********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

                                )
In the Matter of                )
                                )
  Century Communications          )CUID No.ID0031 (City of Moscow)
  d/b/a Pullman TV Cable Co., Inc.        )
                                   )
                                      )
     Complaint Regarding        )
Cable Programming Services Tier Rates)


                             ORDER

    Adopted:  July 24, 1997              Released:  July 28, 1997

By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

      1.In this Order, we consider a complaint concerning the rates of the above-captioned operator
("Operator") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above. 
Operator's response includes benchmark justifications filed on FCC Form 1200, FCC Form 1210 and FCC
Form 1240's.  This Order addresses the reasonableness of Operator's rates for the period after May 14, 1994. 
We conclude that Operator's CPST rates after May 14, 1994 are not unreasonable.  

      2.Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission")
is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that
rates charged are not unreasonable.  The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992
("1992 Cable Act"), and our rules in effect at the time the complaint was filed, required the Commission
to review CPST rates upon the filing of a valid complaint by a subscriber.  The filing of a valid complaint
triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates.  If the
Commission finds the rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability. 


      3.The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993.  The
Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994.  Cable operators with valid
CPST complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that  their CPST rates were in
compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994,
and that their rates were in compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward.  Cable operators
attempting to justify their rates for the period prior to May 15, 1994 using a benchmark showing must
complete and file FCC Form 393.  Operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series to justify their rates for
the period  beginning May 15, 1994 using a benchmark showing.  Cable operators may also justify rate
increases based on the addition and deletion  of channels, changes in certain external costs, and inflation, by
filing FCC Form 1210.  FCC  Form 1210 must be filed at least 30 days before new rates are scheduled to
go into effect where the Commission has found the cable programming service rate to be unreasonable less
than one year prior to the filing, or where there is a pending complaint against the CPST rate.  

      4.Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1200, FCC Form 1210 and FCC Form 1240's, we
conclude that Operator has justified its CPST rates charged during the period from May 15, 1994 to
March 31, 1997.  We also find that Operator has justified a maximum permitted CPST rate of $21.63,
effective July 1, 1997.  

      5.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R.  0.321, that the monthly CPST rates charged by Operator in the community referenced above,  from
August 1, 1995 to February 28, 1995, ARE NOT UNREASONABLE. 
     
      6.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R.  0.321, that the monthly CPST rate of $20.33 charged by Operator in the community referenced
above, effective July 1, 1997, IS NOT UNREASONABLE.

      7.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaint referenced herein against the CPST rates charged by Operator in the
community referenced above IS DENIED.
     
     FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 



     Margaret M. Egler
     Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
     Cable Services Bureau