******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** February 6, 1997 DA 97-289 Released: February 7, 1997 Mr. James R. Ayotte Executive Vice President Manufactured Housing Institute 2101 Wilson Blvd. Suite 610 Arlington, VA 22201-3062 Dear Mr. Ayotte: Thank you for your letter of January 17, 1997. This letter is in response to your request for clarification regarding manufactured housing communities under the Commission's rule governing over-the-air reception devices (47 C. F. R. 1.4000). We are pleased to provide the clarification you requested. Please keep in mind that this letter constitutes the views of the Cable Services Bureau and has not been reviewed by the Commission. The Commission's rule was adopted pursuant to Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. It preempts governmental and non-governmental restrictions that impair the installation, maintenance or use of antennas designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service (DBS) and antennas designed to receive video programming services via multipoint distribution services (MDS), including multichannel multipoint distribution services (MMDS), instructional television fixed services (ITFS) and local multipoint distribution services (LMDS), provided the antenna is one meter or less in diameter, and antennas designed to receive television broadcast signals. Restrictions that meet certain exceptions for purposes of safety or historic preservation are not preempted. The Commission's rule went into effect on October 14, 1996, and preempts local laws and association or community restrictions if they conflict with the Commission's rule. The rule governing over-the-air reception devices applies to restrictions on antennas and dishes installed where the viewer has a direct or indirect ownership of property which is within his or her exclusive use or control. The rule applies to installation in or on a manufactured home owned by a viewer living in a land lease community because the owner of the manufactured home has an ownership interest in, and exclusive use or control of, the property in which he or she resides even though the home rests on land leased from the park owner. According to the Commission's rule, governmental and nongovernmental restrictions are prohibited if they "impair" use of antennas. Restrictions that prohibit installation of antennas and requirements that impose unreasonable expense or delay or preclude reception of an acceptable quality signal are considered an impairment of the viewer's use of an antenna. Not all restrictions and regulations, however, are preempted. Reasonable restrictions adopted by local governments, homeowner associations or manufactured housing communities that affect placement, appearance or installation of antennas are enforceable so long as they do not impair installation, maintenance or use of the antenna by imposing unreasonable expense or delay or by precluding reception of an acceptable quality signal. For example, the owner or operator of a manufactured housing land lease community may make reasonable requirements about the placement or appearance of an antenna on a manufactured home, so long as the requirements do not unreasonably delay installation, unreasonably add to the cost, or harm reception. The Commission's current rule does not apply to antennas installed on either rental property or common areas because these areas are not owned and exclusively used or controlled by the viewer. The Commission is currently considering whether to amend the scope of the rule to include within its coverage rental property or property that is commonly controlled or used. At the present time, restrictions concerning the installation of antennas directly on rented lots or in common areas in manufactured housing land lease communities are not covered by the rule. We hope you find this response useful. In accordance with our usual procedures, this response will be available to the general public on the Internet and in the Bureau's Public Reference Room. Please do not hesitate to contact us again if additional guidance would be helpful. Sincerely, Meredith J. Jones Chief, Cable Services Bureau