PSHSB seeks comment on LA-RICS request for waiver
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500445 12th St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Released: January 11, 2013
PUBLIC SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON REQUEST
FOR WAIVER BY LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEM JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY TO APPLY FOR 700 MHZ “NARROWBAND
COMMENTS DUE: February 11, 2013
REPLY COMMENTS DUE: February 25, 2013By this Public Notice, the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB) seeks comment
on a waiver request filed by the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Joint
Powers Authority (LA-RICS), to permit LA-RICS and its member public safety entities in the Los
Angeles metropolitan area to apply for licenses for the 700 MHz “narrowband reserve channels” and
integrate those frequencies into the LA-RICS radio system.1
LA-RICS had planned that the voice communications platform of its multi-agency, interoperable
communications system would operate in the 470-512 MHz band (T-Band).2 However, the Middle Class
Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Public Safety Spectrum Act), requires public safety
incumbents, such as LA-RICS, to vacate the T-Band in the future.3 Specifically, Section 6103 of the
Public Safety Spectrum Act requires that the Commission, not later than February 2021: (1) reallocate
public safety spectrum in the 470 – 512 MHz band;4 (2) begin a system of competitive bidding to grant
new initial licenses for such spectrum,5 and (3) relocate public safety users not later than two years after
said competitive bidding is completed.6 Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 6103, LA-RICS
states that it “must deploy a new system […] as its members’ current systems need to be upgraded to
replace aging equipment, provide greater efficiency, add capabilities, and promote interoperability across
1 Request for Waiver of Section 90.531(b)(2) filed by Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System
Joint Powers Authority (Dec. 7, 2012) (Waiver Request).
2 Id. at 3.
3 Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-96, 126 Stat. 156.
4 Id. § 6103(a)(1) citing 47 C.F.R. § 90.303.
5 Id. § 6103(a)(2) citing 47 U.S.C. § 309(j).
6 Id. § 6103(c).
7 Waiver Request at 4-5.
“[A]bsent repeal of Section 6103,” LA RICS states, “the only viable approach is to deploy a
hybrid 470-512 MHz/700 MHz narrowband system.”8 LA-RICS submits that a hybrid approach “would
provide a logical path to operate a full public safety grade communications system in both bands, and
allow for a gradual migration from 470-512 MHz within the time period required by the Act.”9 However,
LA-RICS states that “the hybrid system requires more 700 MHz narrowband channels than are currently
available, either in the interim, while 470-512 MHz is still available, or in the long term if public safety is
forced to relinquish 470-512 MHz as required by current law.”10 LA-RICS therefore requests that all of
the 700 MHz reserve channels (48 6.25 kHz channel pairs) be made available for licensing as part of LA-
RICS’ hybrid system.11
Under Section 90.531(b)(2) of the Commission rules, the narrowband reserve channels are
“undesignated and reserved.”12 LA-RICS states that “[f]ourteen years have now passed without any
further Commission proposals or orders regarding the potential use of the narrowband reserve
channels.”13 “LA-RICS believes that the highest and best use of that spectrum in the Los Angeles area
would be as part of the LA-RICS system, as a means of mitigating the impact of recent legislation
regarding the 470-512 MHz band.”14 Accordingly, LA-RICS requests a waiver pursuant to Section
1.925(b)(3)15 of the Commission’s rules.16
In support of its waiver request, LA-RICS states that “[t]he apparent purpose of the relevant rule
was to reserve certain narrowband channels to address future requirements.”17 LA-RICS argues that it
“has presented just such a requirement.”18 Thus, LA-RICS claims, “continuing to reserve the relevant
channels in the Los Angeles area would be contrary to the original purpose of the rule and the public
8 Id. at 5.
10 Id. at 6.
11 Id. at 7.
12 47 C.F.R. § 90.531(b)(2).
13 Waiver Request at 7. In 2008, the Bureau sought comment on the National Public Safety Telecommunications
Council’s (NPSTC) proposal to designate the narrowband reserve channels “to promote deployment of mobile
trunked infrastructure that can be transported into [an] incident area.” See Petition for Rulemaking of the National
Public Safety Telecommunications Council at 7, RM-11433 (filed Feb. 8, 2008); Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for Rulemaking of the National Public Safety Telecommunications
Council Concerning the 700 MHz Public Safety Narrowband Channels, RM-11433, Public Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 395
(PSHSB 2008). The Bureau has also permitted, on a waiver basis, the use of deployable trunked systems on the 700
MHz interoperability spectrum subject to the outcome of the NPSTC petition (i.e., should the Commission authorize
the use of deployable trunked systems on the reserve spectrum those waiver recipients shall relocate to the reserve
spectrum). See, e.g., State of Colorado, Order, 27 FCC Rcd 6051 (PSHSB 2012). Because the LA-RICS’ waiver
request raises issues relevant to the NPSTC Petition, we are incorporating the waiver request into that proceeding.
14 Waiver Request at 7.
15 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3)(i)-(ii).
16 Waiver Request at 8.
interest.”19 LA-RICS argues that it “is also facing unique and unusual factual circumstances.”20 “Just as
LA-RICS embarked on a major, multi-million dollar project to provide interoperable communications
across the Los Angeles area,” LA-RICS states, “Congress has unexpectedly adopted legislation that will
take away the principal frequency band to be used in the new system.”21 Under such circumstances, LA-
RICS contends, “continuing to hold 700 MHz narrowband spectrum in reserve would be ‘inequitable,
unduly burdensome’ and ‘contrary to the public interest.’”22 Finally, LA-RICS argues that it has “no
reasonable alternative” under current statutory provisions.23
We seek comment on LA-RICS’s Waiver Request and announce the pleading cycle during which
comments and replies may be filed.
This proceeding will be treated as “permit but disclose” for purposes of the Commission’s ex
parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of
this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of
the Commission’s rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.24 Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within
two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex
parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s written comments, memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the
presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or
other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be
found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission
staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed
consistent with rule 1.1206(b). Written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
.pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Parties may file comments on the Waiver Request on or before February 11, 2013. Reply
comments may be filed on or before February 25, 2013.
Please place the rulemaking number, RM-11433, on all filings. Comments may be filed using the
Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). See Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the
24 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and one copy of each
filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-
class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary
must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW, Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries
must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority
Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th
Street, SW, Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities
(braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).
Copies of the Petition and any subsequently filed documents in this matter are also available for
inspection in the Commission’s Reference Information Center:
445 12th Street, S.W., CY-Level
Washington, D.C. 20554
For further information, contact: John A. Evanoff. Esq., Policy and Licensing Division, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at (202) 418-0848 or John.Evanoff@fcc.gov.
Action by the Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
– FCC –
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.