Harris CapRock Communications Inc
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
October 18, 2012
The Law Office of Raul Magallanes, PLLC
P.O. Box 1213
Friendswood, TX 77549
Call Sign: E060157
File No.: SES-MOD-20120509-00427
Dear Mr. Magallanes:
On May 9, 2012, Harris CapRock Communications, Inc. (Harris CapRock) filed the above-
captioned modification application to add Intellian V60 and V80 antennas to its earth station
license. We dismiss this application without prejudice to refiling.1
Section 25.112(a) of the Commission’s rules, requires the Commission to return, as unacceptable
for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal
inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission’s rules2. The application
is defective for the following reasons:
The values submitted in FCC Form 312 Schedule B (Schedule B) for antenna model Intellian
V60 are inconsistent. The EIRP densities entered in Item E49 in the Schedule B, for emission
designators 3M00G7W and 567KG7W, -22.30 dBW/4kHz, are inconsistent with the maximum
EIRP per carrier values of 44.29 dBW for the 3M00G7W and 37.22 dBW for the 567KG7W
emission designators. Our calculations indicate that EIRP density per carrier should be 15.5
dBW/4kHz and 15.71 dBW/4kHz respectively.
The values submitted in the Schedule B for antenna model V80 are also inconsistent. The EIRP
densities entered in Item E49 in the Schedule B, for emission designators 1M50G7W and
284KG7W, -20.13 dBW/4kHz, are inconsistent with the maximum EIRP per carrier values of
44.78 for the 1M50G7W and 37.80 for the 284KG7W emission designators. Our calculations
indicate that EIRP density per carrier should be 19.33 dBW/4kHz and 19.28 dBW/4kHz
respectively.
Furthermore, the above inconsistencies negate the off axis EIRP compliance certifications that
Harris CapRock provided in Exhibits C though D of your application. Given these
inconsistencies, we cannot accept this application for filing.
1
If Harris CapRock refiles an application in which the deficiencies identified in this letter have been
corrected but otherwise identical to the one dismissed, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. §
1.1111(d).
2 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a) of the Commission’s rules and Section 0.261 of the
Commission’s rules on delegations of authority,3 we dismiss the application of Harris CapRock
Communications.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Blais
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Satellite Division
International Bureau
3 47.C.F.R. § 25.112(a) and 47 C.F.R. § 0.261.
2
Washington, D.C. 20554
October 18, 2012
DA 12-1673
Mr. Raul MagallanesThe Law Office of Raul Magallanes, PLLC
P.O. Box 1213
Friendswood, TX 77549
Call Sign: E060157
File No.: SES-MOD-20120509-00427
Dear Mr. Magallanes:
On May 9, 2012, Harris CapRock Communications, Inc. (Harris CapRock) filed the above-
captioned modification application to add Intellian V60 and V80 antennas to its earth station
license. We dismiss this application without prejudice to refiling.1
Section 25.112(a) of the Commission’s rules, requires the Commission to return, as unacceptable
for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal
inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission’s rules2. The application
is defective for the following reasons:
The values submitted in FCC Form 312 Schedule B (Schedule B) for antenna model Intellian
V60 are inconsistent. The EIRP densities entered in Item E49 in the Schedule B, for emission
designators 3M00G7W and 567KG7W, -22.30 dBW/4kHz, are inconsistent with the maximum
EIRP per carrier values of 44.29 dBW for the 3M00G7W and 37.22 dBW for the 567KG7W
emission designators. Our calculations indicate that EIRP density per carrier should be 15.5
dBW/4kHz and 15.71 dBW/4kHz respectively.
The values submitted in the Schedule B for antenna model V80 are also inconsistent. The EIRP
densities entered in Item E49 in the Schedule B, for emission designators 1M50G7W and
284KG7W, -20.13 dBW/4kHz, are inconsistent with the maximum EIRP per carrier values of
44.78 for the 1M50G7W and 37.80 for the 284KG7W emission designators. Our calculations
indicate that EIRP density per carrier should be 19.33 dBW/4kHz and 19.28 dBW/4kHz
respectively.
Furthermore, the above inconsistencies negate the off axis EIRP compliance certifications that
Harris CapRock provided in Exhibits C though D of your application. Given these
inconsistencies, we cannot accept this application for filing.
1
If Harris CapRock refiles an application in which the deficiencies identified in this letter have been
corrected but otherwise identical to the one dismissed, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. §
1.1111(d).
2 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)
Federal Communications Commission
DA 12-1673Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a) of the Commission’s rules and Section 0.261 of the
Commission’s rules on delegations of authority,3 we dismiss the application of Harris CapRock
Communications.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Blais
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Satellite Division
International Bureau
3 47.C.F.R. § 25.112(a) and 47 C.F.R. § 0.261.
2
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.
