WTB Dismisses Competing Application
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500445 12th St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Released: April 10, 2014
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU DISMISSES COMPETING APPLICATION
WT Docket No. 10-112
By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) dismisses a mutually
exclusive (i.e., competing) application filed by Green Flag Wireless, LLC (Green Flag), against a 2.3
GHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS) authorization now held by AT&T Mobility Spectrum
LLC, call sign KNLB243.1
BackgroundIn 2007, the Competing Applicants (identified in note 1) filed applications against most WCS
applications for license renewal.2 In May 2010, the Commission commenced a rulemaking to adopt
consistent requirements for the renewal of Wireless Radio Services licenses, including the 2.3 GHz WCS
band.3 The Commission reviewed the dispute between the WCS licensees and the Competing
Applicants,4 and directed the Bureau to grant the renewal applications, on a conditional basis, subject to
the outcome of the rulemaking.5 The Commission stated that if it were to adopt the rules and policies
proposed in the rulemaking, it would dismiss the Competing Applications.6 The rulemaking is pending.
1 ULS File No. 0003090867. See Request to Withdraw Pleadings, Petitions & Filings, filed by Green Flag, CWC
License Holding, Inc. (CWC), Corr Investments I, LLC (Corr, the successor-in-interest to CWC), James McCotter
(McCotter) and AT&T, Inc., on behalf of AT&T Mobility Spectrum LLC, WT Docket 10-112 (filed June 13, 2013)
(Dismissal Request). We collectively refer to Corr, CWC, Green Flag, and McCotter as the Competing Applicants
and to AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility as AT&T.
2 ULS File Nos. 0003113283 et al.
3 Amendment of Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 90, 95, and 101 To Establish Uniform License Renewal, Discontinuance
of Operation, and Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation Rules and Policies for Certain Wireless
Radio Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 25 FCC Rcd 6996 (2010).
4 Id. at 7035-38 ¶¶106-111.
5 Id. at 7039 ¶113.
6 Id. at 7033-34 ¶100.
On August 28, 2012, the Bureau found that a waiver of Section 1.935 of the Commission’s rules,
which limits the consideration that parties may exchange to resolve mutually exclusive applications,
would serve the public interest by helping resolve the Competing Applications.7
On October 15, 2012, the Bureau approved a Settlement Agreement to resolve the Competing
Applications.8 The Bureau found that approval of the agreement would serve the public interest by
helping eliminate uncertainty regarding the WCS band, thereby removing an impediment to the
significant investment needed to deploy next-generation services in the band.9 The Bureau dismissed all
Competing Applications and related filings regarding WCS authorizations then held by AT&T.
The Bureau also determined that its approval of the Settlement Agreement would extend to
resolution of any Competing Applications that were filed in 2007 against WCS authorizations that AT&T
may subsequently acquire.10 On April 19, 2013, the Commission consented to AT&T’s acquisition of
WCS license KNLB243 held by NTELOS.11 The parties consummated that transaction on June 5,
Review and Approval of the Dismissal Request
We review the Dismissal Request under Section 1.935 of the Commission’s rules. Section 1.935
requires parties that enter into an agreement to resolve mutually exclusive applications by withdrawing or
seeking dismissal of one or more applications to first obtain Commission approval. Section 1.935
requires moving parties to submit a copy of any related written agreement (here, the Settlement
Agreement, which the Bureau approved previously), and any related request for approval of the
withdrawal or dismissal (here, the Dismissal Request).
As required by the Bureau’s WCS Settlement Public Notice, AT&T and the Competing
Applicants: (1) state that they have not materially amended, or waived, any substantive provision of the
Settlement Agreement; (2) have enumerated each Competing Application to be dismissed; and (3) have
confirmed that they will not exchange any financial consideration for dismissal of the Competing
Application until the Bureau dismisses such application and related filings with prejudice.13 We have
reviewed the Dismissal Request and find that our approval will serve the public interest by removing
7 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Grants Limited Waiver To Facilitate Resolution of Competing Renewal
Applications, Public Notice, DA 12-1407, 27 FCC Rcd 10248 (WTB 2012) (WCS Settlement Public Notice).
8 The Settlement Agreement is by and among the Competing Applicants and BellSouth Mobile Data, Inc., New
Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, and SBC Telecom, Inc. (together with AT&T Inc., AT&T). The Settlement
Agreement is attached to the Joint Ex Parte Request for Resolution of Competing Applications, WT Docket 10-112
(filed Aug. 31, 2012).
11 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Assignment of License Authorization Applications, Transfer of Control of
Licensee Applications, De Facto Transfer Lease Applications and Spectrum Manager Lease Notifications,
Designated Entity Reportable Eligibility Event Applications, and Designated Entity Annual Reports Action, Public
Notice, Report No. 8636, at 11 (Apr. 24, 2013).
12 ULS File No. 0005809573.
13 See Dismissal Request.
uncertainty regarding WCS license KNLB243, and thereby promote intensive use of the spectrum.
Accordingly, we hereby grant the Dismissal Request and dismiss, with prejudice and effective
immediately, the Competing Application and related filings.
For further information, please contact Richard Arsenault, Chief Counsel, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0920 or Richard.Arsenault@fcc.gov.
Action by the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, taken pursuant to
Sections 1, 308, and 309 of the Communications Act, and Sections 0.331, 1.3, and 1.935 of the
14 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 308, and 309; 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.331, 1.3, and 1.935.
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.