******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matters of ) ) UACC Midwest, Inc. d/b/a ) CC Docket No. 95-94 United Artists Cable Mississippi Gulf Coast; ) ) Telecable Associates, Incorporated; ) ) Vicksburg Video, Inc.; ) ) Mississippi Cablevision, Inc.; and ) ) Mississippi Cable Television Association, ) PA 91-0005 through ) PA 91-0009 Complainants, ) ) v. ) ) South Central Bell Telephone Company, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER Adopted: April 7, 1997 Released: April 8, 1997 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. On July 17, 1995, South Central Bell Telephone Company (South Central Bell) filed an Application for Review of the Common Carrier Bureau's order in UACC Midwest, Inc., et. al. v. South Central Bell Telephone Company (HDO) which designated the above-referenced parties pole attachment dispute for hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The HDO determined that the pole attachment rates South Central Bell charges UACC Midwest, Inc., et al. should reflect a proper conversion of accounts from Part 31 to Part 32. 2. On August 16, 1995, South Central Bell and UACC Midwest, Inc. et al. entered into a Settlement Agreement evidencing the resolution of the pole attachment complaints that were the subject of the HDO. On August 24, 1995, the ALJ issued an Order that granted a joint motion of the parties to dismiss the pole attachment complaints. 3. On January 11, 1996, South Central Bell and UACC Midwest, Inc. et al. filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Review and Opposition ("Joint Notice"). In the Joint Notice, the parties request that the Application for Review be withdrawn. 4. In addition, on November 20, 1995, South Central Bell and UACC Midwest, Inc. et al. filed a Joint Motion to Vacate the Hearing Designation Order ("Joint Motion"). Subsequently, on January 11, 1996, the parties filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Vacate requesting that the Joint Motion be withdrawn. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.101 and 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.101 and 0.321, that the Application for Review filed by South Central Bell on July 17, 1995 IS DISMISSED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 0.101 and 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.101 and 0.321, that the Joint Motion to Vacate the Hearing Designation Order filed on November 20, 1995 IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Meredith J. Jones Chief, Cable Services Bureau