Skip Navigation

Federal Communications Commission

English Display Options

Commission Document

WCB Requests Further Information on Sandwich Isles Waiver Petition

Download Options

Released: June 6, 2012

REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554




DA 12-893

June 6, 2012

Mr. Albert S.N. Hee
President
Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc.
1003 Bishop Street, 27th Floor
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Re: Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.302 of the
Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 10-90 and WT Docket No. 10-208


Dear Mr. Hee:
The Wireline Competition Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission is
continuing to evaluate the petition of the Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. (Sandwich Isles)
for waiver of section 54.302 of the Commission's rules, which establishes a total limit on high-
cost universal service support of $250 per line per month.1 In the USF/ICC Transformation
Order
, the Commission established the $250 per line per month limit as part of its fiscally
responsible reform of the universal service fund and mandated that the limit be phased in over
three years. The Commission permitted affected carriers to seek a waiver of that restriction by
providing specific information in its petition and also required any requesting carrier to provide
additional information as requested by staff.2
The Bureau has reviewed the information Sandwich Isles provided with its petition, the
record received in response to the petition,3 and Sandwich Isles’ response to the Bureau’s March
13, 2012 letter seeking additional information.4 Together, these materials raise additional
questions regarding Sandwich Isles’ projected revenues and expenses.


1 Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.302 of the Commission's Rules,
WC Docket No. 10-90 and WT Docket No. 10-208 (filed Dec. 30, 2011); see also Connect America Fund
et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 26 FCC
Rcd 17663 (2011) (USF/ICC Transformation Order); 47 C.F.R. § 54.302.
2 USF/ICC Transformation Order, 26 FCC Rcd at 17842, para. 543.
3 See Comments of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc., WC Docket No. 10-90 and WT Docket No. 10-208 (filed Feb.
9, 2012); Comments of US Telecom, WC Docket No. 10-90 and WT Docket No. 10-208 (filed Feb. 9,
2012).
4 See Letter from Sharon E. Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, to Albert N. Hee, President, Sandwich Isles Telecommunications, Inc., WC Docket No. 10-90
and WT Docket No. 10-208 (Mar. 13, 2012); Letter from Frederick M. Joyce, Counsel for Sandwich Isles

REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

In particular, the overwhelming majority of Sandwich Isles’ expenses – many millions of
dollars – consist of significant payments to a number of affiliated companies, including
ClearCom, Waimana, [REDACTED], and Paniolo,5 each of which appears to be owned and/or
operated by Mr. Hee, CEO of Sandwich Isles, or his family members. In its initial waiver filing
and in its submissions since, Sandwich Isles has failed to be forthcoming regarding its affiliates,
the finances of these affiliates, the basis of Sandwich Isles’ payments to these affiliates, and the
details of Sandwich Isles’ agreements with these companies. As a result, the Bureau still lacks
basic information necessary to evaluate these affiliate transactions. The Bureau reminds
Sandwich Isles that, in demonstrating whether a waiver is warranted, the burden of proof rests
with the petitioner.6 Accordingly, it is incumbent on Sandwich Isles to be as forthcoming as
possible so that the Bureau has necessary and complete information before it when acting on the
waiver petition.
Moreover, the information available to us raises significant questions about whether
Sandwich Isles could be obtaining the services it receives from its affiliates at much lower rates
from unaffiliated sources. These affiliate payments also appear to reflect very significant and
unexplained corporate expenses, and raise concerns that Sandwich Isles may be using universal
service funds to cross-subsidize competitive services outside of its service territory.
Accordingly, the Bureau requests additional information related to these issues. This
additional information is necessary for the Bureau to complete its analysis of whether there is
good cause to grant the requested waiver.
Please provide full and complete responses to the following questions:
1. In its response to the Bureau letter, Sandwich Isles projects revenues and operating expenses
for the period 2012 through 2016. Please detail the major components of Sandwich Isles’
projected revenues and operating expenses for each of the projected years.
a. Please separately identify projected revenue, if any, for HCLS, ICLS, Connect
America Fund ICC/CAF Recovery, Access Recovery Charges, intercarrier
compensation showing separately cost recovery from NECA pools related to the
Paniolo network and other cost recovery from NECA pools, revenues from
leasing the Paniolo cable to other users, and any other major components of
projected revenues. Please also provide projected customer revenues for each
year by type of service.
b. Please separately identify detailed projected operating expenses in each of the
following expense categories, including but not limited to:




Communications to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 10-90 (filed Apr. 16, 2012) (Apr.
16 Response).
5 See Streamlined Submarine Cable Landing License Applications Accepted for Filing, Report No. SCL-
00083S, Public Notice (rel. March 25, 2009) (noting that control of Paniolo was transferred to Blue Ivory
on March 31, 2008 and that “Blue Ivory is wholly owned by and controlled by Blue Ivory Hawaii Corp.”,
which “is held equally by three private trusts, the Adrianne H.R. Hee Irrevocable Trust, the Breanne E.R.
Hee Irrevocable Trust, and the Charlton E.R. Hee Irrevocable Trust.”).
6 Tucson Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 452 F.2d 1380, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1971).
2

REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

i. Plant specific
1. Paniolo lease expense7
2. Payments to each affiliate of Sandwich Isles
3. Payments to non-affiliates
ii. Plant Non-specific
1. Payments to each affiliate of Sandwich Isles
2. Payments to non-affiliates
iii. Corporate operations
1. Waimana management fee
2. [REDACTED]
3. Payments to ClearCom, if any
4. Payroll/Labor
5. Other
2.
Payments to [REDACTED] Insurance Company, [REDACTED] from 2008 to 2011.
Provide details for all insurance policies purchased [REDACTED] for those years, including
type of insurance and premiums. Please provide copies of all insurance contracts and
agreements [REDACTED]. Please provide information regarding any activities to seek
insurance from other companies since 2008, including the name of the company, type of
insurance and the quoted premium.
3. During 2010, Sandwich Isles [REDACTED] its affiliate ClearCom, which was recorded as
Corporate Operations Expense. Provide details on the nature and purpose of this expense. In
addition, please provide copies of all contracts or agreements, if any, between Sandwich Isles
and ClearCom.
4. Provide the name, position, and annual compensation of the ten highest paid employees of
ClearCom and [REDACTED] for 2009, 2010, and 2011. In addition to salary, include as
part of compensation any benefits, dividends, increases in equity, sales of equity, or any other
non-salary forms of compensation.
5. Provide details on the ownership of Paniolo, including the names of all owners, the
percentage ownership of each, and the relationship to the owner of Sandwich Isles. In 2009,
in addition to lease payments, Sandwich Isles paid [REDACTED] to the Paniolo Network.
Please specify the reason for [REDACTED], the financial justification for the
[REDACTED], the extent to which the [REDACTED] are useful to any other entity, and the
contractual potential for recovery of the [REDACTED] in the event of a change in the
contract between Sandwich Isles and Paniolo. Please provide copies of all contracts and
agreements between Sandwich Isles and Paniolo.


7 We note that Sandwich Isles projects payments from Sandwich Isles to Paniolo for the years 2012 to 2016
of approximately [REDACTED] annually for expenses found by the Bureau not to be "used or useful" for
provision of service to the Hawaiian homelands. See Apr. 16 Response at 14; Sandwich Isles
Communications, Inc., Petition for Declaratory Ruling
, WC Docket No. 09-133, Declaratory Ruling, 25
FCC 13647, 13650, para. 9 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2010).
3

REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

6. Please provide detailed financial statements for Waimana, ClearCom, and [REDACTED] for
the years 2007 through 2011. Indicate any other entities for whom Waimana and ClearCom
provide management services and, in the cases of any individuals who work on more than
one project, the percentage of time and expense allocated between Sandwich Isles and other
projects. In addition, provide copies of the employment agreements of the top four
executives of Waimana and each of its affiliates. Please quantify the percentage of
compensation for each of these executives that were allocated to or otherwise recovered from
Sandwich Isles in 2009, 2010, and 2011.
7. In its response to the Bureau letter, Sandwich Isles projected approximately [REDACTED]
additional average capital expenditure (capex) each year for the years 2012 through 2016.
Please provide the number of new voice customers and the number of new broadband
customers for each of the past three calendar years. Please detail the major components of
Sandwich Isles’ additional projected capex for each of the projected years. Please separately
identify additional projected capex in each of the following categories:
a. Transport: (a) capex, if any, associated with the Paniolo network, (b) capex, if
any, associated with the water mains, and (c) other transport-related capex, if
any;
b. Loop: (a) capex, if any, associated with the addition of new customers in the
study area, (b) capex, if any, associated with the maintenance of loops for the
existing customers in the study area, and (c) other loop-related capex, if any;
c. Other, if any.
8. Sandwich Isles uses abandoned water mains from ClearCom, Inc., which leases the
abandoned water mains from the Board of Water Supply for the City and County of
Honolulu.8 Please quantify the amount of abandoned water mains utilized in ClearCom’s
network (excluding the usage in Sandwich Isles’ network) in terms of miles used, customers
served, and revenue earned. Please provide copies of any agreements between Sandwich
Isles and ClearCom and the lease agreement between the Board of Water Supply and
ClearCom for the abandoned water mains.
9. Sandwich Isles did not list Sandwich Isles Wireless as an affiliate in either its initial petition
or in its response to the Bureau’s March 13, 2012 letter. Please provide information about the
ownership of Sandwich Isles Wireless. In addition, please provide information on the nature
of relationship, payments, and investments (if any) for the periods 2009 through 2012 (year-
to-date) between Sandwich Isles Communications and Sandwich Isles Wireless. In addition,
please provide documentation showing how Sandwich Isles Wireless will have sufficient
funds to meet its 5-year build-out obligations to the Hawaiian Public Utilities Commission


8 HB 2267, HD 1, Relating to Issues of Special Purpose Revenue Bonds to Assist ClearCom, Inc., in the
Development of Broadband Infrastructure in Hawaii, Session 2012 (Feb. 23, 2012) (statement of Albert S.N.
Hee, President of ClearCom, Inc. to the House Committee on Finance, Hawaii State Legislature); available at
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2012/Testimony/HB2267_HD1_TESTIMONY_FIN_02-23-
12_3_.PDF.
SB 2236, HD 1 Relating to Information Technology, Session 2012 (Mar. 28, 2012) (statement of Ed Pukini,
Regional Vice President, Mid-State Consultants to the House Committee on Finance, Hawaii State
Legislature), available at
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2012/Testimony/SB2236_HD1_TESTIMONY_FIN_03-28-12_1_.PDF
4

REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

without federal high-cost universal service support. Please provide documentation showing
Sandwich Isles Wireless’s current and planned access to spectrum, including any contracts
with other providers to resell their service.
10. We note that Sandwich Isles has stated that it is “subject to competition from multiple mobile
wireless carriers and to digital voice service provided by a cable company.”9 Please provide
a list of Sandwich Isles’ competitors (both wireline and wireless) and indicate to what extent
those competitors overlap Sandwich Isles’ study area.
If Sandwich Isles believes that any information or documents responsive to this letter be
treated in a confidential manner, it may file the information in accordance with the Bureau’s
Protective Order in this proceeding.10
If you have any questions please call Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879.
Sincerely,
Sharon E. Gillett
Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
cc: Frederick M. Joyce
Counsel for Sandwich Isles
Venable, LLP


9 Letter from Frederick M. Joyce, Counsel for Sandwich Isles Communications to Patricia Quartey, FCC
(dated Jan. 23, 2012).
10 Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Protective Order, 25 FCC Rcd 13160
(Wireline Comp. Bur. 2010).
5

Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.

close
FCC

You are leaving the FCC website

You are about to leave the FCC website and visit a third-party, non-governmental website that the FCC does not maintain or control. The FCC does not endorse any product or service, and is not responsible for, nor can it guarantee the validity or timeliness of the content on the page you are about to visit. Additionally, the privacy policies of this third-party page may differ from those of the FCC.