********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554
                                 


In the Matter of                   )                                                                )              
Comcast Cablevision of Taylor, Inc.     )    CUID No.  MI0414 (Melvindale) 
                              )              
Complaint Regarding           )              
Cable Programming Services Tier Rates   )              

      
                             ORDER

     Adopted:  June 9, 1997                  Released:  June 11, 1997   

By the Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

     1.   In this Order we consider a complaint against the November 1, 1996 rate increase of
the above-referenced operator ("Operator") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the
community referenced above.  Operator  has attempted to justify its CPST rate through a benchmark
justification on FCC Form 1240.  We have already issued separate orders in which we denied
previous complaints against Operator's CPST rates.  Accordingly, this Order addresses only the
reasonableness of Operator's November 1, 1996 CPST rate increase.  

     2.   Under the Communications Act, the Commission is authorized to review the CPST
rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates charged are not
unreasonable.  If the Commission finds a rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate
and any refund liability.   The Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") and our rules
implementing the new legislation ("Interim Rules"), require that complaints against the CPST rates
be filed with the Commission by a local franchising authority ("LFA") that has received more than
one subscriber complaint. 

     3.   The LFA for the franchise area referenced above filed a complaint with the
Commission on April 28, 1997.  The LFA verified that it received more than one subscriber
complaint for the franchise area and that the first valid complaint was received by the LFA on
December 23, 1996.  The filing of a complete and timely LFA complaint triggers an obligation upon
the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates.  The Operator has the burden of
demonstrating that the CPST rates complained about are reasonable. 

     4.    To justify rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994 through a benchmark
showing, operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series.  Operators may justify adjustments to their
rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240 to reflect reasonably certain and quantifiable changes
in external costs, inflation, and the number of regulated channels that are projected for the twelve
months following the rate change.  Any incurred cost that is not projected may be accrued with
interest and added to rates at a later time.
     
     5.   Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1240 for the projected period November 1,
1996 through October 31, 1997, we find Operator's calculated maximum permitted rate ("MPR") of
$13.43 to be reasonable.  Because Operator's actual rate of $13.43 does not exceed its MPR, we find
Operator's actual rate of $13.43, effective November 1, 1996, to be reasonable.    

     6.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules,
47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rate of $13.43, charged by Operator in the franchise area referenced
above beginning November 1, 1996,  IS REASONABLE.

     7.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules,
47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaint against Operator's November 1, 1996 CPST rate increase in
the franchise area referenced above IS DENIED.

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 



                         Elizabeth W. Beaty
                         Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division                          Cable Services Bureau