******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Marcus Cable Partners, L.P. )CUID No.WI0750 (Village of Kewaskum) ) ) Complaint Regarding ) Cable Programming Services Tier Rates) ORDER Adopted: August 12, 1997 Released: August 14, 1997 By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1.In this Order we consider a complaint concerning the rates of the above-captioned operator ("Operator") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above. Operator's response includes benchmark justifications filed on FCC Forms 393, 1200, 1210 and 1240. This Order addresses the reasonableness of Operator's rates for the period September 1, 1993, through May 14, 1994, as justified on Operator's FCC Form 393 and for the period after May 14, 1994, as justified on Operator's FCC Forms 1200, 1210 and 1240. 2.Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates charged are not unreasonable. The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992 Cable Act"), and our rules in effect at the time the complaint was filed, required the Commission to review CPST rates upon the filing of a valid complaint by a subscriber. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates. If the Commission finds the rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability. 3.The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993. The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994. Cable operators with valid CPST complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that their CPST rates were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994, and that their rates were in compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward. Cable operators attempting to justify their rates for the period prior to May 15, 1994 using a benchmark showing must complete and file FCC Form 393. Operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series to justify their rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994 using a benchmark showing. Cable operators may also justify rate increases based on the addition and deletion of channels, changes in certain external costs, and inflation, by filing FCC Form 1210. FCC Form 1210 must be filed at least 30 days before new rates are scheduled to go into effect where the Commission has found the cable programming service rate to be unreasonable less than one year prior to the filing, or where there is a pending complaint against the CPST rate. Operators may alternatively justify adjustments to their rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240 to reflect reasonably certain and quantifiable changes in external costs, inflation, and the number of regulated channels that are projected for the twelve months following the rate change. Any incurred cost that is not projected may be accrued with interest and added to rates at a later time. 4.The Commission's rules also provide for a refund liability deferral period, if timely requested by Operator, beginning May 15, 1994 and ending July 14, 1994, for any overcharges resulting from Operator's calculation of a new maximum permitted rate ("MPR") on FCC Form 1200. This deferral of refund liability, however, does not apply to refund liability that may have occurred because Operator's March 31, 1994 rates for its CPST subject to regulation were higher than levels permitted under the Commission's rules in effect before May 15, 1994. Accordingly, while the liability period for Operator's overcharges associated with its FCC Form 1200 filing may not begin to run until July 15, 1994, Operator will incur refund liability between May 15, 1994 and July 14, 1994 for any CPST rates charged above the MPR approved by the Commission on Operator's FCC Form 393. 5.Upon review of Operator's FCC Forms 393, 1200, 1210 and 1240, we find that Operator has justified its CPST rates effective September 1, 1993 to May 31, 1997. We also find that Operator has justified its CPST rate of $16.94, effective June 1, 1997. 6.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the monthly CPST rates charged by Operator in the community referenced above, from February 17, 1994 to May 31, 1997 ARE NOT UNREASONABLE. 7.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the monthly CPST rate of $16.94 charged by Operator in the community referenced above, effective June 1, 1997 IS NOT UNREASONABLE. 8.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaint referenced herein against the CPST rates charged by Operator in the community referenced above IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau