******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Mark Twain Cablevision L.P. ) ) CUID No. NM0064 (Espanola) ) ) Complaint Regarding Cable ) Programming Services Tier Rate ) ORDER Adopted: November 10, 1997 Released: November 14, 1997 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order we consider a complaint against the rate that the above-captioned operator ("Operator") was charging for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above because the complaint concerns rates that are within the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission"). Under the Communications Act, the Commission regulates the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition upon the filing of a valid complaint. On September 19, 1997, the Commission released an order finding Operator in default for failing to respond to the above referenced complaint. On October 8, 1997, Operator responded to our Prior Order ("Order"). This order addresses Operator's response. 2. On March 30, 1994, the Commission received in response to the complaint a motion to dismiss filed by Operator. In that motion to dismiss Operator asserts that the complaint should be dismissed because the complainant did not file his complaint within the specified time frame pursuant to Section 76.953 of our rules. Review of the complaint revealed that the complaint, which was against rates in effect on September 1, 1993, was received by the Commission on February 28, 1994 via facsimile transmission. Because Line 13 of FCC Form 329 clearly instructs complainants to "[m]ail or FAX the original signed copy of this completed form" to the Commission, we find that complainant has timely filed his complaint. Operator also asserts that complainant entered a rate that included a basic service tier rate on line 7 of the FCC Form 329. In general, we will find valid any complaint that states a claim on which relief can be granted and provides adequate information to allow us to process the complaint, despite minor flaws or inaccuracies. We believe this approach best implements the mandate of the 1992 Cable Act. Because the rate listed on Line 7 and on the subscribers attached bills indicate that the subscriber received CPST, we find it reasonable to conclude that the subscriber objected to the CPST rate. We therefore find the complaint dated February 28, 1994 valid and deny Operator's motion to dismiss. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, that the motion of Mark Twain Cablevision, L.P., to dismiss the complaint against its cable programming service price charged in Espanola, New Mexico (CUID No. NM0064) IS DENIED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321, that Mark Twain Cablevision file with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, FCC Form 393, and the appropriate FCC Form 1200 series filings, within 30 days of the release of this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Meredith J. Jones Chief, Cable Services Bureau