WTB seeks comment on Key Bridge's Proposal
Federal Communications Commission
News Media Information 202 / 418-0500445 12th St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Released: November 27, 2013
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON
KEY BRIDGE GLOBAL LLC PROPOSAL TO BE DESIGNATED AS A71-76 GHZ, 81-86 GHZ AND 92-95 GHZ BANDS DATABASE MANAGER
WT Docket No. 13-291
Comment Date: December 12, 2013
Reply Date: December 23, 2013The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) invites comment on Key Bridge Global LLC’s
(Key Bridge’s) proposal to be designated as a database manager for link registrations by licensees in the
71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and 92-95 GHz bands.1
Background. The 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and 92-95 GHz (71-95 GHz) bands are allocated to
both Federal Government and non-Federal Government users on a co-primary basis, except the 94.0-94.1
GHz portion, which is allocated for Federal Government use on a primary basis.2 The Commission issues
non-exclusive, nationwide licenses for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and 92-95 GHz bands that serve as a
prerequisite for registering point-to-point links in private databases developed and managed by WTB-
designated database managers (DMs).3
A licensee is not authorized to operate a link under its nationwide license until the link is both
(1) coordinated with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) with
respect to Federal Government operations4 and (2) registered as an approved link. Interference protection
1 Key Bridge Global LLC Proposal to Develop and Manage an Independent Database of Site Registrations by
Licensees in the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands (filed May 20, 2013) (Key Bridge Proposal).
Although captioned under WT Docket No. 02-146, see infra note 3, we are opening a new docket.
2 See 47 C.F.R. § 2.106.
3 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.1501-1527 (subpart Q - Service and Technical Rules for the 70/80/90 GHz Bands). See also
Allocations and Service Rules for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-146,
Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 23318 (2003) (Report and Order), recon. granted in part in Memorandum Opinion
and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 4889 (2005) (MO&O). In the Report and Order, the Commission adopted rules for both
unlicensed (Part 15) and licensed (Part 101) use of portions of these bands; this public notice concerns licensed use
of the bands, which involves all of the bands except for 100 megahertz of spectrum at 94.0-94.1 GHz. For
convenience only, we refer to the licensed spectrum herein as “the bands” or “the 71-95 GHz bands”; such
references do not include 94.0-94.1 GHz.
4 47 C.F.R. § 101.1523(b)(1). NTIA developed an automated coordination mechanism that allows non-Federal users
and DMs to use an Internet site to determine whether a given non-Federal link has any potential conflict with
Federal Government users. See generally Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 23342-43 ¶ 57-60.
among non-Federal Government links is determined by the date/time of individual link registration in the
When the Commission adopted this hybrid licensing approach in 2003, it “reserve[d] the
discretion to designate one or more third-party database managers to maintain a repository for the non-
Federal Government links.”6 In March 2004, WTB issued a public notice listing the Commission’s
requirements, soliciting DM proposals, and inviting public comment on any proposals filed.7 In
September 2004, WTB designated three DMs to jointly develop and manage 71-95 GHz link registration
databases.8 WTB reserved the right to designate new database managers or change the current
designations.9 In December 2004, each DM and WTB executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
setting forth its duties and the limits on its authority and renewal MoUs were executed in 2009.10
Key Bridge Proposal. Key Bridge seeks to be designated as a 71-95 GHz band database
manager.11 Recognizing that the original filing deadline for DM proposals was in 2004, Key Bridge notes
that WTB decided to designate more than one DM and “reserve[d] the discretion to designate additional
managers.”12 Alternatively, Key Bridge requests a waiver of the 2004 deadline.13 Key Bridge provides
information on its background, software and database experience (in particular, its experience developing
databases, particularly its TV White Space System), and other experience as evidence of its capacity to
operate a registration system and database in the 71-95 GHz bands.14 More specifically, Key Bridge
avers that its Petition addresses each of the requirements for DM proposals listed in the 2004 Public
5 As part of registering a link, licensees must provide an electronic copy of an interference analysis to the database
manager. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.1523(b)(2).
6 Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 23339-40 ¶ 49. As to whether to designate more than one DM, the Commission
expected WTB, under delegated authority, to consider the benefits of competition during the selection process, id. at
23340-41 ¶ 51, and to issue public notices implementing the details of licensing and registration, id. at 23340-41,
23343 ¶¶ 51, 59; see also 47 C.F.R. § 101.1523(b).
7 See Allocations and Service Rules for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-146,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Opens Filing Window for Proposals to Develop and Manage Independent
Database of Site Registrations by Licensees in the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands, Public Notice,
19 FCC Rcd 4597, 4598 (WTB BD 2004) (2004 Public Notice).
8 See Allocations and Service Rules for the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-146,
Order, 19 FCC Rcd 20524 (WTB BD 2004) (2004 Order). The Commission had envisioned a “single, shared
database” if more than one database manager is selected but the three entities that submitted proposals jointly
indicated that their separate databases would be linked through coordinated communications to form a unified link
registration system. After setting certain requirements, WTB concluded that a unified link registration system serves
the same purpose as a single, shared database. See id. at 20526-27 ¶¶ 7-9.
9 See 2004 Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 20524 ¶ 1 (“[a]lthough we are designating three database managers at this time,
we reserve the discretion to designate additional managers or change the current designations at a later date if
circumstances indicate that such action is warranted.”), 20526-27 ¶ 7 (“we conclude that it is appropriate to
designate more than one database manager, at least initially. We will continue to have the discretion to revisit this
issue in the future if experience suggests such a course is prudent.”).
10 The Commission anticipated written agreements between the Commission and database managers. See Report
and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 23340-41 ¶ 51. See also Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Broadband Division
Announces Renewal of Database Managers for Management of the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz Bands,
Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14433 (WTB BD 2009).
11 See, e.g., Key Bridge Proposal at 1, 18-19.
12 Key Bridge Proposal at 15 (quoting 2004 Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 20524 ¶ 1).
13 Key Bridge Proposal at 16-18.
14 See id. at 1-6.
Notice15 and in turn and states that it will comply with the duties and responsibilities listed in the 2004
Order.16 Key Bridge also acknowledges that the current database managers already have a scheme for
synchronizing their databases and states that it “is able to support the existing peering scheme between the
current database managers.”17 We seek comment on the Key Bridge Proposal.
To allow the Commission to consider fully all substantive issuesregarding the Key Bridge Petition in as timely and efficient a manner as possible, commenters should
raise all issues in their initial filings. New issues may not be raised in responses or replies.18 A
party or interested person seeking to raise a new issue after the pleading cycle has closed must show
good cause why it was not possible for it to have raised the issue previously. Submissions after the
pleading cycle has closed that seek to raise new issues based on new facts or newly discovered facts
should be filed within 15 days after such facts are discovered. Absent such a showing of good cause,
any issues not timely raised may be disregarded by the Commission.
This matter shall be treated as a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding in accordance with the ex parte
rules.19 Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a
memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a
different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations
are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or
otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all
data presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in
part of the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter’s written comments,
memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or
paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings
governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing,
written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all
attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that
proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Comments are due no later than the Comment Date listed on the first page and reply comments
are due no later than the Reply Date listed on the first page of this public notice. All filings should
reference the docket number of this proceeding, which is listed on the first page of this public notice.
Under the Commission’s current procedures for the submission of filings and other documents,20
submissions in this matter may be filed electronically (i.e., through ECFS) or by hand delivery to the
15 See id. at 1-14; see also 2004 Public Notice, 19 FCC Rcd at 4600-01.
16 See Key Bridge Proposal at 6-11.
17 Id. at 6.
18 See 47 C.F.R. §1.45(c).
19 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq.
20 See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009).
If filed by ECFS,21 comments shall be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include
their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket number. Parties
may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions for e-mail
comments, commenters should send an e-mail to email@example.com, and should include the following
words in the body of the message, “get form.” A sample form and directions will be sent in reply.
If filed by paper, the original and one copy22 of each filing must be filed by hand or messenger
delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C.
20554. The filing hours at this location are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be
held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering
the building. Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and
Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S.
Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
One copy of each pleading must be delivered electronically, by e-mail or facsimile, or if delivered
as paper copy, by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (according to the procedures set forth above for paper filings), to: the
Commission’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., at FCC@BCPIWEB.COM or (202)
488-5563 (facsimile). Any submission that is e-mailed to Best Copy and Printing should include in the
subject line of the e-mail: (1) the docket number of this proceeding, which is listed on the first page of this
public notice; (2) the name of the submitting party; and (3) a brief description or title identifying the type
of document being submitted (e.g., WT Docket No. 13-__, [name of submitting party], Notice of Ex Parte
Copies of the Key Bridge Proposal and any subsequently-filed documents in this matter may be
obtained from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., in person at 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402,
Washington, D.C. 20554, via telephone at (202) 488-5300, via facsimile at (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail
at FCC@BCPIWEB.COM. The Key Bridge Proposal and any associated documents are also available
for public inspection and copying during normal reference room hours at the following Commission
office: FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C.
20554. The Key Bridge Proposal is also available electronically through ECFS, which may be accessed
on the Commission’s Internet website at http://www.fcc.gov.
To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org or call the Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations for filing comments (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: email@example.com; phone: (202) 418-0530; or TTY: (202) 418-0432.
For further information, contact Charles Oliver, Broadband Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-1325, email: Charles.Oliver@fcc.gov.
By the Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
21 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order,
13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998).
22 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c).
Note: We are currently transitioning our documents into web compatible formats for easier reading. We have done our best to supply this content to you in a presentable form, but there may be some formatting issues while we improve the technology. The original version of the document is available as a PDF, Word Document, or as plain text.