WCB Conditionally Grants VT Request to Opt Out of Duplicates Database
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554In the Matter of
Lifeline and Link Up Reform and
WC Docket No. 11-42
Adopted: February 15, 2013
Released: February 15, 2013By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau:
INTRODUCTION1. In this Order, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) conditionally grants the certification
of the Vermont Department of Public Service (VDPS) to opt out of the National Lifeline Accountability
Database (national database).1 The VDPS has demonstrated that, subject to the conditions described
below, its system is comprehensive and at least as robust as the processes adopted by the Commission in
the Lifeline Reform Order, and is capable of detecting and eliminating duplicative support.2
BACKGROUND2. In the Lifeline Reform Order, the Commission established the national database to detect and
eliminate duplicative Lifeline support provided to individuals and households, and imposed specific
requirements on eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs), such as the requirement to query the
database prior to signing up a subscriber to determine if that subscriber or a member of that subscriber’s
household is already receiving Lifeline support from another ETC.3 The Commission, however,
recognized that states may have their own systems for eliminating duplicative Lifeline support, and
established a process through which states could file a request seeking to “opt out” of the national
1 See Petition and Certification of the Vermont Department of Public Service to Opt Out of the National Lifeline
Database and Petition for Waiver of § 54.410, Vermont Department of Public Service Commission, WC Docket No.
11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 19, 2012); Amendment to the Petition and Certification of the
Vermont Department of Public Service to Opt Out of the National Lifeline Database, Vermont Department of Public
Service, WC Docket No. 11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 4, 2013) (Amendment); Letter of Tamara
Pariseau, VDPS, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, WC Docket No. 11-42 (filed Feb. 12, 2013) (Vermont Letter).
2 See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization et al., WC Docket Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45,
Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 27 FCC Rcd 6656, 6752, para. 221 (2012) (Lifeline
3 See id. at 6734-55, paras. 179-225; 47 C.F.R. § 54.404.
4 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6752, para. 221; 47 C.F.R. § 54.404(a).
Federal Communications Commission
DA 13-2303. On October 11, 2012, the Bureau released a public notice providing guidance to states
regarding the opt out process.5 To opt out, the state’s system must be comprehensive and at least as
robust as the processes adopted by the Commission in the Lifeline Reform Order.6 In states where the
system meets this standard and the state successfully exercises its opt out rights, ETCs operating in that
state must comply with the state requirements for interfacing with the state database and will be relieved
of any obligation to comply with requirements regarding the national database.7
4. In its public notice, the Bureau also provided a waiver of the deadline by which states must
file their opt out certification, until December 1, 2012.8 Vermont and four other states filed their opt out
certifications on or before December 1, 2012, and the Bureau sought comment on the certifications.9 The
Bureau must act on the certifications within 90 days of being filed, or they will be granted
5. The VDPS filed its certification on November 19, 2012, and supplemented its certification on
February 4, 2013 and again on February 12, 2013.11 The VDPS explains that to enroll in the Lifeline
program in Vermont, subscribers submit Lifeline applications to the Vermont Department of Children and
Families (VDCF).12 ETCs are not permitted to submit certifications on behalf of subscribers.13 The
VDCF performs a check of state systems to determine if the prospective subscriber (1) is receiving a
benefit that qualifies the subscriber for Lifeline; and (2) is already receiving a Lifeline benefit.14 The
VDCF performs this check within one business day of receiving the application.15 ETCs can proactively
5 Wireline Competition Bureau Clarifies Minimum Requirements for States Seeking To Opt Out Of The National
Lifeline Accountability Database, WC Docket No. 11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45, Public Notice, 27 FCC Rcd
12321 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2012) (Guidance PN).
6 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6737-46, 6747-52, paras. 188-208, 212-20. An opt out request will
only be granted when a state demonstrates it has systems that cover all ETCs operating in the state and all
subscribers of those ETCs. The opt out request must itemize with particularity the functions of its system that
correspond to the federal processes adopted in the Lifeline Reform Order. See id. at 6752, para. 221; Guidance PN,
27 FCC Rcd at 12322.
7 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6752, para. 221.
8 See Guidance PN, 27 FCC Rcd at 12321-22.
9 See Petition of the State of California Public Utilities Commission and the People of the State of California to Opt
Out of National Lifeline Accountability Database, WC Docket Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Dec. 3,
2012); Petition of the Puerto Rico Telecommunications Board to Opt Out of the National Lifeline Accountability
Database, WC Docket Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 30, 2012); Petition and Certification of
the Public Utility Commission of Oregon to Opt-Out of the National Lifeline Database, WC Docket Nos. 11-42 et
al., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 30, 2012); Amendment to the Petition To Opt-Out of the National Database
Pursuant to CFR 47 § 54.404(a) by the Public Utility Commission of Texas, WC Docket Nos. 11-42 et al., CC
Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 16, 2012) (amending Petition To Opt-Out of the National Database Pursuant to CFR
47 § 54.404(a) by the Public Utility Commission of Texas; WC Docket Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45
(filed Sept. 16, 2012)); see also Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on State Certifications to Opt-Out of
the National Lifeline Accountability Database, WC Docket Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Docket No. 96-45, Public Notice,
27 FCC Rcd 15274 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2012).
10 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6752, para. 221.
11 See supra n.1.
12 See Amendment at 2.
13 See id. at 5.
14 See id.
15 See id.
Federal Communications Commission
DA 13-230contact the VDCF thereafter to determine if the subscriber’s application has been accepted or rejected.16
However, ETCs are not permitted to interact directly with the VDCF system due to state privacy
restrictions.17 If the ETC does not proactively contact the VDCF regarding a subscriber’s enrollment
status, ETCs will learn prospective subscribers’ enrollment status from a monthly VDCF report.18 In
addition, on a monthly basis, the VDCF and ETCs exchange information so that any additions,
disconnections, account, name or address changes are recorded on the ETCs’ and the state’s systems.19
While the system has not yet received Lifeline enrollment applications from prospective subscribers of
prepaid wireless providers, the VDPS explains that two prepaid wireless providers have recently been
designated as ETCs by the state, and there is an additional pre-paid wireless designation application
pending.20 The VDPS states that the Vermont system has the capacity to handle the applications from
subscribers of such providers, and that it has signed memorandums of understanding with both providers
to utilize the Vermont system.21
DISCUSSION6. The Bureau finds that, subject to the conditions explained below, the VDPS has demonstrated
that its system is comprehensive and at least as robust as the system adopted by the Commission, and is
capable of detecting and eliminating duplicative support. The Commission appreciates the efforts of
states that have moved proactively against waste by implementing a system to check for subscriber
eligibility and duplicative support. 22 We find that the public interest would be served by allowing
Vermont to continue these efforts through its state-specific system.
7. Despite the inability of Vermont’s system to immediately respond to an ETC query as to
whether a prospective subscriber is already receiving Lifeline service, we do not find that this limitation
prevents the Vermont system from being as “robust” as the national system.23 As an initial matter, state
privacy restrictions make it infeasible for Vermont to create a process that would permit ETCs to query
the Vermont system for duplicates and receive an immediate response.24 Moreover, we do not expect this
one difference in capability to make the system any less able to detect and eliminate duplicative Lifeline
support. We also note that the Vermont system has the ability to check for subscriber eligibility.25 The
VDPS states that, absent the approval of its opt out certification, it would no longer be able to perform
this eligibility function.26 As the Commission explained in the Lifeline Reform Order, eligibility
16 See id.
17 See id. at 8 (no ETC has direct access to the state databases); Vermont Letter (explaining privacy restrictions).
18 See Amendment at 4.
19 See id. at 3.
20 See id.
21 See id. at 3-4.
22 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6752, para. 221.
23 In the Lifeline Reform Order, the Commission concluded that the national database “must be capable of providing
verification upon query from an eligible querying party whether a prospective subscriber is currently receiving
Lifeline support.” Id. at 6741-42, para. 199 (emphasis added). This capability allows “ETCs [to be able] to
determine if a prospective subscriber is already receiving a Lifeline benefit at the time the prospective subscriber
requests service or seeks a Lifeline benefit from that ETC.” Id.; see also Guidance PN, 27 FCC Rcd at 12322
(requiring opt out requests to demonstrate that a state’s system includes a means “to query the system prior to
enrolling the subscriber” and “has a means of verifying a subscriber’s identity at the time a system query is made”).
24 See Vermont Letter.
25 See Amendment at 9.
26 See id. at 8.
Federal Communications Commission
DA 13-230databases provide substantial benefits to both consumers and ETCs.27 Under these circumstances, we find
that, subject to the conditions described below, Vermont has demonstrated that its system is
comprehensive and at as least as robust as the national system.
8. The Bureau is concerned, however, that ETCs in Vermont may have to wait for a month for
notice from the VDCF that a prospective subscriber has been successfully enrolled in Lifeline or rejected
due to duplicative support.28 This substantial delay may cause administrative problems for ETCs and
prospective subscribers. Although ETCs may contact the VDCF to determine the status of a subscriber’s
application one business day after the VDCF receives the application, the VDPS has not adequately
demonstrated that this procedure is capable of handling large volumes. Therefore, subscribers may not
know for up to a month after their applications whether they can receive Lifeline phone service. We
conclude that, for Vermont’s system to be as robust as the national database, it must be capable of
affirmatively notifying ETCs of whether a subscriber’s Lifeline application has been accepted, or rejected
due to duplicative support within five business days of the VDCF receiving the prospective subscriber’s
9. Therefore, the Bureau conditions approval of the VDPS national database opt out certification
on the establishment of a means of affirmatively providing ETCs in Vermont with electronic notice of
whether a prospective subscriber has been accepted, or rejected due to duplicative support, within five
business days of the VDCF receiving the prospective subscriber’s Lifeline application.29 The VDPS must
file with the Bureau a description of this process by June 1, 2013, have the process in place by August 1,
2013, and confirm in writing to the Bureau by August 10, 2013 that the process is in place and
operational. If the VDPS does not comply with these conditions, its certification will be deemed denied
without any further action by the Bureau.
ORDERING CLAUSES10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91,
0.291, and 54.404 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.404, and in paragraph 221 of
FCC 12-11, the certification filed by the Vermont Department of Public Service IS CONDITIONALLY
GRANTED as described above.
11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules,
47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Julie A. Veach
Wireline Competition Bureau
27 See Lifeline Reform Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 6753, para. 223.
28 See Amendment at 4.
29 We note that the VDCF makes a determination of whether the applicant is already receiving support from another
ETC within one business day of receiving a Lifeline application. See id. at 5. We therefore encourage the VDPS to
establish a process to provide notice to ETCs of duplicative support in less than five business days after the VDCF
receives an application.
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.