Turner Broadcasting System Inc. Dismissal
Washington, D.C. 20554
DA 13-1465June 28, 2013
Ms. Junan Gibson
Turner Broadcasting System Inc.
One CNN Center
Atlanta, GA 30303
Call Sign: E130013
File No.: SES-LIC-20130116-00055
Dear Ms. Gibson:
On January 16, 2013, Turner Broadcasting System Inc. (Turner Broadcasting) filed the above-
captioned application for a fixed earth station in Atlanta, GA, to communicate with ALSAT
designated satellites in the 3700-4200 MHz (space to Earth) and 5925-6425 MHz (Earth to space)
frequency bands using a 9.1 meter antenna, model ViaSat 8009A. For the reasons stated below,
we dismiss the application as defective without prejudice to re-filing.1
Section 25.112 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25.112, requires the Commission to return,
as unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, that
contains internal inconsistencies, or that does not substantially comply with the Commission's
rules. For the reasons explained below, we dismiss the application without prejudice to refilling.1
Only earth stations that meet routine licensing criteria may be granted ALSAT as a point
of communication.2 In item E48 of Schedule B to FCC Form 312, Turner Broadcasting
lists the maximum Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (eirp) level per carrier as 83.50
dBW for the analog emission designator 36M0F3F. Consequently, the input power at the
antenna flange would be 29.7 dBW,3 a level that exceeds the 26.5 dBW input power limit
for routine analog video modulation specified in Section 25.211(d)(1) of the
If Turner Broadcasting re-files an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of
supplying the corrected information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1111(d).
2 See, e.g. Amendment of the Commission's Regulatory Policies to Allow Non-U.S. Licensed Space
Stations to Provide Domestic and International Satellite Service in the United States, Order on
Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 7207 (para. 13) (1999) (DISCO II Order) (re-iterating that routine earth
stations in the C- and Ku-band that is, earth stations that operate consistently with the technical
requirements of Part 25 of the Commission's rules are typically licensed to communicate with all U.S.
licensed satellites operating in these bands). See also Telesat Canada, Petition for Declaratory Ruling For
Inclusion of ANIK F1 on the Permitted Space Station List, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 24828 (para. 15) (2000);
Telesat Canada, Petition for Declaratory Ruling For Inclusion of ANIK F1 on the Permitted Space Station
List, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 16365 (para.7) (2001).
Proposed eirp level (83.5 dBW) minus antenna transmit gain (53.8 dBi) equals 29.7 dBW.
Federal Communications Commission DA 13-1465Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25.211 (d)(1). Analog transmissions in the Fixed-
Satellite Service proposing to use power into the antenna in excess of that specified in
Section 25.211(d) cannot be routinely licensed and must comply with the procedures set
forth in Section 25.220 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25.211 and 25.220.
Turner Broadcasting does not, however, provide the certification required by Section
25.220 (d)(1)(i) through (d)(1)(iv) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25. 220
(d)(1)(i) through (d)(1)(iv) and its application is therefore incomplete.
Turner Broadcasting does not identify specific satellites as points of communication, as
required by Section 25.130(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 25. 130(a)(1).
In item E56 of Schedule B to FCC Form 312, Turner Broadcasting provides antenna
elevation angles and azimuth angles that do not match our calculations based on the earth
station's latitude and longitude. Therefore, Turner Broadcasting must supply, if it re-files
for an authorization, appropriate values for the antenna elevation angle and earth station
azimuth angle for which it intends to communicate.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R.
0.261, we dismiss the application, without prejudice to re-filing.
Paul E. Blais
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Mintz, Levin, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
701 Pennsylvania, Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.