Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Prepared Remarks of FCC Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn at "The Future of the Internet" Public Hearing, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Download Options

Released: August 20, 2010

Prepared Remarks of FCC Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn

At "The Future of the Internet" Public Hearing

Minneapolis, Minnesota

August 19, 2010

Thank you, Amalia for that kind introduction and many thanks to Free Press,
Main Street Project, and Center for Media Justice for inviting me to participate. I am
really happy to be here with you, your great Senator Al Franken, and my good friend and
colleague, Commissioner Michael Copps.
Now many of you already know this, but I must reaffirm that the American
people have a champion in my colleague, Commissioner Copps. For the last ten years, he
has been the consistent voice for consumers at the FCC. He puts people first. He fights
for First Amendment values, diversity of ownership, and voices in the communications
space. He advocates for an open Internet for the American people.
At the FCC, we follow seniority when we speak, so it is not easy for me because I
always have to follow Commissioner Copps. He is so thorough and convincing that it's
hard for me not to just say "I second that!" or "Amen!", so please indulge me as I find my
footing.
With each passing day, the Internet becomes more vital and essential in our lives.
Whether it's finding a job, receiving comprehensive health care, accessing educational
materials, news and information, or participating in our democratic society--more
Americans rely on the Internet each and every day.
And on that point, there is significant agreement. The President recently said that
the Internet is "vital infrastructure" and "has become central to the daily economic life of
almost every American." And the U. S. Congress charged the FCC with developing our
National Broadband Plan to ensure that high-speed Internet is available to all
Americans--no matter where they live, and set aside over $7 billion in the Recovery Act
for grants to build out broadband, and to encourage its adoption and use.
The current success of the Internet is due largely to its open architecture. It is a
tremendous "technological leap." Commissioner Copps has noted, and I agree that the
Internet may have as democratizing an effect on society, as the printing press. Never
before have media upstarts been able to reach such large audiences, in so short a time.
And if you think I am prone to exaggeration, remember that companies such as
Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter have all been founded since 2003! New and innovative
media companies are constantly starting-up today, citizen journalism is on the rise, blogs
have an increasing influence on public discourse, and media providers from broadcast
networks to newspapers are shifting their strategies online.
For these reasons and more, I say without hesitation, that an open Internet is
indeed the great equalizer. It enables traditionally underrepresented groups--like
minorities and women--to have an equal voice and an equal opportunity. It allows any

connected individual to distribute their ideas to a global network or run their business
right from their very own home.
Just as the printing press dramatically reduced the price of publishing and
disseminating works on a large scale, the Internet reduces the barriers to entry for new
players. The Internet has become a gateway to success for those in business, and in the
media, at a low capital cost.
So for these reasons, I am a firm believer in an open Internet, and I am also a
proponent of the Commission enacting rules to ensure an open Internet. But let me be
clear, when I say this, I am not talking about government regulating the content on the
Internet. This is about consumers--rather than corporations--maintaining control over
their online experience. This is about keeping the Internet open for new entrants, small
companies, people of all backgrounds and levels of experience and financial resources,
including people of color and women.
So while I support the ongoing dialogue and consensus building among interested
parties concerning the open Internet, I think that it is important for us to listen to all
participants, including consumer groups, organizations representing minorities and
women, and others whose futures are dependent on an open Internet.
An FCC study found that a greater percentage of African Americans and Latinos
access the internet only through their wireless handsets. So any proposal that treats fixed
and mobile Internet access to broadband differently would be problematic for me to
support.
Americans who cannot afford wired Internet in addition to wireless Internet
should also be guaranteed access to an open Internet. This is really a significant issue
when so many businesses and government agencies are moving their information strictly
online in order to save money.
Any proposal that favors the FCC being stripped of its rulemaking authority
regarding consumer protection and non-discrimination requirements, and any proposal
that would advocate that no agency will have authority over Internet access would be
impossible for me to embrace and should leave us all wondering, if that should ever
happen, exactly who is going to protect Internet consumers?
So while fundamentally I will affirm that there are many issues on which we
agree--there are key issues on which it will be harder to find consensus. And on the key
issues on which we disagree, I am hopeful that, going forward, we will be able to find
ways to express ourselves and our divergent points of views, in a manner that embraces
and encourages civility in an atmosphere of spirited discourse.
The American people deserve a decision that has had the benefit of a healthy
debate, and one that is grounded in the facts, law, and a sound analysis. I know a healthy
debate on the merits is possible. We have had them on many other policy issues. I have
high hopes that, in the policy debate about preserving open Internet principles, all sides
2

will spend less time on the rhetoric and spend more time on the facts and law and the
results for consumers.
I tell my staff often that it is important for us to get outside the Beltway and hear
directly from consumers. I want to thank you and the participants on tonight's panel for
taking time out of your busy lives to attend tonight's discussion. I look forward to
hearing about what an open Internet means to you.
3

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.