposes of the categories reported in the CPS.

U.S. Federal Communications Commission

Telephone Subscribership Report 1


(Data as of November, 2010)


The most widely used measure of telephone subscribership is the percentage of households with
telephone service, sometimes called a measure of telephone penetration. Prior to the 1980s, precise
measurements of telephone subscribership received little attention. Traditionally, telephone penetration
was measured by dividing the number of residential telephone lines by the number of households.
Measures of penetration based on the number of residential lines, however, became less reliable as more
and more households added second telephone lines and more consumers acquired second homes. By
1980, the traditional measure of penetration (residential lines divided by the number of households)
reached 96%,4 while the proportion of households reporting that they had telephones in the 1980 census
was only 92.9%.


Recognizing the need for more precise, periodic measurement of subscribership, the Commission
requested that the Census Bureau include questions on telephone availability as part of its CPS, which
monitors demographic trends between decennial censuses. The CPS is a staggered panel survey in which
the people residing at particular addresses are included in the survey for four consecutive months in one
year and the same four months in the following year. Use of the CPS has several advantages: it is
conducted every month by an independent and expert agency, the sample is large, and the questions are
consistent. Thus, changes in the results can be compared over time with a reasonable degree of
confidence.5


The specific questions regarding telephone asked in the CPS are: "Does this house, apartment, or
mobile home have telephone service from which you can both make and receive calls? Please include
cell phones, regular phones, and any other type of telephone."6 And, if the answer to the first question is
"no," this is followed up with, "Is there a telephone elsewhere on which people in this household can be
called?" If the answer to the first question is "yes," the household is counted as having a telephone "in
unit." If the answer to either the first or second question is "yes," the household is counted as having a
telephone "available." The “in unit” data are reported in all of the tables and figures in this report. The
“available” data are reported alongside the “in unit” data for Tables 3 through 12 and Figure 1.


4 See Table 6, Statistics of Communications Common Carriers (Federal Communications Commission, Year Ended
December 31, 1980).

5 Unfortunately, penetration statistics derived from the CPS cannot be directly compared with the penetration
estimates based on the responses to the long forms of the 1980, 1990, and 2000 decennial censuses or the American
Community Survey (ACS). This is due to differences in sampling techniques and survey methodologies as well as
differences in the context in which the questions are asked. For example, the 2010 ACS reported 97.5% of all
occupied housing units in the United States had telephone service available, whereas the March 2010 CPS data
showed a household penetration rate of 96.0%. This difference is statistically significant and may indicate that the
CPS value is on the low side and the ACS value is on the high side, with the most probable value lying somewhere
in between.

6 The questions are intended to be neutral as to whether the household has wireline or wireless phones. Through
November 2004, this question had been worded: "Is there a telephone in this house/apartment?" Because of the
increasing number of households that have wireless only, there was some concern that some of these households
may not think of their mobile phones when asked if they have a telephone. Consequently, beginning in December
2004, CPS changed its telephone question to the wording given above. The values since March 2005 reflect the
new question. While we note there was an apparent drop in the penetration rate between November 2004 and
March 2005, at least some of this drop may be attributable to households that responded to the previous form of the
question by reporting the presence of a telephone which was no longer in service.

U.S. Federal Communications Commission

Telephone Subscribership Report 2


(Data through July 2011)


Although the survey is conducted every month, not all questions are asked every month. The
telephone questions are asked once every four months, in the month that a household is first included in
the sample and in the month that the household re-enters the sample a year later. Since the sample is
staggered, the reported information for any given month actually reflects responses over the preceding
four months. Aggregated summaries of the responses are reported to the Commission, based on the
surveys conducted through March, July, and November of each year. Thus, this report includes data for
CPS survey periods ending in March 2011 and July 2011.


The CPS data are based on a nationwide sample of about fifty to sixty thousand households in the
50 states and the District of Columbia. The CPS does not cover outlying areas that are not states, such as
Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.7 Because a
sample is used, the estimates are subject to sampling error. For the nationwide totals, changes in
telephone penetration between consecutive reports of less than or equal to 0.7% may be due to sampling
error and cannot be regarded as statistically significant. As explained below, when comparing national
penetration rates for the same month in two consecutive years, changes of less than 0.6% are not
statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. When comparing annual, national averages, changes
of less than or equal to 0.4% are not statistically significant. The annual averages are the average of the
three surveys of the year in question. For individual states or other subgroups of the U.S. population, the
amount of sampling variability is much greater, because the sample sizes are smaller. This will require
larger changes to yield statistical significance at the same confidence level.


The data in this report are not seasonally adjusted. Because there is roughly a fifty percent
overlap in the sample with the sample for the same month in the previous year, there is a high correlation
between values a year apart. However, after accounting for this, there has been no significant systematic
seasonal variation.

Results and Statistical Analysis



Census Bureau figures for July 2011, the most recent data available, show that the percentage of
households subscribing to telephone service was 95.6%. This 0.4% decrease from 96.0% as of July 2010
is not statistically significant.8


This report includes figures showing subscribership percentages by state, by the head of the
household's age and race, by household size, by income, and by labor force status for adults. The July
2011 data show that 96.2% of adult individuals in the civilian non-institutionalized population (CNP)
have a telephone in their household. This decrease of 0.2% from the 96.4% of July 2010 is not
statistically significant.


This report contains twelve tables and seven figures presenting penetration statistics for various
geographic and demographic characteristics. Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 1 provide an overview of the
main subscribership estimates. Tables 3 through 7 present more detailed information since March 2008.
Data from November 1983 through November 2007 are available in previous Subscribership Reports or

7 Annual data for Puerto Rico have been available from the American Community Survey (ACS) starting with 2005.
The latest available value for Puerto Rico from that survey is 93.5% for 2010, compared to a national average (for
the 50 states and the District of Columbia) of 97.5% using the ACS.

8 As explained elsewhere in the report, changes from year to year for the same month are more reliable than changes
between consecutive reporting periods.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission

Telephone Subscribership Report 3


(Data through July 2011)

Monitoring Reports in CC Docket Nos. 87-339 or 98-202.9 In Tables 3 through 7, the column headed
"Unit" indicates the percentage of households for which there is telephone service in the housing unit.
The column headed "Avail" indicates the percentage of households which have telephone service
available for incoming and outgoing calls, either in the housing unit or elsewhere (such as at work or at a
neighbor’s home). Tables 8 through 12 provide information necessary to determine the statistical
significance of changes in the penetration rates over time.


Table 1 summarizes the telephone penetration for the United States, as well as the total numbers
of households estimated to have or lack telephone service.


Figure 1 graphically depicts the nationwide penetration rates for households over time, up
through July 2011.


Table 2 summarizes the telephone penetration rates by state, showing the rates for November
1983 and July 2011, the change between those sample periods, and an indication as to whether the change
is statistically significant using a simple test for differences in means and a 95% significance level. The
statistical significance of a change is determined not only by the magnitude of that change, but also by the
sizes of the samples used to estimate the change.


Figure 2 depicts the states with July 2011 penetration rates (as shown in Table 2) more than 1%
below the national average, within 1% of the national average, or more than 1% above the national
average.


Figure 3 depicts changes in household penetration rates by state (as shown in Table 2) between
November 1983 and July 2011. States with statistically significant increases (there are no significant
decreases) are shown, along with other states with increases or decreases.


Figure 4 depicts the relationship between telephone penetration and household income, using July
2011 penetration rates for all households and for households headed by white, black, and Hispanic
persons. It is based on data in Table 4.


Figure 5 depicts the relationship between telephone penetration and household size, using July
2011 penetration rates for all households and for households headed by white, black, and Hispanic
persons. It is based on data in Table 5.


Figure 6 depicts the relationship between telephone penetration and the head of the household's
age, using July 2010 penetration rates for all households and for households headed by white, black, and
Hispanic persons. It is based on data in Table 6.


Figure 7 depicts the relationship between telephone penetration and labor force status for civilian
non-institutionalized adults, using July 2011 penetration rates for all adults and for white, black, and
Hispanic adults. It is based on data in Table 7.


Table 3 provides penetration estimates by state for each CPS sample from March 2008 to July
2011. Table 4 shows the nationwide penetration rates for households by income and the race of the head
of the household. Caution should be used in comparing these figures over time, because these income
levels are not adjusted for inflation. Thus, the same nominal income level at two points in time will
reflect different real incomes in terms of purchasing power

9
Documents are currently available at http://transition.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/lec.html.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission

Telephone Subscribership Report 4


(Data through July 2011)



Table 5 shows the nationwide penetration rates for households by the size of the household and
the race of the head of the household. It shows that penetration is higher for households of 2 to 5 people
than it is for single-person households or those with 6 or more people.


Table 6 shows the nationwide penetration rates for households by the age and race of the head of
the household. It shows that the penetration rate tends to be lower for young and non-white households.


Table 7 shows the nationwide penetration rates for all persons that are at least 15 years old in the
civilian non-institutionalized population by their race and employment status. Since this table is for
individual adults rather than households, the total penetration rates are different from those in the
previous tables. It shows that penetration is lowest among the unemployed.


Tables 8 through 12 present the critical values at the 95% confidence level for testing the
statistical significance of changes in penetration rates over time in the earlier tables.10 These critical
values are relevant because changes less than or equal to the values shown are likely to be due to
sampling error and thus cannot be regarded as demonstrating that a change in telephone penetration has
occurred. In some cases, these critical values are very large because the sample sizes are very small for
these subcategories, rendering the changes in estimated penetration rates unreliable. Because there is an
overlap of half of the sample from year to year, but no overlap in the sample between surveys that are
four months apart, annual changes are less subject to variations in sampling error. Consequently, the
critical values should be multiplied by 0.768 when making a comparison for the same month in two
consecutive years. When comparing the annual averages, the critical values should be multiplied by 0.55,
since these averages are based on three surveys and hence have a lower standard error. When comparing
annual averages of two consecutive years, the critical values should be multiplied by .42, taking into
account both of the above factors.

At the end of 2007, the Census Bureau revised their variability estimates upward, to reflect the increased
variability in the penetration rates in recent years.

10 At the end of 2007, the Census Bureau revised their variability estimates upward, to reflect the increased
variability in the penetration rates in recent years.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission

Telephone Subscribership Report 5


(Data through July 2011)

Table 1

Household Telephone Subscribership in the United States

Households
Percentage
Households
Percentage
with
with
without
without
Date
Households
Telephones
Telephones
Telephones
Telephones
(millions)
(millions)
(millions)
November
1983
85.8
78.4
91.4%
7.4
8.6%
November
1984
87.4
79.9
91.4%
7.5
8.6%
November
1985
88.8
81.6
91.9%
7.2
8.1%
November
1986
89.9
83.1
92.4%
6.8
7.6%
November
1987
91.3
84.3
92.3%
7.0
7.7%
November
1988
92.6
85.7
92.5%
6.9
7.5%
November
1989
93.9
87.3
93.0%
6.6
7.0%
November
1990
94.7
88.4
93.3%
6.3
6.7%
November
1991
95.7
89.4
93.4%
6.3
6.6%
November
1992
97.0
91.0
93.8%
6.0
6.2%
November
1993
98.8
93.0
94.2%
5.8
5.8%
November
1994
99.8
93.7
93.8%
6.2
6.2%
November
1995
100.4
94.2
93.9%
6.2
6.1%
November
1996
101.3
95.1
93.9%
6.2
6.1%
November
1997
102.8
96.5
93.8%
6.3
6.2%
November
1998
104.1
98.0
94.2%
6.1
5.8%
November
1999
105.4
99.1
94.1%
6.3
5.9%
November
2000
106.5
100.2
94.1%
6.3
5.9%
November
2001
107.7
102.2
94.9%
5.5
5.1%
November
2002
109.0
104.0
95.3%
5.1
4.7%
November
2003
113.1
107.1
94.7%
6.0
5.3%
November
2004
113.8
106.4
93.5%
7.4
6.5%
November
2005
115.2
107.0
92.9%
8.2
7.1%
March
2006
115.5
107.2
92.8%
8.4
7.2%
July
2006
116.2
109.9
94.6%
6.3
5.4%
November
2006
116.4
108.8
93.4%
7.6
6.6%
March
2007
117.1
110.8
94.6%
6.4
5.4%
July
2007
117.7
111.7
95.0%
5.9
5.0%
November
2007
118.2
112.2
94.9%
6.0
5.1%
March
2008
117.8
112.2
95.2%
5.6
4.8%
July
2008
118.0
112.6
95.4%
5.5
4.6%
November
2008
118.6
112.7
95.0%
5.9
5.0%
March
2009
118.4
113.2
95.6%
5.2
4.4%
July
2009
118.4
113.3
95.7%
5.1
4.3%
November
2009
119.2
114.0
95.7%
5.1
4.3%
March
2010
118.3
113.6
96.0%
4.7
4.0%
July
2010
118.3
113.5
96.0%
4.8
4.0%
November
2010
119.4
114.0
95.5%
5.4
4.5%
March
2011
119.8
114.9
95.9%
4.9
4.1%
July
2011
119.3
114.1
95.6%
5.2
4.4%
Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding.
6

Figure 1: Telephone Penetration
Households
100
97
94
e
phone
Tel
i
t
h
w
91
e
rcent
P
88
85
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
N8
N8
N8
N8
N8
N8
N8
N9
N9
N9
N9
N9
N9
N9
N9
N9
N9
N0
N0
N0
N0
N0
N0
N0
N0
N0
N0
N1
Month (March, July, November)
In Unit
Available
7

Table 2: Telephone Penetration by State

(Percentage of Households with Telephone Service in Unit)

NOVEMBER 1983

JULY 2011

CHANGE

UNITED STATES

91.4 %
95.6 %
4.2 %
*

ALABAMA

87.9
96.5
8.6
*

ALASKA

83.8
95.6
11.9
*

ARIZONA

88.8
93.9
5.1

ARKANSAS

88.2
93.8
5.7
*

CALIFORNIA

91.7
95.8
4.0
*

COLORADO

94.4
97.9
3.5

CONNECTICUT

95.5
98.5
3.0

DELAWARE

95.0
97.0
1.9

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

94.7
93.0
-1.8

FLORIDA

85.5
92.7
7.2
*

GEORGIA

88.9
93.8
4.9

HAWAII

94.6
94.9
0.3

IDAHO

89.5
96.0
6.6
*

ILLINOIS

95.0
94.7
-0.3

INDIANA

90.3
91.9
1.6

IOWA

95.4
97.9
2.6

KANSAS

94.9
97.7
2.8

KENTUCKY

86.9
94.9
7.9
*

LOUISIANA

88.9
98.0
9.0
*

MAINE

90.7
97.7
7.0
*

MARYLAND

96.3
95.1
-1.2

MASSACHUSETTS

94.3
97.0
2.7

MICHIGAN

93.8
96.9
3.1

MINNESOTA

96.4
97.9
1.6

MISSISSIPPI

82.4
96.8
14.4
*

MISSOURI

92.1
96.2
4.2

MONTANA

92.8
95.0
2.3

NEBRASKA

94.0
97.6
3.6

NEVADA

89.4
97.9
8.5
*

NEW HAMPSHIRE

95.0
98.3
3.3

NEW JERSEY

94.1
96.6
2.5

NEW MEXICO

85.3
92.0
6.7

NEW YORK

90.8
94.6
3.7
*

NORTH CAROLINA

89.3
95.4
6.1
*

NORTH DAKOTA

95.1
98.5
3.4

OHIO

92.2
96.7
4.5
*

OKLAHOMA

91.5
95.1
3.6

OREGON

91.2
97.7
6.5
*

PENNSYLVANIA

95.1
97.5
2.4

RHODE ISLAND

93.3
97.6
4.3

SOUTH CAROLINA

81.8
95.6
13.8
*

SOUTH DAKOTA

92.7
97.8
5.1
*

TENNESSEE

87.6
91.4
3.8

TEXAS

89.0
95.8
6.9
*

UTAH

90.3
95.8
5.5
*

VERMONT

92.7
98.1
5.4
*

VIRGINIA

93.1
95.2
2.1

WASHINGTON

92.5
98.4
6.0
*

WEST VIRGINIA

88.1
94.7
6.6
*

WISCONSIN

94.8
96.3
1.5

WYOMING

89.7
98.2
8.5
*
* Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level.
Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding.
8

Figure 2

Telephone Penetration as of July 2011

Penetration Rate

x < 94.6
94.6 <= x < 96.6
96.6 < x
Source: Census, Current
Population Survey, July
2011.

Figure 3

Penetration Changes November 1983 - July 2011

Change

Decrease
Increase
Significant Increase
Source: Census, Current
Population Survey, July
2011.

Figure 4: Telephone Penetration by Income Level

July 2011

100
95
90
85
80
75
70
Percent of Households
65
60
55
50
UNDER
$5,000 -
$7,500 -
$10,000 -
$12,500 -
$15,000 -
$20,000 -
$25,000 -
$30,000 -
$35,000 -
$40,000 -
$50,000 -
$60,000 -
$75,000 -
$100,000 - $150,000 +
$5,000
$7,499
$9,999
$12,499
$14,999
$19,999
$24,999
$29,999
$34,999
$39,999
$49,999
$59,999
$74,999
$99,999
$149,999
Income
Total
White
Black
Hispanic
11

Figure 5: Telephone Penetration by Household Size: July 2011

100
95
90
85
80
ouseholds
75
70
65
60
Percent of H
55
50
1
2 - 3
4 - 5
6+
Persons in Household

Figure 6: Telephone Penetration by Householder's Age: July 2011

100
95
90
85
80
ouseholds
75
70
65
Percent of H
60
55
50
15-24
25-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-99
Householder's Age

Figure 7: Telephone Penetration by Labor Force Status: July 2011

100
95
90
85
dults
80
75
70
65
Percent of A
60
55
50
Total CNP
Employed
Unemployed
Not in Labor Force
Total
White Labor Force Status
Black
Hispanic
12

Table 3

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by State

2008

ANNUAL

MARCH

JULY

NOVEMBER

AVERAGE

Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

UNITED STATES

95.2
95.9
95.4
96.1
95.0
95.7
95.2
95.9

ALABAMA

91.8
93.5
95.4
96.8
94.9
95.2
94.0
95.2

ALASKA

95.9
97.9
96.1
98.1
97.2
98.9
96.4
98.3

ARIZONA

93.7
94.1
94.6
95.5
95.4
96.6
94.6
95.4

ARKANSAS

92.5
92.9
93.6
93.9
92.4
93.1
92.9
93.3

CALIFORNIA

96.6
97.1
96.4
97.0
96.3
96.8
96.5
97.0

COLORADO

98.4
98.9
98.0
98.5
97.6
98.0
98.0
98.4

CONNECTICUT

97.4
97.6
96.9
97.1
97.1
97.5
97.1
97.4

DELAWARE

95.2
95.5
92.3
92.7
96.7
96.8
94.7
95.0

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

93.9
95.5
91.8
92.8
90.3
91.7
92.0
93.3

FLORIDA

93.8
94.3
93.1
94.1
92.1
92.9
93.0
93.8

GEORGIA

95.0
95.5
92.9
94.0
90.8
92.2
92.9
93.9

HAWAII

96.1
97.3
97.1
97.5
96.2
96.4
96.5
97.0

IDAHO

98.1
98.1
95.2
95.9
94.8
95.2
96.0
96.4

ILLINOIS

94.1
94.9
94.2
95.0
93.9
94.6
94.1
94.9

INDIANA

92.2
92.5
92.6
93.1
91.5
92.2
92.1
92.6

IOWA

97.1
97.4
98.1
98.3
97.1
97.5
97.4
97.7

KANSAS

96.5
96.7
96.7
97.3
95.9
96.6
96.4
96.9

KENTUCKY

92.4
93.2
94.7
95.6
95.1
95.9
94.1
94.9

LOUISIANA

96.7
97.5
95.9
96.6
94.5
95.6
95.7
96.6

MAINE

97.8
98.3
97.6
97.9
98.1
98.7
97.8
98.3

MARYLAND

94.7
95.5
93.3
93.8
96.0
96.7
94.7
95.3

MASSACHUSETTS

96.4
97.7
96.7
97.0
96.1
96.7
96.4
97.1

MICHIGAN

96.1
96.5
96.0
96.1
95.8
96.0
96.0
96.2

MINNESOTA

98.0
98.4
98.3
99.1
98.2
98.7
98.2
98.7

MISSISSIPPI

92.7
94.0
93.0
94.2
92.3
93.9
92.7
94.0

MISSOURI

96.5
97.0
97.0
97.4
97.0
97.8
96.8
97.4

MONTANA

95.1
95.3
94.9
96.1
93.4
94.0
94.5
95.1

NEBRASKA

95.3
96.6
95.6
97.2
93.3
95.8
94.7
96.5

NEVADA

93.8
94.4
95.8
97.0
92.5
92.8
94.0
94.7

NEW HAMPSHIRE

96.7
98.2
98.2
98.9
98.1
98.5
97.7
98.5

NEW JERSEY

94.3
94.6
94.6
94.8
95.4
95.8
94.8
95.1

NEW MEXICO

94.0
94.0
92.4
94.6
91.4
92.5
92.6
93.7

NEW YORK

94.2
95.1
94.3
95.3
94.7
95.5
94.4
95.3

NORTH CAROLINA

92.2
93.4
94.5
95.1
93.9
94.9
93.5
94.5

NORTH DAKOTA

97.7
97.9
98.8
99.3
98.5
99.0
98.3
98.7

OHIO

97.4
97.6
97.0
97.6
96.4
96.7
96.9
97.3

OKLAHOMA

95.1
96.0
95.1
95.9
95.6
96.2
95.3
96.0

OREGON

97.3
97.9
97.5
97.7
98.1
98.8
97.6
98.1

PENNSYLVANIA

97.7
98.1
97.6
98.5
98.3
98.7
97.9
98.4

RHODE ISLAND

95.9
96.4
97.3
98.0
96.0
96.5
96.4
97.0

SOUTH CAROLINA

91.0
92.3
90.1
91.0
91.4
93.0
90.8
92.1

SOUTH DAKOTA

96.1
97.4
97.8
98.1
96.4
96.8
96.8
97.5

TENNESSEE

93.0
93.2
93.1
93.7
92.9
94.2
93.0
93.7

TEXAS

93.6
95.2
95.4
96.1
93.9
94.7
94.3
95.3

UTAH

97.2
97.7
97.1
97.4
96.3
96.6
96.9
97.2

VERMONT

97.3
97.7
96.4
96.8
97.4
98.0
97.0
97.5

VIRGINIA

96.6
96.8
95.5
96.4
95.0
95.5
95.7
96.2

WASHINGTON

98.3
98.5
97.9
98.3
98.0
98.3
98.1
98.4

WEST VIRGINIA

93.8
94.4
94.2
95.3
95.4
96.2
94.5
95.3

WISCONSIN

97.0
97.3
97.7
98.1
96.8
97.5
97.2
97.6

WYOMING

95.6
97.3
95.4
96.7
96.4
96.7
95.8
96.9
13

Table 3

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by State

2009

ANNUAL

MARCH

JULY

NOVEMBER

AVERAGE

Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

UNITED STATES

95.6
96.3
95.7
96.3
95.7
96.3
95.7
96.3

ALABAMA

94.7
95.2
95.3
96.0
95.5
96.6
95.2
96.0

ALASKA

95.8
97.0
95.9
97.5
97.0
97.3
96.2
97.3

ARIZONA

93.0
93.9
93.5
94.4
94.7
95.2
93.7
94.5

ARKANSAS

93.5
94.1
92.8
93.6
92.8
93.4
93.0
93.7

CALIFORNIA

96.8
97.3
96.6
96.9
96.7
97.1
96.7
97.1

COLORADO

98.3
98.8
97.0
97.7
96.8
97.6
97.4
98.0

CONNECTICUT

97.6
97.8
98.5
98.9
97.0
97.7
97.7
98.1

DELAWARE

95.8
96.1
96.5
96.9
95.3
95.6
95.9
96.2

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

94.1
94.9
91.3
92.0
91.1
92.5
92.2
93.1

FLORIDA

92.6
93.1
92.9
93.7
93.4
93.9
93.0
93.6

GEORGIA

95.0
95.5
93.8
94.5
93.6
94.1
94.1
94.7

HAWAII

97.2
97.7
98.7
98.7
97.2
97.3
97.7
97.9

IDAHO

96.8
97.1
96.3
96.8
97.8
97.9
97.0
97.3

ILLINOIS

94.6
95.6
95.9
96.5
94.7
95.6
95.1
95.9

INDIANA

93.3
94.2
92.3
92.3
93.7
93.9
93.1
93.5

IOWA

98.4
98.8
98.3
98.6
97.7
98.7
98.1
98.7

KANSAS

96.5
97.5
97.1
97.5
96.9
97.1
96.8
97.3

KENTUCKY

93.4
94.0
94.8
95.0
92.8
93.9
93.7
94.3

LOUISIANA

95.5
96.1
94.9
95.7
97.2
98.2
95.9
96.7

MAINE

97.9
98.5
97.1
97.9
97.9
98.2
97.6
98.2

MARYLAND

95.5
96.1
95.0
95.5
95.6
96.3
95.4
96.0

MASSACHUSETTS

97.9
98.4
98.2
98.6
98.4
98.8
98.2
98.6

MICHIGAN

97.1
97.5
97.1
97.3
95.8
96.5
96.7
97.1

MINNESOTA

98.4
98.7
98.1
99.0
97.0
97.6
97.8
98.4

MISSISSIPPI

93.5
95.1
94.1
96.4
94.3
95.0
94.0
95.5

MISSOURI

97.2
98.1
95.1
96.4
96.7
97.4
96.3
97.3

MONTANA

95.7
96.1
92.3
92.7
92.0
92.4
93.3
93.7

NEBRASKA

95.9
97.8
95.9
97.2
95.3
97.0
95.7
97.3

NEVADA

94.1
95.2
94.4
94.8
94.3
94.6
94.3
94.8

NEW HAMPSHIRE

98.5
99.1
98.0
98.5
98.4
98.7
98.3
98.8

NEW JERSEY

94.8
95.3
95.1
95.6
97.0
97.6
95.6
96.1

NEW MEXICO

92.3
93.4
95.3
96.2
90.9
91.7
92.8
93.8

NEW YORK

94.7
95.6
95.4
96.0
95.0
96.0
95.0
95.9

NORTH CAROLINA

95.3
96.4
95.5
97.1
93.9
95.4
94.9
96.3

NORTH DAKOTA

98.5
99.1
98.3
98.6
97.6
98.0
98.1
98.5

OHIO

97.5
98.2
96.6
97.0
97.1
97.5
97.1
97.6

OKLAHOMA

96.0
96.5
97.3
97.9
96.5
97.4
96.6
97.3

OREGON

98.2
98.3
97.3
98.1
99.0
99.2
98.2
98.5

PENNSYLVANIA

97.6
98.0
97.9
98.3
98.6
99.0
98.0
98.4

RHODE ISLAND

96.0
96.6
97.4
97.7
96.3
97.1
96.6
97.1

SOUTH CAROLINA

94.6
95.4
95.0
95.7
92.1
92.7
93.9
94.6

SOUTH DAKOTA

96.9
97.9
97.6
98.0
96.8
97.4
97.1
97.7

TENNESSEE

92.6
93.2
93.1
93.5
93.8
94.9
93.2
93.9

TEXAS

94.7
95.5
95.2
95.8
94.8
95.4
94.9
95.6

UTAH

96.2
96.6
96.7
96.9
96.7
96.7
96.5
96.7

VERMONT

97.1
98.0
98.2
98.7
98.9
99.4
98.1
98.7

VIRGINIA

95.4
95.9
96.4
96.7
96.3
96.3
96.0
96.3

WASHINGTON

98.7
99.1
97.6
98.4
98.4
98.6
98.2
98.7

WEST VIRGINIA

94.9
95.5
95.2
95.9
95.9
96.3
95.3
95.9

WISCONSIN

96.6
97.3
97.0
97.4
98.4
98.4
97.3
97.7

WYOMING

98.4
98.7
96.3
97.2
97.1
97.6
97.2
97.8
14

Table 3

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by State

2010

ANNUAL

MARCH

JULY

NOVEMBER

AVERAGE

Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit Avail Unit

Avail

UNITED STATES

96.0
96.7
96.0
96.6
95.5
96.1
95.8
96.4

ALABAMA

96.5
97.0
95.1
95.3
94.1
94.6
95.2
95.6

ALASKA

97.1
98.7
97.8
98.7
96.4
97.9
97.1
98.4

ARIZONA

93.5
93.9
95.3
95.8
96.9
97.2
95.2
95.6

ARKANSAS

92.5
93.1
93.8
94.5
93.8
94.4
93.4
94.0

CALIFORNIA

97.0
97.7
96.9
97.6
95.4
96.1
96.4
97.1

COLORADO

98.8
99.1
97.2
97.6
97.2
97.9
97.7
98.2

CONNECTICUT

98.6
99.0
97.3
97.8
97.8
98.2
97.9
98.3

DELAWARE

97.7
97.9
96.9
97.5
97.8
98.0
97.4
97.8

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

91.0
91.8
93.0
94.1
89.1
89.9
91.1
91.9

FLORIDA

94.0
95.2
93.9
94.6
93.3
94.2
93.7
94.7

GEORGIA

93.1
93.7
93.4
94.4
92.5
92.8
93.0
93.6

HAWAII

96.9
97.4
95.7
96.3
94.5
95.0
95.7
96.2

IDAHO

97.6
97.8
98.1
98.5
98.1
98.1
97.9
98.1

ILLINOIS

95.6
96.3
95.7
96.1
94.2
95.2
95.2
95.9

INDIANA

91.7
92.3
93.0
93.2
92.7
93.2
92.5
92.9

IOWA

98.5
98.7
97.3
97.5
97.3
97.5
97.7
97.9

KANSAS

98.1
98.5
97.5
97.8
96.7
97.0
97.5
97.8

KENTUCKY

95.1
95.8
95.3
95.9
94.7
95.5
95.0
95.7

LOUISIANA

95.8
96.8
96.9
97.8
96.9
97.9
96.5
97.5

MAINE

98.5
99.1
98.3
98.9
97.6
98.4
98.2
98.8

MARYLAND

97.5
97.9
95.3
95.5
95.8
96.3
96.2
96.6

MASSACHUSETTS

98.3
98.7
98.1
98.6
96.5
97.3
97.6
98.2

MICHIGAN

97.0
97.6
97.1
97.2
96.4
96.8
96.8
97.2

MINNESOTA

98.3
98.7
99.0
99.4
98.2
98.6
98.5
98.9

MISSISSIPPI

96.7
97.3
96.0
96.6
95.3
96.9
96.0
96.9

MISSOURI

95.9
96.9
96.6
97.5
96.0
96.8
96.1
97.1

MONTANA

95.2
95.7
94.6
95.7
94.8
94.8
94.9
95.4

NEBRASKA

95.2
97.1
95.6
97.0
96.0
97.2
95.6
97.1

NEVADA

96.3
97.1
97.3
97.7
96.3
97.3
96.6
97.4

NEW HAMPSHIRE

98.5
98.8
98.3
98.6
97.8
97.8
98.2
98.4

NEW JERSEY

96.2
96.7
95.4
96.7
96.2
96.7
95.9
96.7

NEW MEXICO

92.5
93.7
93.4
93.9
91.5
92.3
92.4
93.3

NEW YORK

95.6
96.3
95.6
96.4
93.4
94.4
94.8
95.7

NORTH CAROLINA

96.0
97.0
95.9
96.6
94.7
95.8
95.5
96.5

NORTH DAKOTA

98.3
98.9
98.3
98.7
98.8
98.8
98.5
98.8

OHIO

97.4
97.5
96.1
96.5
96.7
97.1
96.7
97.0

OKLAHOMA

96.7
97.3
95.2
96.1
95.3
96.2
95.7
96.5

OREGON

97.9
98.7
97.7
98.0
97.2
97.6
97.6
98.1

PENNSYLVANIA

98.5
98.7
97.8
98.4
98.2
98.6
98.2
98.5

RHODE ISLAND

97.3
97.7
97.2
97.7
97.0
97.8
97.2
97.8

SOUTH CAROLINA

94.8
95.0
93.8
94.0
94.5
94.5
94.3
94.5

SOUTH DAKOTA

98.4
98.6
97.5
97.8
97.4
98.0
97.8
98.1

TENNESSEE

91.3
92.8
93.0
94.6
92.2
92.8
92.2
93.4

TEXAS

94.8
95.7
95.4
96.0
95.5
96.1
95.2
95.9

UTAH

96.6
97.1
96.4
96.4
97.1
97.3
96.7
96.9

VERMONT

98.5
98.7
97.6
98.5
98.4
98.7
98.1
98.6

VIRGINIA

95.4
95.6
94.6
95.2
95.9
96.2
95.3
95.7

WASHINGTON

97.9
98.4
98.1
98.4
98.4
98.7
98.1
98.5

WEST VIRGINIA

95.9
96.5
96.6
96.7
96.2
96.7
96.2
96.6

WISCONSIN

98.5
99.0
98.6
98.7
97.9
98.3
98.3
98.6

WYOMING

97.8
98.4
96.5
97.5
97.5
97.9
97.3
98.0
15

Table 3

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by State

2011

MARCH

JULY

Unit Avail Unit Avail

UNITED STATES

95.9
96.5
95.6
96.3

ALABAMA

96.6
96.6
96.5
97.7

ALASKA

96.4
97.5
95.6
96.9

ARIZONA

96.5
96.7
93.9
94.2

ARKANSAS

96.2
96.5
93.8
94.2

CALIFORNIA

96.3
96.8
95.8
96.5

COLORADO

96.7
97.2
97.9
98.2

CONNECTICUT

97.4
97.6
98.5
98.8

DELAWARE

97.3
97.4
97.0
97.2

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

93.0
93.7
93.0
93.4

FLORIDA

93.1
93.9
92.7
93.8

GEORGIA

93.2
93.8
93.8
94.2

HAWAII

96.0
96.2
94.9
95.4

IDAHO

96.7
97.3
96.0
96.5

ILLINOIS

95.8
96.5
94.7
95.3

INDIANA

93.3
93.6
91.9
92.4

IOWA

98.3
98.9
97.9
98.4

KANSAS

97.8
98.0
97.7
98.2

KENTUCKY

94.9
95.7
94.9
96.2

LOUISIANA

98.1
98.2
98.0
98.6

MAINE

98.7
98.9
97.7
98.1

MARYLAND

95.0
95.3
95.1
95.8

MASSACHUSETTS

98.1
98.6
97.0
97.6

MICHIGAN

97.8
98.1
96.9
97.2

MINNESOTA

98.3
98.6
97.9
98.1

MISSISSIPPI

95.3
96.2
96.8
96.8

MISSOURI

96.1
97.4
96.2
97.2

MONTANA

96.4
97.0
95.0
95.8

NEBRASKA

97.0
98.0
97.6
97.8

NEVADA

96.0
96.7
97.9
98.0

NEW HAMPSHIRE

97.6
98.2
98.3
98.3

NEW JERSEY

95.0
95.9
96.6
97.1

NEW MEXICO

92.6
94.0
92.0
92.8

NEW YORK

94.0
94.5
94.6
95.2

NORTH CAROLINA

96.1
97.3
95.4
96.7

NORTH DAKOTA

97.8
98.3
98.5
98.8

OHIO

97.0
97.5
96.7
97.0

OKLAHOMA

96.3
97.3
95.1
96.1

OREGON

98.1
98.2
97.7
98.1

PENNSYLVANIA

98.2
98.5
97.5
97.8

RHODE ISLAND

96.8
97.6
97.6
97.8

SOUTH CAROLINA

94.8
95.5
95.6
96.0

SOUTH DAKOTA

98.5
98.9
97.8
97.9

TENNESSEE

93.4
94.3
91.4
93.0

TEXAS

95.4
96.0
95.8
96.9

UTAH

97.2
97.4
95.8
96.3

VERMONT

98.6
98.6
98.1
98.6

VIRGINIA

95.0
95.6
95.2
95.7

WASHINGTON

98.5
98.7
98.4
98.5

WEST VIRGINIA

96.9
97.2
94.7
95.6

WISCONSIN

97.4
97.7
96.3
96.8

WYOMING

97.5
97.6
98.2
98.9
16

Table 4

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.2
95.9
95.8
96.4
91.3
92.3
91.6
92.5

UNDER $5,000

83.0
85.5
84.9
87.5
80.7
82.3
74.7
78.9
$5,000 - $7,499
86.6
88.5
87.6
89.3
83.5
86.2
83.8
86.6
$7,500 - $9,999
89.0
90.1
89.6
90.6
86.9
87.9
86.3
88.1
$10,000 - $12,499
90.8
91.9
90.7
91.8
89.0
90.8
85.7
87.8
$12,500 - $14,999
93.5
94.3
93.6
94.6
93.5
93.5
88.8
90.7
$15,000 - $19,999
94.2
94.5
94.9
95.1
91.7
92.1
91.3
91.3
$20,000 - $24,999
94.6
95.3
95.1
95.7
92.5
93.5
92.7
92.7
$25,000 - $29,999
95.0
96.2
95.4
96.4
93.1
95.5
92.4
93.2
$30,000 - $34,999
96.6
97.1
96.8
97.3
95.0
95.0
94.2
95.1
$35,000 - $39,999
96.1
97.0
96.3
97.0
93.4
96.4
91.9
93.0
$40,000 - $49,999
96.9
97.5
97.2
97.7
94.4
95.3
95.0
95.9
$50,000 - $59,999
97.7
98.3
97.9
98.4
96.5
97.2
96.1
97.3
$60,000 - $74,999
98.3
98.8
98.6
99.0
94.8
95.9
97.9
98.4
$75,000 - $99,999
98.8
99.0
99.0
99.3
97.2
97.2
97.5
98.1
$100,000 - $149,999
98.8
99.3
98.8
99.3
98.4
98.4
99.4
99.7
$150,000 +
98.9
99.4
98.8
99.3
99.9
100.0
99.9
99.9

JULY 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.4
96.1
96.1
96.7
91.0
92.0
92.0
93.1

UNDER $5,000

84.1
86.8
85.4
88.0
78.8
82.4
76.4
80.6
$5,000 - $7,499
88.0
90.2
88.4
91.0
87.1
88.3
86.5
89.6
$7,500 - $9,999
90.3
92.4
90.6
91.9
91.0
93.1
89.6
91.1
$10,000 - $12,499
92.3
93.5
93.1
94.1
90.1
91.1
86.9
89.0
$12,500 - $14,999
91.8
93.2
92.4
93.5
89.4
90.6
82.5
85.9
$15,000 - $19,999
93.9
94.4
95.0
95.5
88.3
89.0
92.3
92.7
$20,000 - $24,999
95.9
96.4
96.4
97.1
92.8
92.8
94.0
94.7
$25,000 - $29,999
94.8
95.8
94.8
96.0
94.8
95.4
89.4
91.2
$30,000 - $34,999
95.2
96.2
95.9
96.7
91.2
92.3
93.5
95.0
$35,000 - $39,999
97.4
97.8
97.6
98.1
95.7
96.1
96.9
96.9
$40,000 - $49,999
97.4
98.0
97.5
98.0
97.2
97.9
95.6
96.4
$50,000 - $59,999
98.5
98.9
98.7
99.1
96.4
96.9
95.1
96.5
$60,000 - $74,999
98.2
98.5
98.5
98.8
94.3
94.7
98.0
98.0
$75,000 - $99,999
98.9
99.1
99.2
99.4
97.3
98.2
99.7
99.7
$100,000 - $149,999
98.8
99.3
98.9
99.4
96.0
97.2
98.6
99.2
$150,000 +
98.8
99.1
98.9
99.2
98.5
98.5
97.8
99.1

NOVEMBER 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.0
95.7
95.8
96.4
90.6
91.6
91.4
92.4

UNDER $5,000

82.8
85.6
87.0
89.5
76.4
79.6
79.1
83.3
$5,000 - $7,499
86.8
88.0
88.7
90.3
82.4
83.1
83.5
86.6
$7,500 - $9,999
88.9
89.9
89.7
90.7
85.0
86.1
82.1
83.0
$10,000 - $12,499
90.8
92.2
91.4
92.9
88.6
89.3
83.8
86.4
$12,500 - $14,999
92.7
93.6
93.4
94.1
90.7
92.5
90.7
90.7
$15,000 - $19,999
92.9
94.0
93.5
94.7
89.6
90.9
90.7
91.8
$20,000 - $24,999
93.9
94.5
94.5
94.8
89.5
91.9
89.5
90.1
$25,000 - $29,999
95.1
95.9
95.5
96.4
92.0
92.5
90.4
91.7
$30,000 - $34,999
95.5
96.0
95.9
96.5
93.3
93.7
94.1
94.4
$35,000 - $39,999
96.8
97.5
97.2
97.9
94.2
94.7
95.0
95.6
$40,000 - $49,999
97.3
98.1
97.5
98.3
97.1
98.1
97.3
97.8
$50,000 - $59,999
97.6
98.3
97.9
98.6
95.9
96.8
94.4
95.9
$60,000 - $74,999
98.3
98.7
98.4
98.8
98.4
98.4
96.7
97.9
$75,000 - $99,999
98.2
98.6
98.5
98.9
95.5
96.0
98.1
99.0
$100,000 - $149,999
99.0
99.3
99.0
99.2
99.6
100.0
98.9
99.5
$150,000 +
99.0
99.3
99.0
99.3
97.6
97.6
98.9
99.0
17

Table 4

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

2008 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.2
95.9
95.9
96.5
91.0
91.9
91.7
92.7

UNDER $5,000

83.3
86.0
85.7
88.3
78.6
81.5
76.7
80.9
$5,000 - $7,499
87.1
88.9
88.2
90.2
84.4
85.9
84.6
87.6
$7,500 - $9,999
89.4
90.8
90.0
91.1
87.6
89.0
86.0
87.4
$10,000 - $12,499
91.3
92.5
91.7
92.9
89.2
90.4
85.5
87.8
$12,500 - $14,999
92.7
93.7
93.1
94.1
91.2
92.2
87.3
89.1
$15,000 - $19,999
93.6
94.3
94.5
95.1
89.8
90.7
91.4
91.9
$20,000 - $24,999
94.8
95.4
95.3
95.9
91.6
92.7
92.1
92.5
$25,000 - $29,999
95.0
96.0
95.3
96.2
93.3
94.4
90.7
92.0
$30,000 - $34,999
95.8
96.4
96.2
96.8
93.2
93.7
93.9
94.8
$35,000 - $39,999
96.7
97.5
97.1
97.7
94.4
95.7
94.6
95.1
$40,000 - $49,999
97.2
97.9
97.4
98.0
96.2
97.1
96.0
96.7
$50,000 - $59,999
97.9
98.5
98.2
98.7
96.3
97.0
95.2
96.6
$60,000 - $74,999
98.2
98.6
98.5
98.9
95.9
96.4
97.6
98.1
$75,000 - $99,999
98.6
98.9
98.9
99.2
96.7
97.1
98.4
98.9
$100,000 - $149,999
98.8
99.3
98.9
99.3
98.0
98.5
99.0
99.5
$150,000 +
98.9
99.3
98.9
99.3
98.6
98.7
98.9
99.3

MARCH 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.6
96.3
96.2
96.8
92.4
93.5
92.3
93.2

UNDER $5,000

86.1
88.4
87.9
89.6
81.0
84.5
81.9
83.2
$5,000 - $7,499
90.4
91.5
90.1
91.0
90.3
91.8
88.3
88.3
$7,500 - $9,999
91.1
92.4
92.4
93.9
87.6
88.2
89.6
91.5
$10,000 - $12,499
91.2
92.7
91.8
92.9
91.2
92.0
89.3
91.6
$12,500 - $14,999
92.7
93.9
93.4
94.5
87.9
90.2
88.5
90.1
$15,000 - $19,999
94.9
95.8
95.4
96.3
93.2
93.8
92.0
93.6
$20,000 - $24,999
95.0
95.7
95.2
95.7
94.4
95.7
89.5
89.9
$25,000 - $29,999
95.9
96.4
96.4
97.0
94.0
94.9
94.5
95.2
$30,000 - $34,999
96.3
97.2
96.6
97.2
96.1
97.2
92.4
93.4
$35,000 - $39,999
97.1
97.4
96.9
97.2
97.9
98.2
94.8
95.4
$40,000 - $49,999
98.1
98.6
98.3
98.6
96.7
98.8
97.5
97.6
$50,000 - $59,999
97.9
98.4
98.1
98.6
96.3
97.0
96.2
97.0
$60,000 - $74,999
98.3
98.6
98.4
98.7
98.3
98.3
97.7
98.1
$75,000 - $99,999
98.4
99.1
98.5
99.1
98.0
99.2
98.7
99.6
$100,000 - $149,999
99.0
99.4
99.1
99.4
97.8
98.1
99.4
100.0
$150,000 +
99.6
99.7
99.6
99.8
97.3
98.3
98.7
98.7

JULY 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.4
96.9
92.2
93.2
92.6
93.4

UNDER $5,000

86.2
88.0
87.8
89.3
83.9
86.5
82.6
84.1
$5,000 - $7,499
85.9
87.8
87.3
88.7
84.9
87.0
82.9
84.0
$7,500 - $9,999
90.6
92.3
90.3
92.3
92.3
93.2
86.6
87.8
$10,000 - $12,499
91.8
92.6
92.3
93.0
90.7
91.5
89.1
90.0
$12,500 - $14,999
93.3
94.5
94.5
95.2
87.8
90.3
92.8
94.0
$15,000 - $19,999
94.7
95.3
96.1
96.6
88.1
89.1
92.7
94.7
$20,000 - $24,999
96.0
96.6
96.0
96.6
96.2
97.4
92.0
93.1
$25,000 - $29,999
96.3
96.7
96.3
96.7
96.0
96.4
91.9
92.6
$30,000 - $34,999
96.5
97.0
96.7
97.0
95.9
96.8
93.5
94.2
$35,000 - $39,999
97.4
98.1
97.7
98.4
95.3
96.0
96.5
97.4
$40,000 - $49,999
97.4
98.0
97.3
98.0
96.8
97.2
94.7
96.2
$50,000 - $59,999
98.5
98.8
98.9
99.1
96.7
97.8
97.5
97.7
$60,000 - $74,999
98.6
98.8
98.7
98.8
97.6
98.0
98.3
98.3
$75,000 - $99,999
98.6
99.1
98.8
99.2
99.5
99.5
97.2
97.7
$100,000 - $149,999
99.1
99.4
99.3
99.5
97.5
98.1
99.1
99.1
$150,000 +
99.2
99.4
99.2
99.4
99.2
100.0
96.0
96.1
18

Table 4

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

NOVEMBER 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.3
96.9
91.8
92.9
93.0
93.8

UNDER $5,000

85.5
87.5
89.2
91.0
79.0
81.4
85.4
87.3
$5,000 - $7,499
90.4
92.0
90.6
92.5
89.8
91.0
86.7
88.8
$7,500 - $9,999
90.2
92.2
92.8
94.2
82.2
85.6
92.7
94.2
$10,000 - $12,499
93.2
94.0
93.9
94.5
89.9
91.2
90.5
91.4
$12,500 - $14,999
94.0
95.3
94.7
95.7
90.1
92.7
91.5
92.5
$15,000 - $19,999
94.7
95.6
94.8
95.8
94.3
95.5
93.0
94.1
$20,000 - $24,999
95.4
95.9
95.9
96.4
92.5
92.8
92.0
93.2
$25,000 - $29,999
96.0
96.8
96.4
97.2
93.9
94.7
90.5
91.9
$30,000 - $34,999
96.9
97.6
97.4
97.9
94.6
95.9
94.7
96.1
$35,000 - $39,999
97.5
97.8
97.7
98.0
95.9
96.8
96.4
96.4
$40,000 - $49,999
97.8
98.1
97.9
98.1
96.2
97.6
96.1
96.4
$50,000 - $59,999
98.2
98.6
98.4
98.8
96.7
96.7
97.1
98.1
$60,000 - $74,999
98.7
99.1
98.7
99.1
98.1
98.4
98.5
99.2
$75,000 - $99,999
98.6
98.9
98.7
99.0
97.6
97.6
97.6
97.6
$100,000 - $149,999
98.8
99.1
99.0
99.3
95.3
96.7
97.0
97.5
$150,000 +
98.7
99.2
98.7
99.1
99.8
99.8
100.0
100.0
2009 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.3
96.8
92.1
93.2
92.6
93.5

UNDER $5,000

85.9
88.0
88.3
90.0
81.3
84.1
83.3
84.9
$5,000 - $7,499
88.9
90.4
89.3
90.7
88.3
90.0
86.0
87.0
$7,500 - $9,999
90.7
92.3
91.8
93.5
87.4
89.0
89.7
91.2
$10,000 - $12,499
92.1
93.1
92.6
93.5
90.6
91.6
89.6
91.0
$12,500 - $14,999
93.3
94.5
94.2
95.2
88.6
91.0
90.9
92.2
$15,000 - $19,999
94.8
95.5
95.4
96.2
91.9
92.8
92.6
94.1
$20,000 - $24,999
95.5
96.1
95.7
96.3
94.4
95.3
91.2
92.1
$25,000 - $29,999
96.1
96.7
96.4
96.9
94.6
95.3
92.3
93.2
$30,000 - $34,999
96.6
97.2
96.9
97.4
95.5
96.6
93.5
94.6
$35,000 - $39,999
97.3
97.8
97.4
97.9
96.4
97.0
95.9
96.4
$40,000 - $49,999
97.7
98.2
97.9
98.3
96.6
97.9
96.1
96.7
$50,000 - $59,999
98.2
98.6
98.5
98.8
96.6
97.2
96.9
97.6
$60,000 - $74,999
98.5
98.8
98.6
98.9
98.0
98.2
98.2
98.5
$75,000 - $99,999
98.6
99.0
98.7
99.1
98.4
98.7
97.8
98.3
$100,000 - $149,999
99.0
99.3
99.1
99.4
96.9
97.6
98.5
98.9
$150,000 +
99.2
99.4
99.2
99.4
98.8
99.4
98.2
98.2

MARCH 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

96.0
96.7
96.5
97.1
93.1
94.1
93.6
94.7

UNDER $5,000

89.9
91.5
90.0
91.5
89.2
90.8
88.4
91.7
$5,000 - $7,499
90.5
92.2
90.2
91.4
92.4
94.1
86.5
87.4
$7,500 - $9,999
91.5
92.7
93.2
94.1
88.3
90.6
91.0
92.6
$10,000 - $12,499
92.8
94.2
93.4
94.6
91.7
93.4
87.9
91.7
$12,500 - $14,999
92.6
93.6
93.2
94.2
90.0
90.4
91.5
92.7
$15,000 - $19,999
94.3
95.5
95.1
95.9
90.9
92.8
92.5
94.1
$20,000 - $24,999
95.8
96.3
95.9
96.4
95.6
95.9
94.6
95.4
$25,000 - $29,999
96.7
97.4
96.8
97.5
96.0
96.7
95.1
96.3
$30,000 - $34,999
96.9
97.7
97.3
98.1
94.3
95.5
94.3
96.5
$35,000 - $39,999
96.9
97.5
96.9
97.5
95.9
96.6
94.4
95.1
$40,000 - $49,999
97.6
98.1
97.6
98.1
97.6
97.9
95.5
96.6
$50,000 - $59,999
98.0
98.8
98.2
98.8
96.3
97.9
97.1
97.8
$60,000 - $74,999
98.4
98.9
98.5
99.0
97.5
97.8
98.4
99.1
$75,000 - $99,999
98.9
99.2
99.0
99.3
98.2
98.6
98.8
98.8
$100,000 - $149,999
98.7
99.0
98.8
99.1
96.9
96.9
96.4
96.4
$150,000 +
99.5
99.7
99.5
99.7
99.2
99.2
99.4
100.0
19

Table 4

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

JULY 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

96.0
96.6
96.5
97.0
93.1
93.9
93.5
94.6

UNDER $5,000

89.5
91.0
89.5
91.4
88.7
89.7
88.5
90.9
$5,000 - $7,499
89.8
91.6
90.3
92.3
89.4
90.9
87.8
90.4
$7,500 - $9,999
92.3
93.1
92.4
92.9
92.2
94.2
91.9
91.9
$10,000 - $12,499
92.9
94.1
93.7
94.6
91.9
93.3
88.5
90.1
$12,500 - $14,999
94.6
95.4
94.9
95.4
93.5
94.5
90.9
91.4
$15,000 - $19,999
95.4
95.9
96.1
96.6
92.7
93.4
94.3
95.5
$20,000 - $24,999
95.3
96.0
96.0
96.5
92.7
93.4
93.3
94.5
$25,000 - $29,999
96.0
96.5
96.1
96.7
95.0
95.0
93.5
94.8
$30,000 - $34,999
96.1
96.4
96.2
96.5
96.2
96.2
94.0
94.0
$35,000 - $39,999
97.7
98.0
97.9
98.1
96.9
97.4
96.8
97.2
$40,000 - $49,999
97.8
98.3
98.0
98.4
96.7
97.4
96.5
97.6
$50,000 - $59,999
97.9
98.6
98.1
98.6
96.4
98.0
96.7
97.6
$60,000 - $74,999
98.4
98.9
98.3
98.9
98.5
98.5
96.9
99.0
$75,000 - $99,999
98.5
99.0
98.7
99.3
97.7
97.7
98.2
98.6
$100,000 - $149,999
98.7
99.1
99.0
99.3
96.9
97.6
98.7
100.0
$150,000 +
99.0
99.4
99.2
99.5
97.0
97.0
99.9
100.0

NOVEMBER 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.5
96.1
96.1
96.7
91.9
92.8
92.1
93.2

UNDER $5,000

87.6
88.6
87.7
88.7
88.3
89.4
83.2
85.2
$5,000 - $7,499
88.8
90.0
90.6
91.8
83.8
85.1
83.7
85.4
$7,500 - $9,999
90.6
91.8
92.1
93.4
86.6
87.0
90.1
92.4
$10,000 - $12,499
92.1
93.1
93.5
94.5
89.0
89.8
90.3
91.5
$12,500 - $14,999
93.9
94.4
94.9
95.4
90.5
91.1
93.1
94.0
$15,000 - $19,999
94.4
95.5
95.0
95.8
92.5
94.8
91.3
92.1
$20,000 - $24,999
95.8
96.6
96.0
96.8
95.1
96.2
92.6
95.1
$25,000 - $29,999
95.4
96.1
96.1
96.9
93.1
93.1
93.2
94.5
$30,000 - $34,999
97.0
97.4
97.3
97.7
95.7
96.6
96.6
97.1
$35,000 - $39,999
97.7
98.2
97.8
98.3
97.3
97.8
96.3
96.9
$40,000 - $49,999
97.3
97.8
97.5
97.9
95.3
95.9
95.6
96.0
$50,000 - $59,999
97.6
98.1
97.5
98.0
97.8
98.1
96.5
97.0
$60,000 - $74,999
98.1
98.5
98.4
98.7
96.5
97.5
98.0
98.4
$75,000 - $99,999
98.7
99.1
98.7
99.0
97.8
98.7
98.0
98.5
$100,000 - $149,999
98.8
99.3
99.0
99.4
96.4
97.8
98.7
99.4
$150,000 +
99.1
99.4
99.1
99.4
100.0
100.0
98.7
98.7
2010 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.8
96.4
96.4
96.9
92.7
93.6
93.1
94.2

UNDER $5,000

89.0
90.4
89.1
90.6
88.7
90.0
86.7
89.3
$5,000 - $7,499
89.7
91.3
90.4
91.8
88.5
90.0
86.0
87.7
$7,500 - $9,999
91.4
92.5
92.6
93.5
89.0
90.6
91.0
92.3
$10,000 - $12,499
92.6
93.8
93.5
94.6
90.9
92.2
88.9
91.1
$12,500 - $14,999
93.7
94.5
94.3
95.0
91.3
92.0
91.8
92.7
$15,000 - $19,999
94.7
95.6
95.4
96.1
92.0
93.7
92.7
93.9
$20,000 - $24,999
95.6
96.3
95.9
96.6
94.5
95.2
93.5
95.0
$25,000 - $29,999
96.0
96.7
96.3
97.0
94.7
95.0
93.9
95.2
$30,000 - $34,999
96.7
97.2
96.9
97.4
95.4
96.1
95.0
95.9
$35,000 - $39,999
97.4
97.9
97.5
97.9
96.7
97.3
95.9
96.4
$40,000 - $49,999
97.6
98.0
97.7
98.1
96.5
97.1
95.9
96.7
$50,000 - $59,999
97.8
98.5
97.9
98.5
96.8
98.0
96.8
97.5
$60,000 - $74,999
98.3
98.8
98.4
98.9
97.5
97.9
97.7
98.8
$75,000 - $99,999
98.7
99.1
98.8
99.2
97.9
98.3
98.3
98.6
$100,000 - $149,999
98.7
99.1
98.9
99.3
96.7
97.4
98.0
98.6
$150,000 +
99.2
99.5
99.3
99.5
98.7
98.7
99.3
99.6
20

Table 4

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Income

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2011
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.9
96.5
96.7
97.2
91.8
92.7
93.3
94.1

UNDER $5,000

89.7
91.0
90.0
91.2
89.0
89.7
86.0
87.8
$5,000 - $7,499
88.6
89.7
88.4
89.8
88.4
88.8
83.2
83.2
$7,500 - $9,999
90.0
91.6
93.5
95.0
81.9
83.9
89.3
91.5
$10,000 - $12,499
92.9
93.6
93.6
94.3
91.4
92.1
91.3
92.4
$12,500 - $14,999
94.3
94.8
95.4
96.0
91.5
91.5
92.9
93.2
$15,000 - $19,999
95.4
95.9
96.2
96.6
93.5
94.7
92.8
93.1
$20,000 - $24,999
95.3
95.9
96.5
96.9
90.7
92.6
93.1
94.1
$25,000 - $29,999
96.0
96.6
96.7
97.2
93.6
94.0
94.0
94.4
$30,000 - $34,999
96.4
96.9
96.6
97.1
95.4
95.4
91.4
92.6
$35,000 - $39,999
97.7
98.2
98.0
98.3
96.4
98.1
98.7
98.7
$40,000 - $49,999
97.5
98.0
97.9
98.3
95.6
96.8
96.6
97.4
$50,000 - $59,999
98.0
98.4
98.1
98.3
97.1
98.5
96.0
96.3
$60,000 - $74,999
98.7
98.9
98.9
99.1
97.4
97.4
97.9
98.5
$75,000 - $99,999
98.5
98.9
98.8
99.2
98.1
98.1
98.4
99.6
$100,000 - $149,999
99.2
99.4
99.2
99.5
97.2
97.2
97.6
98.5
$150,000 +
99.1
99.6
99.1
99.7
99.2
99.2
98.4
100.0

JULY 2011
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.6
96.3
96.1
96.7
93.0
93.6
92.6
93.7

UNDER $5,000

88.0
89.5
87.7
89.5
87.5
88.4
82.2
85.8
$5,000 - $7,499
89.7
90.3
89.9
90.7
90.7
91.1
86.6
86.9
$7,500 - $9,999
92.2
93.3
92.0
93.2
93.1
93.5
92.8
94.3
$10,000 - $12,499
92.6
94.2
94.3
95.7
89.8
90.9
93.6
94.7
$12,500 - $14,999
94.5
95.7
94.3
95.8
96.4
96.9
92.5
94.4
$15,000 - $19,999
94.7
95.5
95.5
96.2
91.4
92.6
91.3
93.8
$20,000 - $24,999
96.2
97.0
96.3
97.0
95.8
96.8
92.7
94.0
$25,000 - $29,999
96.1
96.7
96.5
97.0
94.7
94.7
92.9
93.6
$30,000 - $34,999
96.5
97.0
96.5
97.1
95.6
96.1
95.8
97.1
$35,000 - $39,999
96.9
97.4
97.1
97.7
94.9
95.5
96.0
96.9
$40,000 - $49,999
97.7
98.4
97.9
98.6
96.6
96.6
96.7
97.9
$50,000 - $59,999
97.9
98.3
97.9
98.3
96.5
97.5
96.2
97.1
$60,000 - $74,999
98.3
98.8
98.3
98.8
97.6
97.9
97.1
97.1
$75,000 - $99,999
98.9
99.1
98.9
99.1
99.0
99.0
98.0
98.2
$100,000 - $149,999
98.6
99.1
98.8
99.3
95.6
96.8
98.5
99.0
$150,000 +
99.4
99.8
99.4
99.8
100.0
100.0
98.1
99.0
21

Table 5

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Household Size

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.2
95.9
95.8
96.4
91.3
92.3
91.6
92.5
1 PERSON
92.7
93.7
93.5
94.5
88.1
89.1
86.7
88.0
2 - 3
96.1
96.6
96.6
97.1
93.0
93.8
91.4
92.1
4 - 5
96.5
97.1
97.1
97.6
92.7
94.0
94.1
95.0
6 +
95.4
95.9
96.0
96.5
92.6
93.1
93.2
94.2

JULY 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.4
96.1
96.1
96.7
91.0
92.0
92.0
93.1
1 PERSON
93.0
94.1
94.2
95.2
87.0
88.2
87.4
89.3
2 - 3
96.1
96.7
96.6
97.1
92.7
93.5
91.8
93.0
4 - 5
96.8
97.3
97.2
97.6
93.7
94.6
94.0
95.0
6 +
95.4
95.9
96.3
96.6
91.3
93.0
94.0
94.5

NOVEMBER 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.0
95.7
95.8
96.4
90.6
91.6
91.4
92.4
1 PERSON
92.7
93.7
93.7
94.7
87.3
88.4
85.1
86.4
2 - 3
95.8
96.4
96.4
97.0
91.9
92.7
91.6
92.9
4 - 5
96.5
97.0
97.1
97.5
93.2
94.0
94.0
94.4
6+
94.8
95.4
95.0
95.6
93.1
93.6
92.8
94.1
2008 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.2
95.9
95.9
96.5
91.0
91.9
91.7
92.7
1 PERSON
92.8
93.8
93.8
94.8
87.5
88.6
86.4
87.9
2 - 3
96.0
96.6
96.6
97.1
92.6
93.3
91.6
92.7
4 - 5
96.6
97.1
97.1
97.5
93.2
94.2
94.0
94.8
6+
95.2
95.7
95.8
96.2
92.3
93.3
93.4
94.3

MARCH 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.6
96.3
96.2
96.8
92.4
93.5
92.3
93.2
1 PERSON
93.4
94.3
94.3
95.1
89.2
90.0
86.0
87.0
2 - 3
96.3
96.9
96.7
97.2
93.2
94.7
92.6
93.6
4 - 5
97.0
97.5
97.5
97.8
95.2
95.8
94.7
95.3
6 +
96.0
96.7
96.5
96.9
94.6
96.6
94.8
95.9

JULY 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.4
96.9
92.2
93.2
92.6
93.4
1 PERSON
93.5
94.5
94.4
95.3
89.1
90.4
86.9
88.0
2 - 3
96.5
97.0
97.1
97.4
93.1
94.0
93.0
93.9
4 - 5
96.8
97.1
97.2
97.5
94.6
95.6
94.8
95.4
6 +
95.7
96.0
95.9
96.1
95.5
96.1
93.2
93.9
22

Table 5

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Household Size

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

NOVEMBER 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.3
96.9
91.8
92.9
93.0
93.8
1 PERSON
93.6
94.5
94.6
95.4
89.3
90.5
88.3
90.0
2 - 3
96.4
96.9
96.9
97.4
93.1
94.1
92.9
93.8
4 - 5
96.8
97.2
97.5
97.7
92.3
93.6
94.9
95.4
6+
96.5
96.9
96.5
96.8
95.9
96.5
95.2
95.4
2009 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.3
96.8
92.1
93.2
92.6
93.5
1 PERSON
93.5
94.4
94.4
95.3
89.2
90.3
87.0
88.4
2 - 3
96.4
96.9
96.9
97.3
93.2
94.3
92.9
93.7
4 - 5
96.9
97.3
97.4
97.7
94.0
95.0
94.8
95.4
6+
96.1
96.5
96.3
96.6
95.3
96.4
94.4
95.1

MARCH 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

96.0
96.7
96.5
97.1
93.1
94.1
93.6
94.7
1 PERSON
94.2
95.1
94.9
95.7
91.2
92.5
88.9
89.9
2 - 3
96.7
97.3
97.1
97.5
94.1
95.0
94.5
95.4
4 - 5
96.8
97.4
97.3
97.9
93.6
94.3
94.2
95.9
6+
96.2
96.8
96.6
97.2
93.8
94.8
95.3
96.3

JULY 2010
TOTAL

96.0
96.6
96.5
97.0
93.1
93.9
93.5
94.6
1 PERSON
94.1
95.1
94.8
95.6
90.9
92.2
91.1
92.5
2 - 3
96.6
97.1
97.0
97.5
93.8
94.3
93.4
94.8
4 - 5
96.9
97.4
97.4
97.8
94.6
95.5
94.7
95.6
6+
95.9
96.1
95.7
96.0
94.8
94.8
93.9
94.2

NOVEMBER 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.5
96.1
96.1
96.7
91.9
92.8
92.1
93.2
1 PERSON
93.4
94.2
94.3
95.0
89.8
90.6
87.4
88.8
2 - 3
96.3
96.9
96.8
97.4
92.9
93.7
92.5
93.7
4 - 5
96.2
96.7
96.9
97.3
92.8
93.8
93.5
94.3
6+
95.4
96.0
95.6
96.1
93.9
94.9
94.0
94.9
2010 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.8
96.4
96.4
96.9
92.7
93.6
93.1
94.2
1 PERSON
93.9
94.8
94.7
95.4
90.6
91.8
89.1
90.4
2 - 3
96.5
97.1
97.0
97.5
93.6
94.4
93.5
94.6
4 - 5
96.6
97.1
97.2
97.6
93.6
94.5
94.1
95.3
6+
95.8
96.3
96.0
96.4
94.1
94.8
94.4
95.1
23

Table 5

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Household Size

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2011
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.9
96.5
96.7
97.2
91.8
92.7
93.3
94.1
1 PERSON
93.9
94.7
95.2
95.8
88.4
89.6
89.6
90.4
2 - 3
96.6
97.1
97.2
97.6
93.4
94.0
93.3
94.3
4 - 5
97.0
97.5
97.6
98.0
93.6
94.5
94.8
95.5
6+
96.0
96.3
96.3
96.6
95.7
96.1
94.5
94.8

JULY 2011
TOTAL

95.6
96.3
96.1
96.7
93.0
93.6
92.6
93.7
1 PERSON
93.5
94.4
94.4
95.2
90.0
90.8
89.2
90.4
2 - 3
96.5
97.0
96.8
97.3
94.6
95.0
93.3
94.6
4 - 5
96.5
97.0
96.7
97.3
94.3
94.9
92.8
93.6
6+
95.5
96.1
95.4
96.1
94.9
95.7
94.7
95.2
24

Table 6

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Householder's Age

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.2
95.9
95.8
96.4
91.3
92.3
91.6
92.5
15 - 24 YRS OLD
90.2
92.1
91.4
93.0
85.4
89.0
85.9
87.4
25 - 54 YRS OLD
94.9
95.5
95.4
96.0
91.2
92.1
91.5
92.5
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.0
96.6
96.6
97.1
91.9
93.0
93.1
93.8
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.7
97.2
97.0
97.6
93.7
94.4
93.9
94.7
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.9
97.2
97.5
97.8
92.1
92.4
96.4
96.4
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.7
97.1
97.1
97.4
94.1
94.1
94.6
94.9

JULY 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.4
96.1
96.1
96.7
91.0
92.0
92.0
93.1
15-24 YRS OLD
91.7
92.7
92.3
93.2
89.3
90.3
88.4
89.4
25-54 YRS OLD
95.0
95.8
95.6
96.4
90.8
92.0
92.0
93.3
55-59 YRS OLD
96.3
96.7
96.8
97.3
92.6
92.6
93.4
93.8
60-64 YRS OLD
96.4
96.9
97.0
97.6
91.4
92.0
94.0
95.5
65-69 YRS OLD
96.3
96.7
97.0
97.4
92.7
93.0
91.6
93.1
70-99 YRS OLD
96.8
97.2
97.5
97.8
91.5
92.0
93.6
94.0

NOVEMBER 2008
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.0
95.7
95.8
96.4
90.6
91.6
91.4
92.4
15 - 24 YRS OLD
90.7
92.6
91.7
93.7
84.3
86.3
88.0
90.4
25 - 54 YRS OLD
94.7
95.4
95.4
96.1
90.6
91.7
91.1
92.1
55 - 59 YRS OLD
95.8
96.2
96.5
96.9
90.2
90.8
93.7
94.3
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.5
96.9
97.1
97.4
93.2
93.5
94.8
94.8
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.2
96.6
96.9
97.3
93.1
93.1
91.8
92.2
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.4
97.0
96.8
97.4
93.1
93.3
94.5
94.8
2008 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.2
95.9
95.9
96.5
91.0
91.9
91.7
92.7
15 - 24 YRS OLD
90.8
92.5
91.8
93.3
86.4
88.5
87.5
89.1
25 - 54 YRS OLD
94.8
95.6
95.5
96.2
90.9
91.9
91.5
92.6
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.0
96.5
96.7
97.1
91.6
92.1
93.4
94.0
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.5
97.0
97.1
97.5
92.8
93.3
94.2
95.0
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.5
96.9
97.1
97.5
92.6
92.8
93.3
93.9
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.6
97.1
97.1
97.5
92.9
93.2
94.2
94.6

MARCH 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.6
96.3
96.2
96.8
92.4
93.5
92.3
93.2
15 - 24 YRS OLD
91.5
93.0
92.1
93.4
87.9
89.8
86.6
88.3
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.2
96.0
95.8
96.4
92.1
93.3
92.4
93.3
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.5
97.0
97.2
97.5
91.6
92.9
95.2
95.2
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.5
97.1
97.4
97.8
92.7
94.2
90.5
90.5
65 - 69 YRS OLD
97.5
97.9
97.9
98.2
95.2
95.9
94.9
95.7
70 - 99 YRS OLD
97.0
97.3
97.2
97.6
95.7
95.9
96.2
96.6

JULY 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.4
96.9
92.2
93.2
92.6
93.4
15-24 YRS OLD
91.5
92.9
92.1
93.2
89.3
91.3
85.5
87.0
25-54 YRS OLD
95.2
95.9
95.8
96.4
91.8
92.8
92.7
93.6
55-59 YRS OLD
96.4
97.0
97.1
97.5
93.2
94.6
95.8
95.8
60-64 YRS OLD
97.4
97.7
97.8
98.1
94.7
94.7
95.2
95.7
65-69 YRS OLD
97.3
97.5
97.7
98.0
93.7
93.7
95.3
95.3
70-99 YRS OLD
97.2
97.7
97.7
98.1
93.5
94.7
93.9
94.6
25

Table 6

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Householder's Age

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

NOVEMBER 2009
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.3
96.9
91.8
92.9
93.0
93.8
15 - 24 YRS OLD
93.1
93.9
93.6
94.4
90.9
91.6
90.4
91.4
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.2
95.9
95.9
96.5
91.2
92.5
92.9
93.7
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.8
97.2
97.3
97.6
94.2
94.9
95.0
95.2
60 - 64 YRS OLD
97.0
97.5
97.6
98.0
92.7
93.8
95.1
96.3
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.8
97.3
97.5
97.9
92.8
93.7
93.5
95.3
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.6
97.0
97.0
97.5
93.0
93.4
93.6
94.1
2009 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.7
96.3
96.3
96.8
92.1
93.2
92.6
93.5
15 - 24 YRS OLD
92.0
93.3
92.6
93.7
89.4
90.9
87.5
88.9
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.2
95.9
95.8
96.4
91.7
92.9
92.6
93.5
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.6
97.0
97.2
97.5
93.0
94.1
95.3
95.4
60 - 64 YRS OLD
97.0
97.5
97.6
98.0
93.4
94.2
93.6
94.2
65 - 69 YRS OLD
97.2
97.6
97.7
98.0
93.9
94.4
94.6
95.4
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.9
97.3
97.3
97.7
94.1
94.6
94.6
95.1

MARCH 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

96.0
96.7
96.5
97.1
93.1
94.1
93.6
94.7
15 - 24 YRS OLD
93.8
94.8
94.6
95.6
90.9
92.2
92.6
93.8
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.8
96.5
96.3
96.9
92.9
94.1
93.6
94.9
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.6
97.2
97.2
97.7
93.5
94.2
93.5
94.3
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.1
96.5
96.8
97.1
91.6
91.9
92.5
92.8
65 - 69 YRS OLD
97.0
97.4
97.4
97.7
95.6
95.6
96.4
97.0
70 - 99 YRS OLD
97.0
97.6
97.2
97.7
95.1
96.0
93.5
94.4

JULY 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLD

96.0
96.6
96.5
97.0
93.1
93.9
93.5
94.6
15 - 24 YRS OLD
93.3
94.4
94.2
95.3
89.3
90.9
89.2
90.3
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.7
96.3
96.1
96.7
93.2
93.9
93.8
95.0
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.9
97.4
97.4
97.9
93.9
95.2
94.7
95.8
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.1
96.7
96.7
97.3
91.8
92.6
95.3
96.1
65 - 69 YRS OLD
97.2
97.5
97.5
97.9
95.3
95.7
93.4
94.8
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.6
97.1
97.0
97.5
93.8
94.5
93.4
93.8

NOVEMBER 2010
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.5
96.1
96.1
96.7
91.9
92.8
92.1
93.2
15 - 24 YRS OLD
93.3
94.2
93.6
94.4
91.0
92.9
88.6
88.8
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.0
95.7
95.6
96.3
91.6
92.4
92.6
93.6
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.4
96.8
97.3
97.6
93.1
93.4
94.5
94.6
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.5
97.1
96.6
97.2
95.1
95.7
91.0
92.5
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.2
96.8
97.0
97.6
88.8
90.1
92.2
93.3
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.4
96.8
97.0
97.4
92.3
93.1
90.5
93.0
2010 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.8
96.4
96.4
96.9
92.7
93.6
93.1
94.2
15 - 24 YRS OLD
93.5
94.5
94.1
95.1
90.4
92.0
90.1
91.0
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.5
96.2
96.0
96.6
92.6
93.5
93.3
94.5
55 - 59 YRS OLD
96.6
97.1
97.3
97.7
93.5
94.3
94.2
94.9
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.2
96.7
96.7
97.2
92.8
93.4
92.9
93.8
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.8
97.3
97.3
97.7
93.2
93.8
94.0
95.0
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.7
97.2
97.1
97.5
93.7
94.5
92.5
93.7
26

Table 6

Percentage of Households with a Telephone by Householder's Age

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2011
TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS

95.9
96.5
96.7
97.2
91.8
92.7
93.3
94.1
15 - 24 YRS OLD
92.8
93.8
93.3
94.1
90.5
91.9
90.1
91.3
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.9
96.4
96.6
97.1
92.0
92.8
93.7
94.6
55 - 59 YRS OLD
95.8
96.3
96.9
97.3
90.1
91.1
92.2
92.5
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.2
96.8
96.8
97.3
93.8
95.2
90.4
91.9
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.5
96.7
97.1
97.3
92.4
92.4
94.8
95.0
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.9
97.4
97.4
97.9
92.1
92.1
94.8
95.5

JULY 2011
TOTAL HOUSEHOLD

95.6
96.3
96.1
96.7
93.0
93.6
92.6
93.7
15 - 24 YRS OLD
93.8
94.4
93.7
94.4
94.0
94.7
88.4
90.0
25 - 54 YRS OLD
95.3
96.1
95.8
96.6
92.2
93.0
92.7
93.8
55 - 59 YRS OLD
95.9
96.4
96.3
96.9
93.3
93.5
93.8
94.3
60 - 64 YRS OLD
96.2
96.8
96.5
97.2
94.2
94.5
94.3
95.1
65 - 69 YRS OLD
96.7
97.2
96.9
97.2
97.8
98.2
92.4
94.5
70 - 99 YRS OLD
96.4
96.9
96.9
97.3
93.2
93.8
94.5
95.3
27

Table 7

Percentage of Adults with a Telephone by Labor Force Status

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2008
TOTAL CNP

95.9
96.4
96.4
96.9
92.3
93.1
92.8
93.6

EMPLOYED

96.5
97.1
96.8
97.4
93.7
94.6
93.1
93.9

UNEMPLOYED

93.2
94.0
93.7
94.5
90.1
90.9
89.8
91.6

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.1
95.6
95.8
96.3
90.4
91.1
92.6
93.2

JULY 2008
TOTAL CNP

96.0
96.6
96.5
97.0
92.4
93.3
92.8
93.7

EMPLOYED

96.4
97.0
96.9
97.4
93.3
94.3
93.1
94.0

UNEMPLOYED

94.3
95.0
94.8
95.5
92.3
93.2
92.8
93.5

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.3
95.9
96.0
96.5
90.9
91.8
92.1
93.1

NOVEMBER 2008
TOTAL CNP

95.7
96.3
96.3
96.9
92.0
92.9
92.6
93.6

EMPLOYED

96.3
96.9
96.7
97.3
93.6
94.4
93.5
94.3

UNEMPLOYED

93.7
94.5
95.3
95.9
88.2
89.9
90.9
91.5

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

94.8
95.4
95.6
96.2
90.4
91.2
91.4
92.4
2008 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL CNP

95.8
96.4
96.4
96.9
92.3
93.1
92.7
93.6

EMPLOYED

96.4
97.0
96.8
97.3
93.5
94.4
93.2
94.1

UNEMPLOYED

93.7
94.5
94.6
95.3
90.2
91.3
91.2
92.2

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.1
95.6
95.8
96.3
90.6
91.4
92.0
92.9

MARCH 2009
TOTAL CNP

96.2
96.7
96.6
97.1
93.4
94.5
93.6
94.4

EMPLOYED

96.6
97.1
96.9
97.4
94.3
95.3
93.4
94.2

UNEMPLOYED

94.9
95.6
95.3
95.9
93.0
94.1
94.1
94.8

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.7
96.3
96.4
96.8
92.3
93.5
93.9
94.7

JULY 2009
TOTAL CNP

96.2
96.7
96.7
97.1
93.4
94.3
93.6
94.3

EMPLOYED

96.7
97.2
97.0
97.4
94.4
95.3
93.5
94.2

UNEMPLOYED

94.6
95.5
95.5
96.1
91.9
93.6
93.7
94.5

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.7
96.2
96.3
96.8
92.2
93.1
93.7
94.5

NOVEMBER 2009
TOTAL CNP

96.2
96.8
96.7
97.2
92.9
94.0
94.0
94.6

EMPLOYED

96.8
97.3
97.1
97.5
94.4
95.4
94.0
94.6

UNEMPLOYED

94.7
95.4
95.5
95.9
90.7
92.4
93.9
94.3

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.5
96.1
96.2
96.8
91.5
92.4
94.1
94.6
2009 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL CNP

96.2
96.7
96.7
97.1
93.2
94.2
93.7
94.4

EMPLOYED

96.7
97.2
97.0
97.5
94.4
95.4
93.7
94.3

UNEMPLOYED

94.6
95.5
95.5
96.0
91.5
93.2
93.8
94.4

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.6
96.2
96.3
96.8
92.0
92.9
93.8
94.5
28

Table 7

Percentage of Adults with a Telephone by Labor Force Status

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

Unit

Avail

MARCH 2010
TOTAL CNP

96.5
97.0
96.8
97.3
94.1
94.9
94.4
95.5

EMPLOYED

96.9
97.5
97.2
97.8
94.8
95.6
94.6
95.7

UNEMPLOYED

95.4
96.1
95.3
95.9
95.3
95.9
94.6
95.8

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.8
96.4
96.4
96.9
92.8
93.7
94.0
95.1

JULY 2010
TOTAL CNP

96.4
96.9
96.8
97.3
93.9
94.5
94.1
95.1

EMPLOYED

96.8
97.4
97.1
97.6
94.7
95.4
94.3
95.3

UNEMPLOYED

95.4
95.9
95.9
96.3
93.2
94.0
93.5
94.2

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.8
96.3
96.3
96.8
92.9
93.4
94.0
94.8

NOVEMBER 2010
TOTAL CNP

95.9
96.5
96.5
97.0
92.6
93.4
93.0
93.9

EMPLOYED

96.5
97.1
96.9
97.4
93.8
94.7
93.5
94.3

UNEMPLOYED

94.4
95.0
95.0
95.6
92.3
93.1
92.9
93.7

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.2
95.8
96.1
96.6
90.8
91.8
92.2
93.4
2010 ANNUAL AVERAGE
TOTAL CNP

96.3
96.8
96.7
97.2
93.5
94.3
93.8
94.8

EMPLOYED

96.8
97.3
97.1
97.6
94.5
95.2
94.1
95.1

UNEMPLOYED

95.1
95.6
95.4
95.9
93.6
94.3
93.6
94.6

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.6
96.2
96.3
96.8
92.2
93.0
93.4
94.4

MARCH 2011
TOTAL CNP

96.4
96.9
96.9
97.4
93.0
93.7
94.1
94.8

EMPLOYED

97.0
97.5
97.4
97.8
94.8
95.6
94.4
95.2

UNEMPLOYED

95.5
96.0
96.2
96.5
93.1
94.2
94.8
95.3

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.4
96.0
96.3
96.9
90.5
91.1
93.2
94.0

JULY 2011
TOTAL CNP

96.2
96.7
96.5
97.1
94.0
94.5
93.5
94.4

EMPLOYED

96.7
97.3
96.9
97.5
94.9
95.5
93.8
94.7

UNEMPLOYED

95.1
95.7
95.9
96.6
91.9
92.2
92.8
94.2

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

95.5
96.0
95.9
96.5
93.4
93.8
93.2
93.9
29

Table 8

Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by State

In Unit

Available

UNITED STATES

0.7%
0.7%

ALABAMA

6.4%
7.7%

ALASKA

6.0%
7.5%

ARIZONA

6.7%
6.1%

ARKANSAS

5.5%
4.7%

CALIFORNIA

2.4%
2.4%

COLORADO

4.4%
5.0%

CONNECTICUT

4.2%
4.0%

DELAWARE

5.2%
5.7%

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

6.3%
6.3%

FLORIDA

2.8%
2.9%

GEORGIA

5.7%
5.0%

HAWAII

6.2%
6.2%

IDAHO

4.9%
4.6%

ILLINOIS

4.5%
5.1%

INDIANA

5.9%
5.9%

IOWA

4.3%
4.5%

KANSAS

4.9%
5.5%

KENTUCKY

5.5%
6.7%

LOUISIANA

8.5%
7.6%

MAINE

4.4%
4.4%

MARYLAND

4.3%
4.7%

MASSACHUSETTS

5.1%
5.3%

MICHIGAN

4.1%
4.3%

MINNESOTA

4.4%
4.6%

MISSISSIPPI

6.2%
6.5%

MISSOURI

4.4%
4.6%

MONTANA

5.7%
5.9%

NEBRASKA

6.0%
7.2%

NEVADA

4.8%
5.3%

NEW HAMPSHIRE

4.1%
4.0%

NEW JERSEY

4.5%
4.7%

NEW MEXICO

8.5%
9.9%

NEW YORK

3.3%
3.6%

NORTH CAROLINA

4.6%
4.9%

NORTH DAKOTA

5.6%
5.1%

OHIO

3.9%
3.8%

OKLAHOMA

5.5%
5.3%

OREGON

5.1%
4.9%

PENNSYLVANIA

3.4%
3.6%

RHODE ISLAND

5.0%
4.9%

SOUTH CAROLINA

5.1%
6.1%

SOUTH DAKOTA

4.9%
4.9%

TENNESSEE

6.3%
5.4%

TEXAS

3.1%
3.3%

UTAH

5.4%
5.7%

VERMONT

4.8%
5.0%

VIRGINIA

4.4%
4.4%

WASHINGTON

5.6%
7.9%

WEST VIRGINIA

4.9%
5.5%

WISCONSIN

4.7%
4.4%

WYOMING

4.6%
4.4%
30

Table 9

Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Income

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

TOTAL

0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
2.2%
2.0%
2.3%
2.4%

UNDER $5,000

8.8%
7.9%
10.5%
9.8%
14.9%
15.2%
21.9%
21.7%
$5,000 - $7,499
8.1%
7.0%
10.1%
9.0%
16.3%
16.2%
19.3%
17.7%
$7,500 - $9,999
8.8%
8.5%
10.2%
10.0%
18.5%
17.6%
23.0%
23.9%
$10,000 - $12,499
7.7%
7.8%
8.4%
8.6%
17.3%
16.0%
19.2%
21.3%
$12,500 - $14,999
7.7%
7.9%
8.9%
9.0%
19.3%
17.4%
18.0%
18.7%
$15,000 - $19,999
6.1%
5.9%
6.7%
6.5%
16.0%
14.1%
15.3%
14.6%
$20,000 - $24,999
5.9%
5.5%
6.4%
6.2%
15.2%
15.2%
15.1%
15.8%
$25,000 - $29,999
6.0%
6.3%
6.5%
6.6%
17.3%
16.5%
13.8%
13.5%
$30,000 - $34,999
5.8%
5.6%
6.3%
6.4%
16.5%
16.7%
14.5%
13.7%
$35,000 - $39,999
5.9%
6.2%
6.4%
6.5%
18.0%
18.2%
16.5%
16.4%
$40,000 - $49,999
4.7%
4.6%
4.9%
4.7%
15.4%
14.6%
14.1%
13.2%
$50,000 - $59,999
5.2%
5.8%
5.6%
6.1%
17.2%
18.6%
17.5%
18.3%
$60,000 - $74,999
4.5%
4.7%
4.9%
5.1%
17.3%
17.2%
16.0%
16.3%
$75,000 - $99,999
4.5%
4.7%
4.7%
4.9%
18.2%
18.3%
18.2%
17.6%
$100,000 - $149,999
5.0%
5.0%
5.2%
5.1%
23.7%
27.5%
22.7%
21.9%
$150,000 +
6.5%
6.6%
6.8%
7.1%
35.5%
34.7%
28.3%
31.3%

Table 10

Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Household Size

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

TOTAL

0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
2.2%
2.0%
2.3%
2.4%
1 PERSON
2.6%
2.5%
3.0%
2.8%
7.0%
6.6%
9.4%
10.0%
2 - 3
1.4%
1.4%
1.5%
1.4%
4.8%
4.5%
5.3%
5.5%
4 - 5
2.4%
2.4%
2.6%
2.7%
8.2%
7.9%
5.6%
5.4%
6 +
6.7%
6.3%
7.8%
7.8%
18.9%
15.5%
12.7%
11.5%

Table 11

Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Householder's Age

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

TOTAL

0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
2.2%
2.0%
2.3%
2.4%
15-24 YRS OLD
4.9%
5.1%
5.7%
5.8%
11.7%
11.6%
10.8%
10.2%
25-54 YRS OLD
1.0%
1.0%
1.1%
1.1%
3.0%
2.7%
3.1%
2.9%
55-59 YRS OLD
2.9%
2.8%
3.1%
3.2%
10.7%
11.4%
14.5%
14.8%
60-64 YRS OLD
3.3%
3.4%
3.4%
3.6%
13.8%
14.6%
15.8%
18.0%
65-69 YRS OLD
3.6%
3.6%
3.8%
4.0%
14.8%
16.1%
20.0%
21.7%
70-99 YRS OLD
2.0%
1.9%
2.0%
2.1%
8.7%
8.0%
12.4%
11.9%

Table 12

Critical Values for Determining Significant Differences by Labor Force Status

RACE

HISPANIC

TOTAL

WHITE

BLACK

ORIGIN

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

In Unit Available

TOTAL CNP

0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.3%
1.2%
1.6%
1.3%

EMPLOYED

0.8%
0.8%
0.8%
0.9%
2.8%
2.9%
3.2%
3.3%

UNEMPLOYED

5.2%
4.8%
6.2%
5.8%
12.0%
12.0%
20.3%
20.9%

NOT IN LABOR FORCE

1.3%
1.3%
1.4%
1.5%
4.0%
4.3%
5.1%
5.2%
31

Customer Response


Publication:
Telephone Subscribership in the United States (Data through July 2011)

You can help us provide the best possible information to the public by completing this form and returning it to
the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of the FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau.

1.
Please check the category that best describes you:
____
press

____
current telecommunications carrier

____
potential telecommunications carrier

____
business customer evaluating vendors/service options

____
consultant, law firm, lobbyist

____
other business customer
____
academic/student
____
residential
customer
____
FCC
employee

____
other federal government employee

____
state or local government employee

____
Other (please specify)

2.
Please rate the report: Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion

Data accuracy
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)

Data presentation
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)

Timeliness of data
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)

Completeness of data
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)

Text clarity

(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)

Completeness of text
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)

3.
Overall, how do you Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion

rate this report?
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)
(_)

4.
How can this report be improved?

5.
May we contact you to discuss possible improvements?
Name:

Telephone
#:

To discuss this report contact Jay Schwarz at 202-418-0948.
Fax this response to
or
Mail this response to
202-418-0520

FCC/WCB/IATD
Washington, DC 20554


Document Outline

  • SubscriberText_July2011_v5
  • ta1
  • figure1
  • ta2
  • figure2
  • figure3
  • figure4
  • figures5thru7
  • ta3-12
  • CustomerResponse_SubscriberJuly2011

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.