Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Notice Of Apparent Liability, Encino Broadcasting, LLC

Download Options

Released: November 18, 2013

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-2205

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In re Application of

Encino Broadcasting, LLC

NAL/Acct. No. MB-201241410018
FRN: 0017558040
For Renewal of Licenses for

Station KELG(AM)
File No. BR-20130808AIG
Manor, Texas
Facility ID No. 17807
Station KOKE(AM)
File No. BR-20130808AIH
Pflugerville, Texas
Facility ID No. 54662
Station KTXZ(AM)
File No. BR-20130808AII
West Lake Hills, Texas
Facility ID No. 59278




Adopted: November 18, 2013

Released: November 18, 2013

By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau:


The Media Bureau (“Bureau”) has before it the applications of Encino Broadcasting,
LLC (“Licensee”), for renewal of its licenses for Stations KELG(AM), Manor, Texas; KOKE(AM),
Pflugerville, Texas; and KTXZ(AM), West Lake Hills, Texas (collectively, “Stations”). In this
Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”),1 we find that
Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 73.3539 of the Rules,2 by failing to file timely license
renewal applications for the Stations, and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 301 of the
Act,3 by engaging in unauthorized operation of the Stations after its authorizations for the Stations had
expired. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Licensee is
apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000). We also
reinstate the Stations’ call signs.


Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for
broadcast stations must be filed “not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the

1 This NAL is issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
(“Act”), and Section 1.80 of the Commission’s rules (“Rules”). See 47 U.S.C. §§ 309(k), 503(b); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80.
The Bureau has delegated authority to issue the NAL under Section 0.283 of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.283.
2 See 47 C.F.R. § 73.3539.
3 See 47 U.S.C. § 301.

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-2205

expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.”4 Applications for renewal of the Stations’ licenses
should have been filed by April 1, 2013. No such applications were filed. On July 30, 2013, the staff
wrote to Licensee, indicating that the Stations’ licenses would expire on August 1, 2013, and that: (1) all
authority to operate the Station would terminate as of August 1, 2013; and (2) the Station’s call letters
would be deleted from the Commission’s database.5 Licensee was advised that any operation of the
Stations after August 1, 2013, was unauthorized.6 On August 8, 2013, License filed the captioned license
renewal applications for the Stations. On August 12, 2013, Licensee filed requests for Special Temporary
Authority (“STA”) to continue the Stations’ operations pending consideration of the license renewal
applications.7 It also filed a Petition for Reconsideration (“Petition”) of the License Expiration Letter on
August 28, 2013, in which it seeks reinstatement of the Stations’ licenses and call signs.
In both the STA Requests and the Petition, Licensee acknowledges that it did not timely
file the license renewal applications for the Stations, but indicates that Mr. Jose J. Garcia, Jr., the manager
and sole owner of the Stations, has suffered through a succession of serious and debilitating illnesses, is
being treated by a number of different physicians, and has been hospitalized or been to hospital
emergency rooms on a constant basis since 2008. Accordingly, Licensee indicates, Mr. Garcia has not
been able to attend fully to his broadcast duties. Licensee indicates that his health is improving and he
hopes to assume additional duties.8


Proposed Forfeiture. In this case, the Licensee failed to file a timely license renewal
application for Stations KELG(AM), KOKE(AM), and KTXZ(AM), as required by Section 73.3539(a) of
the Rules. Moreover, it continued operating the Stations for two weeks after the licenses had expired on
August 1, 2013, before filing the appropriate renewal applications and seeking STA to so operate, in
violation of Section 301 of the Act. Licensees are obligated to comply fully with the Rules, including
filing a timely renewal application and maintaining in effect the station’s authorization.9 Here, the
Licensee did not do so.
This NAL is issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(1)(B) of the Act. Under that provision, a
person who is found to have willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with any provision of the Act or any
rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture
penalty.10 Section 312(f)(1) of the Act defines willful as “the conscious and deliberate commission or
omission of [any] act, irrespective of any intent to violate” the law.11 The legislative history to Section
312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both Sections 312 and 503(b) of the
Act,12 and the Commission has so interpreted the term in the Section 503(b) context.13 Section 312(f)(2)

4 47 C.F.R. § 73.3539(a).
5 Letter to Jose J. Garcia (MB Jul. 30, 2013) (“License Expiration Letter”).
6 Id.
7 See File Nos. BLSTA-20130812ACC (KELG(AM)), BLSTA-20130812ACF (KOKE(AM)), BLSTA-
20130812ACB (KTXZ(AM)) (collectively, “STA Requests”). The staff granted the STA Requests on October 21,
2013. Letter to Lee J. Peltzman, Esq., Ref. 1800B3 (MB Oct. 21, 2013).
8 See STA Requests at Exhibit 38; Petition at 2.
9 See, e.g., Hemmingford Media, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 14 FCC Rcd 2940, 2941-2 (CIB 1999) (responsibility for
complying with terms of station license “rests solely and exclusively with the licensee”) (citing Empire
Broadcasting Corp
., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 25 FCC 2d 68 (1970)).
10 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. 1.80(a)(1).
11 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1).
12 See H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982).

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-2205

of the Act provides that “[t]he term ‘repeated,’ when used with reference to the commission or omission
of any act, means the commission or omission of such act more than once or, if such commission or
omission is continuous, for more than one day.”14
The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules
establish a base forfeiture amount of $3,000 for the failure to file a required form.15 The guidelines also
specify a base forfeiture amount of $10,000 for construction and/or operation without an instrument of
authorization for the service.16 In determining the appropriate forfeiture amount, we may adjust the base
amount upward or downward by considering the factors enumerated in Section 503(b)(2)(D) of the Act,
including “the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation, and, with respect to the violator,
the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice
may require.”17
Typically, we have assessed forfeitures in the amount of $7,000 against licensees of full-
service stations for violations of Section 73.3539 of the Rules and Section 301 of the Act.18 In this case,
however, Licensee’s unauthorized operation spanned a period of two weeks after its license had expired
before it filed the appropriate renewal applications and STA Requests. Taking into consideration these
facts and all of the factors required by Section 503(b)(2)(D) of the Act and the Forfeiture Policy
, we propose a forfeiture for the full $3,000 amount, for the failure to timely file the Renewal
Application for the Station, and a reduced $3,000 amount for the Station’s two-week period of
unauthorized operation.19 Thus, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 for each Station, for a
total amount of $18,000.
License Renewal Application. In evaluating an application for license renewal, the
Commission’s decision is governed by Section 309(k) of the Act.20 That section provides that if, upon
consideration of the application and pleadings, we find that: (1) the station has served the public interest,
convenience, and necessity; (2) there have been no serious violations of the Act or the Rules; and (3)
there have been no other violations which, taken together, constitute a pattern of abuse, we are to grant
the renewal application.21 If, however, the licensee fails to meet that standard, the Commission may deny
the application – after notice and opportunity for a hearing under Section 309(e) of the Act – or grant the

13 See Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 (1991),
recon. denied, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).
14 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(2).
15 See Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80(b) of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture
Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17113-15 (1997) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), recon. denied,
15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b)(4), note to paragraph (b)(4), Section I.
16 A broadcast station requires an authorization from the Commission to operate. See 47 U.S.C. § 301.
17 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(D); see also Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17100; 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b)(4).
18 See, e.g., Media Associates, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 26 FCC Rcd 3703 (MB 2011) ($7,000 forfeiture issued for
unauthorized operation of more than one year after the station’s license had expired); Schweitzer Media, Inc.,
Forfeiture Order, 26 FCC Rcd 3707 (MB 2011) ($7,000 forfeiture issued for unauthorized operation of more than
one year after the station’s license had expired).
19 See, e.g., Gospel Media, Inc., Letter, 19 FCC Rcd 15600 (MB 2004) (proposing a $6,000 forfeiture where licensee
failed to timely file license renewal application and operated station without authorization for two weeks).
20 47 U.S.C. § 309(k).
21 47 U.S.C. § 309(k)(1).

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-2205

application “on terms and conditions that are appropriate, including a renewal for a term less than the
maximum otherwise permitted.”22
We find that the Licensee’s apparent violations of Section 73.3539 of the Rules and
Section 301 of the Act do not constitute “serious violations” warranting designation for evidentiary
hearing. Moreover, we find no evidence of violations that, when considered together, constitute a pattern
of abuse.23 Further, we find that the Stations served the public interest, convenience, and necessity during
the subject license term. We will, therefore, grant Licensee’s Petition and reinstate the Stations’ call
signs, and we will grant the captioned license renewal applications by separate action upon the conclusion
of this forfeiture proceeding if there are no issues other than the apparent violations that would preclude
grant of the applications.


Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.80 of the Commission’s Rules, that Encino Broadcasting, LLC, is
hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE in the amount of eighteen
thousand dollars ($18,000) for its apparent willful violation of Section 73.3539 of the Commission’s
Rules and its apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission’s Rules, that,
within thirty (30) days of the release date of this NAL, Encino Broadcasting, LLC, SHALL PAY the full
amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation
of the proposed forfeiture.
Payment of the proposed forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable
to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No.
and FRN No. referenced in the caption above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to
Federal Communications Commission, at P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000. Payment by
overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank—Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005
Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number
021030004, receiving bank: TREAS NYC, BNF: FCC/ACV--27000001 and account number as expressed
on the remittance instrument. If completing the FCC Form 159, enter the NAL/Account number in block
number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters “FORF” in block number 24A (payment type code).
Licensee will also send electronic notification on the date said payment is made to and
The response, if any, must be mailed to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington DC 20554, ATTN: Peter H. Doyle, Chief, Audio
Division, Media Bureau, and MUST INCLUDE the NAL/Acct. No. referenced above.
The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a
claim of inability to pay unless the respondent submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-

22 47 U.S.C. §§ 309(k)(2), 309(k)(3).
23 For example, we do not find here that the Licensee's operation of the Stations "was conducted in an exceedingly
careless, inept and negligent manner and that the licensee is either incapable of correcting or unwilling to correct the
operating deficiencies." See Heart of the Black Hills Stations, Decision, 32 FCC 2d 196, 198 (1971). Nor do we
find on the record here that "the number, nature and extent" of the violations indicate that "the licensee cannot be
relied upon to operate [the station] in the future in accordance with the requirements of its licenses and the
Commission's Rules." Id. at 200. See also Center for Study and Application of Black Economic Development,
Hearing Designation Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4622 (1991), Calvary Educational Broadcasting Network, Inc., Hearing
Designation Order, 7 FCC Rcd 4037 (1992).

Federal Communications Commission

DA 13-2205

year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices
(“GAAP”); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the
respondent’s current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for
the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted.
Requests for full payment of the forfeiture proposed in this NAL under the installment
plan should be sent to: Associate Managing Director-Financial Operations, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625, Washington, DC 20554.24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the August 28, 2013, Petition for Reconsideration filed
by Encino Broadcasting, LLC, IS GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the call signs KELG(AM), KOKE(AM), and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copies of this NAL shall be sent, by First Class and
Certified Mail-Return Receipt Requested, to Encino Broadcasting, LLC, 9434 Parkfield Drive, Austin,
TX 78758, and to its counsel, Lee J. Peltzman, Esq., Shainis & Peltzman, Chartered, 1850 M Street N.W.,
Suite 240, Washington, DC 20036.
Peter H. Doyle

Chief, Audio Division
Media Bureau

24 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914.

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.


You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.