Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

Securus Stay Order

Download Options

Released: January 13, 2014
USCA Case #13-1280 Document #1474764 Filed: 01/13/2014 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 13-1280

September Term, 2013

FCC-78FR67956

Filed On:

January 13, 2014
Securus Technologies, Inc.,
Petitioner
v.
Federal Communications Commission and
United States of America,
Respondents
------------------------------
Consolidated with 13-1281, 13-1291, 13-1300

BEFORE

:
Henderson, Brown,* and Srinivasan, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motions for stay, the oppositions thereto, and the
replies, it is

ORDERED

that the motions for stay be granted in part and denied in part. The
following provisions of the Federal Communications Commission’s “Report and Order
and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,” FCC 13-113 (Sept. 26, 2013), are stayed
pending the court’s resolution of these petitions for review: 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.6010,
64.6020, and 64.6060. With respect to these provisions, petitioners have satisfied the
stringent requirements for a stay pending court review. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def.
Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal
Procedures 33 (2013). It is
Circuit Jud
*
ge Brown would grant a stay of the entire rule.

USCA Case #13-1280 Document #1474764 Filed: 01/13/2014 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 13-1280

September Term, 2013

FURTHER ORDERED

, on the court’s own motion, that the parties submit
proposed formats for the briefing of these cases within 30 days of the date of this order.
The parties are strongly urged to submit a joint proposal and are reminded that the
court looks with extreme disfavor on repetitious submissions and will, where
appropriate, require a joint brief of aligned parties with total words not to exceed the
standard allotment for a single brief. Whether the parties are aligned or have disparate
interests, they must provide detailed justifications for any request to file separate briefs
or to exceed in the aggregate the standard word allotment. Requests to exceed the
standard word allotment must specify the word allotment necessary for each issue.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY:
/s/
Timothy A. Ralls
Deputy Clerk/LD
Page 2

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.